CUSTODY AND VISITATION

Nev. Rev. Stat. 125C
in effect

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.001 State policy.

The Legislature declares that it is the policy of this State: 1. To ensure that minor children have frequent associations and a continuing relationship with both parents after the parents have ended their relationship, become separated or dissolved their marriage; 2. To encourage such parents to share the rights and responsibilities of child rearing; and 3. To establish that such parents have an equivalent duty to provide their minor children with necessary maintenance, health care, education and financial support. As used in this subsection, “equivalent” must not be construed to mean that both parents are responsible for providing the same amount of financial support to their children.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.002 Joint legal custody.

1. When a court is making a determination regarding the legal custody of a child, there is a presumption, affecting the burden of proof, that joint legal custody would be in the best interest of a minor child if: (a) The parents have agreed to an award of joint legal custody or so agree in open court at a hearing for the purpose of determining the legal custody of the minor child; or (b) A parent has demonstrated, or has attempted to demonstrate but has had his or her efforts frustrated by the other parent, an intent to establish a meaningful relationship with the minor child. 2. The court may award joint legal custody without awarding joint physical custody.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.003 Best interests of child: Primary physical custody; presumptions; child born out of wedlock.

1. A court may award primary physical custody to a parent if the court determines that joint physical custody is not in the best interest of a child. An award of joint physical custody is presumed not to be in the best interest of the child if: (a) The court determines by substantial evidence that a parent is unable to adequately care for a minor child for at least 146 days of the year; (b) A child is born out of wedlock and the provisions of subsection 2 are applicable; or (c) Except as otherwise provided in subsection 6 of NRS 125C.0035 or NRS 125C.210 , there has been a determination by the court after an evidentiary hearing and finding by clear and convincing evidence that a parent has engaged in one or more acts of domestic violence against the child, a parent of the child or any other person residing with the child. The presumption created by this paragraph is a rebuttable presumption. 2. A court may award primary physical custody of a child born out of wedlock to: (a) The mother of the child if: (1) The mother has not married the father of the child; (2) A judgment or order of a court, or a judgment or order entered pursuant to an expedited process, determining the paternity of the child has not been entered; and (3) The father of the child: (I) Is not subject to any presumption of paternity under NRS 126.051 ; (II) Has never acknowledged paternity pursuant to NRS 126.053 ; or (III) Has had actual knowledge of his paternity but has abandoned the child. (b) The father of the child if: (1) The mother has abandoned the child; and (2) The father has provided sole care and custody of the child in her absence. 3. As used in this section: (a) “Abandoned” means that a mother or father has: (1) Failed, for a continuous period of not less than 6 months, to provide substantial personal and economic support to the child; or (2) Knowingly declined, for a continuous period of not less than 6 months, to have any meaningful relationship with the child. (b) “Expedited process” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 126.161 .

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.004 Award of custody to person other than parent.

1. Before the court makes an order awarding custody to any person other than a parent, without the consent of the parents, it shall make a finding that an award of custody to a parent would be detrimental to the child and the award to a nonparent is required to serve the best interest of the child. 2. No allegation that parental custody would be detrimental to the child, other than a statement of that ultimate fact, may appear in the pleadings. 3. The court may exclude the public from any hearing on this issue.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.005 Plan for carrying out court’s order; access to child’s records.

1. The court may, when appropriate, require the parents to submit to the court a plan for carrying out the court’s order concerning custody. 2. Access to records and other information pertaining to a minor child, including, without limitation, medical, dental and school records, must not be denied to a parent for the reason that the parent is not the child’s custodial parent.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.006 Consent required from noncustodial parent to relocate child when primary physical custody established; petition for permission from court; attorney’s fees and costs.

1. If primary physical custody has been established pursuant to an order, judgment or decree of a court and the custodial parent intends to relocate his or her residence to a place outside of this State or to a place within this State that is at such a distance that would substantially impair the ability of the other parent to maintain a meaningful relationship with the child, and the custodial parent desires to take the child with him or her, the custodial parent shall, before relocating: (a) Attempt to obtain the written consent of the noncustodial parent to relocate with the child; and (b) If the noncustodial parent refuses to give that consent, petition the court for permission to relocate with the child. 2. The court may award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to the custodial parent if the court finds that the noncustodial parent refused to consent to the custodial parent’s relocation with the child: (a) Without having reasonable grounds for such refusal; or (b) For the purpose of harassing the custodial parent. 3. A parent who relocates with a child pursuant to this section without the written consent of the noncustodial parent or the permission of the court is subject to the provisions of NRS 200.359 .

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.007 Petition for permission to relocate; factors to be weighed by court.

1. In every instance of a petition for permission to relocate with a child that is filed pursuant to NRS 125C.006 or 125C.0065 , the relocating parent must demonstrate to the court that: (a) There exists a sensible, good-faith reason for the move, and the move is not intended to deprive the non-relocating parent of his or her parenting time; (b) The best interests of the child are served by allowing the relocating parent to relocate with the child; and (c) The child and the relocating parent will benefit from an actual advantage as a result of the relocation. 2. If a relocating parent demonstrates to the court the provisions set forth in subsection 1, the court must then weigh the following factors and the impact of each on the child, the relocating parent and the non-relocating parent, including, without limitation, the extent to which the compelling interests of the child, the relocating parent and the non-relocating parent are accommodated: (a) The extent to which the relocation is likely to improve the quality of life for the child and the relocating parent; (b) Whether the motives of the relocating parent are honorable and not designed to frustrate or defeat any visitation rights accorded to the non-relocating parent; (c) Whether the relocating parent will comply with any substitute visitation orders issued by the court if permission to relocate is granted; (d) Whether the motives of the non-relocating parent are honorable in resisting the petition for permission to relocate or to what extent any opposition to the petition for permission to relocate is intended to secure a financial advantage in the form of ongoing support obligations or otherwise; (e) Whether there will be a realistic opportunity for the non-relocating parent to maintain a visitation schedule that will adequately foster and preserve the parental relationship between the child and the non-relocating parent if permission to relocate is granted; and (f) Any other factor necessary to assist the court in determining whether to grant permission to relocate. 3. A parent who desires to relocate with a child pursuant to NRS 125C.006 or 125C.0065 has the burden of proving that relocating with the child is in the best interest of the child.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.008 Summary proceeding for custody: Conditions.

An action to determine custody of a child may be brought by the summary proceeding set forth in NRS 125C.008 to 125C.0087, inclusive, when all of the following conditions exist at the time the summary proceeding is commenced: 1. A court has jurisdiction pursuant to chapter 125A of NRS. 2. The parties have executed an agreement as to the custody of the child, which must specify, without limitation, the custody, medical or other care, education, maintenance and support of the child. 3. The use of the summary proceeding set forth in NRS 125C.008 to 125C.0087 , inclusive, is in the best interest of the child. 4. The agreement of the parties defines the rights and duties of the parties with sufficient particularity to ensure that these rights and duties can be properly enforced and that the best interest of the child is achieved. As used in this subsection, “sufficient particularity” means a statement of the rights in absolute terms and not by the use of the term “reasonable” or any other similar term which is susceptible to different interpretations by the parties. 5. The agreement is in accordance with the provisions of chapter 125A of NRS and NRS 125C.0045 and any other provision of law governing the custody of a child. 6. The parties waive their respective rights to written notice of the order determining custody of the child, to appeal, to request findings of facts and conclusions of law and to move for a new trial. 7. The parties desire that the court enter an order that determines the custody of the child.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.010 Order awarding visitation rights must define rights with particularity and specify habitual residence of child.

1. Any order awarding a party a right of visitation of a minor child must: (a) Define that right with sufficient particularity to ensure that the rights of the parties can be properly enforced and that the best interest of the child is achieved; and (b) Specify that the State of Nevada or the state where the child resides within the United States of America is the habitual residence of the child. Ê The order must include all specific times and other terms of the right of visitation. 2. As used in this section, “sufficient particularity” means a statement of the rights in absolute terms and not by the use of the term “reasonable” or other similar term which is susceptible to different interpretations by the parties.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0015 Parents have joint custody until otherwise ordered by court.

1. The parent and child relationship extends equally to every child and to every parent, regardless of the marital status of the parents. 2. If a court has not made a determination regarding the custody of a child, each parent has joint legal custody and joint physical custody of the child until otherwise ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.020 Rights of noncustodial parent: Additional visits to compensate for wrongful deprivation of right to visit.

1. In a dispute concerning the rights of a noncustodial parent to visit his or her child, the court may, if it finds that the noncustodial parent is being wrongfully deprived of his or her right to visit, enter a judgment ordering the custodial parent to permit additional visits to compensate for the visit of which the noncustodial parent was deprived. 2. An additional visit must be: (a) Of the same type and duration as the wrongfully denied visit; (b) Taken within 1 year after the wrongfully denied visit; and (c) At a time chosen by the noncustodial parent. 3. The noncustodial parent must give the court and the custodial parent written notice of his or her intention to make the additional visit at least 7 days before the proposed visit if it is to be on a weekday or weekend and at least 30 days before the proposed visit if it is to be on a holiday or vacation.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0025 Joint physical custody.

1. When a court is making a determination regarding the physical custody of a child, there is a preference that joint physical custody would be in the best interest of a minor child if: (a) The parents have agreed to an award of joint physical custody or so agree in open court at a hearing for the purpose of determining the physical custody of the minor child; or (b) A parent has demonstrated, or has attempted to demonstrate but has had his or her efforts frustrated by the other parent, an intent to establish a meaningful relationship with the minor child. 2. For assistance in determining whether an award of joint physical custody is appropriate, the court may direct that an investigation be conducted.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.030 Imprisonment for contempt for failure to comply with judgment ordering additional visit.

1. A custodial parent who fails to comply with a judgment ordering an additional visit may, upon a judgment of the court, be found guilty of contempt and sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail. During the period of imprisonment, the court may authorize his or her temporary release from confinement during such hours and under such supervision as the court determines are necessary to allow the custodial parent to go to and return from his or her place of employment. 2. A custodial parent imprisoned for contempt pursuant to subsection 1 must be released from the jail if the court has reasonable cause to believe that the custodial parent will comply with the order for the additional visit.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0035 Best interests of child: Joint physical custody; preferences; presumptions when court determines parent or person seeking custody is perpetrator of domestic violence or has committed act of abduction against child or any other child.

1. In any action for determining physical custody of a minor child, the sole consideration of the court is the best interest of the child. If it appears to the court that joint physical custody would be in the best interest of the child, the court may grant physical custody to the parties jointly. 2. Preference must not be given to either parent for the sole reason that the parent is the mother or the father of the child. 3. The court shall award physical custody in the following order of preference unless in a particular case the best interest of the child requires otherwise: (a) To both parents jointly pursuant to NRS 125C.0025 or to either parent pursuant to NRS 125C.003 . If the court does not enter an order awarding joint physical custody of a child after either parent has applied for joint physical custody, the court shall state in its decision the reason for its denial of the parent’s application. (b) To a person or persons in whose home the child has been living and where the child has had a wholesome and stable environment. (c) To any person related within the fifth degree of consanguinity to the child whom the court finds suitable and able to provide proper care and guidance for the child, regardless of whether the relative resides within this State. (d) To any other person or persons whom the court finds suitable and able to provide proper care and guidance for the child. 4. In determining the best interest of the child, the court shall consider and set forth its specific findings concerning, among other things: (a) The wishes of the child if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to form an intelligent preference as to his or her physical custody. (b) Any nomination of a guardian for the child by a parent. (c) Which parent is more likely to allow the child to have frequent associations and a continuing relationship with the noncustodial parent. (d) The level of conflict between the parents. (e) The ability of the parents to cooperate to meet the needs of the child. (f) The mental and physical health of the parents. (g) The physical, developmental and emotional needs of the child. (h) The nature of the relationship of the child with each parent. (i) The ability of the child to maintain a relationship with any sibling. (j) Any history of parental abuse or neglect of the child or a sibling of the child. (k) Whether either parent or any other person seeking physical custody has engaged in an act of domestic violence against the child, a parent of the child or any other person residing with the child. (l) Whether either parent or any other person seeking physical custody has committed any act of abduction against the child or any other child. 5. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 6 or NRS 125C.210 , a determination by the court after an evidentiary hearing and finding by clear and convincing evidence that either parent or any other person seeking physical custody has engaged in one or more acts of domestic violence against the child, a parent of the child or any other person residing with the child creates a rebuttable presumption that sole or joint physical custody of the child by the perpetrator of the domestic violence is not in the best interest of the child. Upon making such a determination, the court shall set forth: (a) Findings of fact that support the determination that one or more acts of domestic violence occurred; and (b) Findings that the custody or visitation arrangement ordered by the court adequately protects the child and the parent or other victim of domestic violence who resided with the child. 6. If after an evidentiary hearing held pursuant to subsection 5 the court determines that each party has engaged in acts of domestic violence, it shall, if possible, then determine which person was the primary physical aggressor. In determining which party was the primary physical aggressor for the purposes of this section, the court shall consider: (a) All prior acts of domestic violence involving either party; (b) The relative severity of the injuries, if any, inflicted upon the persons involved in those prior acts of domestic violence; (c) The likelihood of future injury; (d) Whether, during the prior acts, one of the parties acted in self-defense; and (e) Any other factors which the court deems relevant to the determination. Ê In such a case, if it is not possible for the court to determine which party is the primary physical aggressor, the presumption created pursuant to subsection 5 applies to both parties. If it is possible for the court to determine which party is the primary physical aggressor, the presumption created pursuant to subsection 5 applies only to the party determined by the court to be the primary physical aggressor. 7. A determination by the court after an evidentiary hearing and finding by clear and convincing evidence that either parent or any other person seeking physical custody has committed any act of abduction against the child or any other child creates a rebuttable presumption that sole or joint physical custody or unsupervised visitation of the child by the perpetrator of the abduction is not in the best interest of the child. If the parent or other person seeking physical custody does not rebut the presumption, the court shall not enter an order for sole or joint physical custody or unsupervised visitation of the child by the perpetrator and the court shall set forth: (a) Findings of fact that support the determination that one or more acts of abduction occurred; and (b) Findings that the custody or visitation arrangement ordered by the court adequately protects the child and the parent or other person from whom the child was abducted. 8. For the purposes of subsection 7, any of the following acts constitute conclusive evidence that an act of abduction occurred: (a) A conviction of the defendant of any violation of NRS 200.310 to 200.340 , inclusive, or 200.359 or a law of any other jurisdiction that prohibits the same or similar conduct; (b) A plea of guilty or nolo contendere by the defendant to any violation of NRS 200.310 to 200.340 , inclusive, or 200.359 or a law of any other jurisdiction that prohibits the same or similar conduct; or (c) An admission by the defendant to the court of the facts contained in the charging document alleging a violation of NRS 200.310 to 200.340 , inclusive, or 200.359 or a law of any other jurisdiction that prohibits the same or similar conduct. 9. If, after a court enters a final order concerning physical custody of the child, a magistrate determines there is probable cause to believe that an act of abduction has been committed against the child or any other child and that a person who has been awarded sole or joint physical custody or unsupervised visitation of the child has committed the act, the court shall, upon a motion to modify the order concerning physical custody, reconsider the previous order concerning physical custody pursuant to subsections 7 and 8. 10. As used in this section: (a) “Abduction” means the commission of an act described in NRS 200.310 to 200.340 , inclusive, or 200.359 or a law of any other jurisdiction that prohibits the same or similar conduct. (b) “Domestic violence” means the commission of any act described in NRS 33.018 .

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.040 Imprisonment for contempt: Violation of condition; failure to return when required.

1. If a custodial parent is imprisoned for contempt pursuant to NRS 125C.030 and violates any condition of that imprisonment, the court may: (a) Require that the custodial parent be confined to the county jail for the remaining period of his or her sentence; and (b) Deny the custodial parent the privilege of a temporary release from confinement for his or her employment. 2. A custodial parent, imprisoned for contempt, who fails to return to the jail at the time required by the court after being temporarily released from confinement for his or her employment, may be deemed to have escaped from custody and, if so, the custodial parent is guilty of a misdemeanor.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0045 Court orders; modification or termination of orders; form for orders; court may order parent to post bond if parent resides in or has significant commitments in foreign country.

1. In any action for determining the custody of a minor child, the court may, except as otherwise provided in this section and NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693 , inclusive, and chapter 130 of NRS: (a) During the pendency of the action, at the final hearing or at any time thereafter during the minority of the child, make such an order for the custody, care, education, maintenance and support of the minor child as appears in his or her best interest; and (b) At any time modify or vacate its order, even if custody was determined pursuant to an action for divorce and the divorce was obtained by default without an appearance in the action by one of the parties. Ê The party seeking such an order shall submit to the jurisdiction of the court for the purposes of this subsection. The court may make such an order upon the application of one of the parties or the legal guardian of the minor. 2. Any order for joint custody may be modified or terminated by the court upon the petition of one or both parents or on the court’s own motion if it is shown that the best interest of the child requires the modification or termination. The court shall state in its decision the reasons for the order of modification or termination if either parent opposes it. 3. Any order for custody of a minor child entered by a court of another state may, subject to the provisions of NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693 , inclusive, and to the jurisdictional requirements in chapter 125A of NRS, be modified at any time to an order of joint custody. 4. A party may proceed pursuant to this section without counsel. 5. Any order awarding a party a limited right of custody to a child must define that right with sufficient particularity to ensure that the rights of the parties can be properly enforced and that the best interest of the child is achieved. The order must include all specific times and other terms of the limited right of custody. As used in this subsection, “sufficient particularity” means a statement of the rights in absolute terms and not by the use of the term “reasonable” or other similar term which is susceptible to different interpretations by the parties. 6. All orders authorized by this section must be made in accordance with the provisions of chapter 125A of NRS and NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693 , inclusive, and must contain the following language: PENALTY FOR VIOLATION OF ORDER: THE ABDUCTION, CONCEALMENT OR DETENTION OF A CHILD IN VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER IS PUNISHABLE AS A CATEGORY D FELONY AS PROVIDED IN NRS 193.130 . NRS 200.359 provides that every person having a limited right of custody to a child or any parent having no right of custody to the child who willfully detains, conceals or removes the child from a parent, guardian or other person having lawful custody or a right of visitation of the child in violation of an order of this court, or removes the child from the jurisdiction of the court without the consent of either the court or all persons who have the right to custody or visitation is subject to being punished for a category D felony as provided in NRS 193.130 . 7. In addition to the language required pursuant to subsection 6, all orders authorized by this section must specify that the terms of the Hague Convention of October 25, 1980, adopted by the 14th Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, apply if a parent abducts or wrongfully retains a child in a foreign country. 8. If a parent of the child lives in a foreign country or has significant commitments in a foreign country: (a) The parties may agree, and the court shall include in the order for custody of the child, that the United States is the country of habitual residence of the child for the purposes of applying the terms of the Hague Convention as set forth in subsection 7. (b) Upon motion of one of the parties, the court may order the parent to post a bond if the court determines that the parent poses an imminent risk of wrongfully removing or concealing the child outside the country of habitual residence. The bond must be in an amount determined by the court and may be used only to pay for the cost of locating the child and returning the child to his or her habitual residence if the child is wrongfully removed from or concealed outside the country of habitual residence. The fact that a parent has significant commitments in a foreign country does not create a presumption that the parent poses an imminent risk of wrongfully removing or concealing the child. 9. Except where a contract providing otherwise has been executed pursuant to NRS 123.080 , the obligation for care, education, maintenance and support of any minor child created by any order entered pursuant to this section ceases: (a) Upon the death of the person to whom the order was directed; or (b) When the child reaches 18 years of age if the child is no longer enrolled in high school, otherwise, when the child reaches 19 years of age. 10. As used in this section, a parent has “significant commitments in a foreign country” if the parent: (a) Is a citizen of a foreign country; (b) Possesses a passport in his or her name from a foreign country; (c) Became a citizen of the United States after marrying the other parent of the child; or (d) Frequently travels to a foreign country.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.050 Petition for right of visitation for certain relatives and other persons.

1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, if a parent of an unmarried minor child: (a) Is deceased; (b) Is divorced or separated from the parent who has custody of the child; (c) Has never been legally married to the other parent of the child, but cohabitated with the other parent and is deceased or is separated from the other parent; or (d) Has relinquished his or her parental rights or his or her parental rights have been terminated, Ê the district court in the county in which the child resides may grant to the great-grandparents and grandparents of the child and to other children of either parent of the child a reasonable right to visit the child during the child’s minority. 2. If the child has resided with a person with whom the child has established a meaningful relationship, the district court in the county in which the child resides also may grant to that person a reasonable right to visit the child during the child’s minority, regardless of whether the person is related to the child. 3. A party may seek a reasonable right to visit the child during the child’s minority pursuant to subsection 1 or 2 only if a parent of the child has denied or unreasonably restricted visits with the child. 4. If a parent of the child has denied or unreasonably restricted visits with the child, there is a rebuttable presumption that the granting of a right to visitation to a party seeking visitation is not in the best interests of the child. To rebut this presumption, the party seeking visitation must prove by clear and convincing evidence that it is in the best interests of the child to grant visitation. 5. The court may grant a party seeking visitation pursuant to subsection 1 or 2 a reasonable right to visit the child during the child’s minority only if the court finds that the party seeking visitation has rebutted the presumption established in subsection 4. 6. In determining whether the party seeking visitation has rebutted the presumption established in subsection 4, the court shall consider: (a) The love, affection and other emotional ties existing between the party seeking visitation and the child. (b) The capacity and disposition of the party seeking visitation to: (1) Give the child love, affection and guidance and serve as a role model to the child; (2) Cooperate in providing the child with food, clothing and other material needs during visitation; and (3) Cooperate in providing the child with health care or alternative care recognized and permitted under the laws of this State in lieu of health care. (c) The prior relationship between the child and the party seeking visitation, including, without limitation, whether the child resided with the party seeking visitation and whether the child was included in holidays and family gatherings with the party seeking visitation. (d) The moral fitness of the party seeking visitation. (e) The mental and physical health of the party seeking visitation. (f) The reasonable preference of the child, if the child has a preference, and if the child is determined to be of sufficient maturity to express a preference. (g) The willingness and ability of the party seeking visitation to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing relationship between the child and the parent or parents of the child as well as with other relatives of the child. (h) The medical and other needs of the child related to health as affected by the visitation. (i) The support provided by the party seeking visitation, including, without limitation, whether the party has contributed to the financial support of the child. (j) Any other factor arising solely from the facts and circumstances of the particular dispute that specifically pertains to the need for granting a right to visitation pursuant to subsection 1 or 2 against the wishes of a parent of the child. 7. If the parental rights of either or both natural parents of a child are relinquished or terminated, and the child is placed in the custody of a public agency or a private agency licensed to place children in homes, the district court in the county in which the child resides may grant to the great-grandparents and grandparents of the child and to other children of either parent of the child a reasonable right to visit the child during the child’s minority if a petition therefor is filed with the court before the date on which the parental rights are relinquished or terminated. In determining whether to grant this right to a party seeking visitation, the court must find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the visits would be in the best interests of the child in light of the considerations set forth in paragraphs (a) to (i), inclusive, of subsection 6. 8. Rights to visit a child may be granted: (a) In a divorce decree; (b) In an order of separate maintenance; or (c) Upon a petition filed by an eligible person: (1) After a divorce or separation or after the death of a parent, or upon the relinquishment or termination of a parental right; (2) If the parents of the child were not legally married and were cohabitating, after the death of a parent or after the separation of the parents of the child; or (3) If the petition is based on the provisions of subsection 2, after the eligible person ceases to reside with the child. 9. If a court terminates the parental rights of a parent who is divorced or separated, any rights previously granted pursuant to subsection 1 also must be terminated, unless the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that visits by those persons would be in the best interests of the child. 10. For the purposes of this section, “separation” means: (a) A legal separation or any other separation of a married couple if the couple has lived separate and apart for 30 days or more and has no present intention of resuming a marital relationship; or (b) If a couple was not legally married but cohabitating, a separation of the couple if the couple has lived separate and apart for 30 days or more and has no present intention of resuming cohabitation or entering into a marital relationship.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0055 Order for production of child before court; determinations concerning physical custody of child.

1. If, during any action for determining the custody of a minor child, either before or after the entry of a final order concerning the custody of a minor child, it appears to the court that any minor child of either party has been, or is likely to be, taken or removed out of this State or concealed within this State, the court shall forthwith order such child to be produced before it and make such disposition of the child’s custody as appears most advantageous to and in the best interest of the child and most likely to secure to him or her the benefit of the final order or the modification or termination of the final order to be made in his or her behalf. 2. If, during any action for determining the custody of a minor child, either before or after the entry of a final order concerning the custody of a minor child, the court finds that it would be in the best interest of the minor child, the court may enter an order providing that a party may, with the assistance of the appropriate law enforcement agency, obtain physical custody of the child from the party having physical custody of the child. The order must provide that if the party obtains physical custody of the child, the child must be produced before the court as soon as practicable to allow the court to make such disposition of the child’s custody as appears most advantageous to and in the best interest of the child and most likely to secure to him or her the benefit of the final order or the modification or termination of the final order to be made in his or her behalf. 3. If the court enters an order pursuant to subsection 2 providing that a party may obtain physical custody of a child, the court shall order that party to give the party having physical custody of the child notice at least 24 hours before the time at which he or she intends to obtain physical custody of the child, unless the court deems that requiring the notice would likely defeat the purpose of the order. 4. All orders for a party to appear with a child issued pursuant to this section may be enforced by issuing a warrant of arrest against that party to secure his or her appearance with the child. 5. A proceeding under this section must be given priority on the court calendar.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0065 Consent required from non-relocating parent to relocate child when joint physical custody established; petition for primary physical custody; attorney’s fees and costs.

1. If joint physical custody has been established pursuant to an order, judgment or decree of a court and one parent intends to relocate his or her residence to a place outside of this State or to a place within this State that is at such a distance that would substantially impair the ability of the other parent to maintain a meaningful relationship with the child, and the relocating parent desires to take the child with him or her, the relocating parent shall, before relocating: (a) Attempt to obtain the written consent of the non-relocating parent to relocate with the child; and (b) If the non-relocating parent refuses to give that consent, petition the court for primary physical custody for the purpose of relocating. 2. The court may award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to the relocating parent if the court finds that the non-relocating parent refused to consent to the relocating parent’s relocation with the child: (a) Without having reasonable grounds for such refusal; or (b) For the purpose of harassing the relocating parent. 3. A parent who relocates with a child pursuant to this section before the court enters an order granting the parent primary physical custody of the child and permission to relocate with the child is subject to the provisions of NRS 200.359 .

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0075 Unlawful relocation with child; attorney’s fees and costs.

If a parent with primary physical custody or joint physical custody relocates with a child in violation of NRS 200.359: 1. The court shall not consider any post-relocation facts or circumstances regarding the welfare of the child or the relocating parent in making any determination. 2. If the non-relocating parent files an action in response to the violation, the non-relocating parent is entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred as a result of the violation.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0083 Summary proceeding for custody: Commencement of action; contents of petition.

1. A summary proceeding to determine the custody of a child may be commenced by filing in any district court a joint petition, signed under oath by both parties, stating that as of the date of filing, every condition set forth in NRS 125C.008 has been met. 2. The petition must also provide the information required pursuant to NRS 125A.385 . 3. The agreement pursuant to NRS 125C.008 of which the parties wish the court to approve or make a part of the order must be included in the petition or identified and attached to the petition as an exhibit.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0085 Summary proceeding for custody: Termination of summary proceeding by revocation of petition.

1. At any time before the entry of an order to determine the custody of a child, either party to a joint petition filed pursuant to NRS 125C.0083 may revoke the joint petition and thereby terminate the summary proceeding to determine the custody of the child. 2. The revocation may be effected by filing a notice of revocation with the clerk of the court in which the summary proceeding was commenced. 3. The revoking party shall send a copy of the notice of revocation to the other party by first-class mail, postage prepaid, at his or her last known address.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0087 Summary proceeding for custody: Entry of order.

1. Entry of an order upon a petition for a summary proceeding for a determination of the custody of a child constitutes an adjudication of the rights and obligations of the parties regarding the custody, care, education, maintenance and support of the child and the respective rights of the parties to written notice of entry of the order, to appeal, to request findings of facts and conclusions of law and to move for a new trial. 2. An order entered pursuant to this section does not prejudice or bar the rights of either party to petition a court to modify or vacate the order pursuant to NRS 125C.0045 or any other provision of law.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0089 Applicability of Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure.

Except as otherwise provided in NRS 125C.008 to 125C.0087, inclusive, the proceedings, pleadings and practice must conform to the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure as nearly as conveniently as possible, but all preliminary and final orders may be in such form as best effects the object of this chapter and produces substantial justice.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.203 Definitions.

As used in NRS 125C.203 to 125C.250, inclusive, unless the context otherwise requires, the words and terms defined in NRS 125C.205 and 125C.207 have the meanings ascribed to them in those sections.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.205 “Child custody proceeding” defined.

1. “Child custody proceeding” means a proceeding in which legal custody, physical custody or visitation with respect to a child is at issue. 2. The term includes a proceeding for divorce, separation, paternity, child support, termination of parental rights and protection from domestic violence in which the issue may appear. 3. The term does not include a delinquency proceeding conducted pursuant to title 5 of NRS, a proceeding to terminate parental rights pursuant to chapter 128 of NRS or a proceeding held pursuant to chapter 432B of NRS.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.210 Child conceived as result of sexual assault: Rights of natural father convicted of sexual assault; rights when father is spouse of victim; rebuttable presumption upon divorce.

1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, if a child is conceived as the result of a sexual assault and the person convicted of the sexual assault is the natural father of the child, the person has no right to custody of or visitation with the child unless the natural mother or legal guardian consents thereto and it is in the best interest of the child. 2. The provisions of subsection 1 do not apply if the person convicted of the sexual assault is the spouse of the victim at the time of the sexual assault. If the persons later divorce, the conviction of sexual assault creates a rebuttable presumption that sole or joint custody of the child by the perpetrator of the sexual assault is not in the best interest of the child. The court shall set forth findings that any custody or visitation arrangement ordered by the court adequately protects the child and the victim of the sexual assault.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.215 Denial of custody or visitation on basis of disability or possession of registry identification card prohibited.

1. A court shall not deny custody or visitation rights to a person solely because the person: (a) Is deaf, is blind or has another physical disability; or (b) Is the holder of a valid registry identification card. 2. As used in this section: (a) “Blind” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 426.082 . (b) “Holder of a valid registry identification card” means a person who holds a valid registry identification card as defined in NRS 678C.080 that identifies the person as: (1) Exempt from state prosecution for engaging in the medical use of cannabis; or (2) A designated primary caregiver as defined in NRS 678C.040 .

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.220 Presumptions concerning custody and visitation when parent of child is convicted of first degree murder of other parent of child.

1. The conviction of the parent of a child for murder of the first degree of the other parent of the child creates a rebuttable presumption that sole or joint custody of the child by the convicted parent is not in the best interest of the child. The rebuttable presumption may be overcome only if: (a) The court determines that: (1) There is no other suitable guardian for the child; (2) The convicted parent is a suitable guardian for the child; and (3) The health, safety and welfare of the child are not at risk; or (b) The child is of suitable age to signify his or her assent and assents to the order of the court awarding sole or joint custody of the child to the convicted parent. 2. The conviction of the parent of a child for murder of the first degree of the other parent of the child creates a rebuttable presumption that rights to visitation with the child are not in the best interest of the child and must not be granted if custody is not granted pursuant to subsection 1. The rebuttable presumption may be overcome only if: (a) The court determines that: (1) The health, safety and welfare of the child are not at risk; and (2) It will be beneficial for the child to have visitations with the convicted parent; or (b) The child is of suitable age to signify his or her assent and assents to the order of the court awarding rights to visitation with the child to the convicted parent. 3. Until the court makes a determination pursuant to this section, no person may bring the child into the presence of the convicted parent without the consent of the legal guardian or custodian of the child.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.230 Presumption concerning custody when court determines that parent or other person seeking custody of child is perpetrator of domestic violence.

1. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 125C.210 and 125C.220 , a determination by the court after an evidentiary hearing and finding by clear and convincing evidence that either parent or any other person seeking custody of a child has engaged in one or more acts of domestic violence against the child, a parent of the child or any other person residing with the child creates a rebuttable presumption that sole or joint custody of the child by the perpetrator of the domestic violence is not in the best interest of the child. Upon making such a determination, the court shall set forth: (a) Findings of fact that support the determination that one or more acts of domestic violence occurred; and (b) Findings that the custody or visitation arrangement ordered by the court adequately protects the child and the parent or other victim of domestic violence who resided with the child. 2. If after an evidentiary hearing held pursuant to subsection 1 the court determines that more than one party has engaged in acts of domestic violence, it shall, if possible, determine which person was the primary physical aggressor. In determining which party was the primary physical aggressor for the purposes of this section, the court shall consider: (a) All prior acts of domestic violence involving any of the parties; (b) The relative severity of the injuries, if any, inflicted upon the persons involved in those prior acts of domestic violence; (c) The likelihood of future injury; (d) Whether, during the prior acts, one of the parties acted in self-defense; and (e) Any other factors that the court deems relevant to the determination. Ê In such a case, if it is not possible for the court to determine which party is the primary physical aggressor, the presumption created pursuant to subsection 1 applies to each of the parties. If it is possible for the court to determine which party is the primary physical aggressor, the presumption created pursuant to subsection 1 applies only to the party determined by the court to be the primary physical aggressor.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.240 Presumption concerning custody when court determines that parent or other person seeking custody of child has committed act of abduction against child or any other child.

1. A determination by the court after an evidentiary hearing and finding by clear and convincing evidence that either parent or any other person seeking custody of a child has committed any act of abduction against the child or any other child creates a rebuttable presumption that sole or joint custody or unsupervised visitation of the child by the perpetrator of the abduction is not in the best interest of the child. If the parent or other person seeking custody does not rebut the presumption, the court shall not enter an order for sole or joint custody or unsupervised visitation of the child by the perpetrator and the court shall set forth: (a) Findings of fact that support the determination that one or more acts of abduction occurred; and (b) Findings that the custody or visitation arrangement ordered by the court adequately protects the child and the parent or other person from whom the child was abducted. 2. For purposes of subsection 1, any of the following acts constitute conclusive evidence that an act of abduction occurred: (a) A conviction of the defendant of any violation of NRS 200.310 to 200.340 , inclusive, or 200.359 or a law of any other jurisdiction that prohibits the same or similar conduct; (b) A plea of guilty or nolo contendere by the defendant to any violation of NRS 200.310 to 200.340 , inclusive, or 200.359 or a law of any other jurisdiction that prohibits the same or similar conduct; or (c) An admission by the defendant to the court of the facts contained in the charging document alleging a violation of NRS 200.310 to 200.340 , inclusive, or 200.359 or a law of any other jurisdiction that prohibits the same or similar conduct. 3. If, after a court enters a final order concerning custody of the child, a magistrate determines there is probable cause to believe that an act of abduction has been committed against the child or any other child and that a person who has been awarded sole or joint custody or unsupervised visitation of the child has committed the act, the court shall, upon a motion to modify the order concerning custody, reconsider the previous order concerning custody pursuant to subsections 1 and 2. 4. As used in this section, “abduction” means the commission of an act described in NRS 200.310 to 200.340 , inclusive, or 200.359 or a law of any other jurisdiction that prohibits the same or similar conduct.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.243 Child custody proceedings: Limitations on removal of child from or restriction of contact with parent or litigant for purpose of improving relationship with child; conditions for ordering reunification treatment.

1. During a child custody proceeding, the court shall not: (a) For the sole purpose of improving a deficient relationship between a child and the other parent of the child, remove the child from a parent or litigant or restrict contact between the child and a parent or litigant who: (1) Is capable of meeting the needs of the child; (2) Is protective of the child; (3) Does not physically or sexually abuse the child or neglect the child; and (4) Is a person with whom the child is bonded or to whom the child is attached; or (b) Issue an order requiring a child to receive reunification treatment unless: (1) The court makes specific findings, based on the papers, pleadings and arguments presented, that generally accepted and scientifically valid proof demonstrates that the treatment is: (I) Safe, effective and of therapeutic value; and (II) Will not harm a child; and (2) The reunification treatment is not predicated on isolating a child from a parent who meets the requirements set forth in subparagraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, of paragraph (a) or otherwise prohibiting contact between a child and any such parent. 2. As used in this section, “reunification treatment” means a treatment or therapy aimed at reuniting or reestablishing a relationship between a child and an estranged or rejected parent or other family member of the child.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.245 Child custody proceedings involving alleged domestic violence or child abuse: Admission of expert evidence; required consideration of past conduct; prohibition against orders to remediate resistance of child to contact parent alleged to have committed domestic violence or child abuse.

1. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in a child custody proceeding in which a parent is alleged to have committed domestic violence or child abuse: (a) Expert evidence relating to alleged domestic violence or child abuse may only be admitted by a professional who possesses demonstrated expertise and substantial clinical experience that are not primarily of a forensic nature; (b) The court shall, in making any finding relating to an allegation of domestic violence or child abuse, consider all relevant and admissible evidence of past domestic violence or child abuse committed by the parent who is the subject of the allegation, including, without limitation, any evidence which indicates that the parent has been: (1) Arrested for or convicted of domestic violence or child abuse; or (2) A party against whom an order for protection, restraining order or injunction in the nature of an order for protection is issued; and (c) The court shall not issue an order to remediate the resistance of a child to have contact with a parent alleged to have committed domestic violence or child abuse unless the order: (1) Primarily addresses the behavior of the parent with whom the child resists contact; and (2) Requires the parent with whom the child resists contact to take action to remediate the resistance of the child as a condition precedent to requiring the other parent of the child to take any action to improve the relationship of the child with the parent with whom the child resists contact. 2. For the purposes of this section, an order or injunction is in the nature of a temporary or extended order for protection if it grants relief that might be given in a temporary or extended order for protection. 3. As used in this section: (a) “Child abuse” means: (1) Physical or mental injury of a nonaccidental nature to a child under the age of 18 years; or (2) Sexual abuse or sexual exploitation of a child under the age of 18 years. (b) “Clinical experience” means experience working with and on behalf of victims of domestic violence or child abuse. (c) “Forensic” means provided pursuant to a court order for the purpose of litigation. The term includes, without limitation, the evaluation of a parent or child involved in a child custody proceeding. (d) “Order for protection” means: (1) A temporary or extended order for protection against domestic violence issued pursuant to NRS 33.017 to 33.100 , inclusive; (2) A temporary or extended order for protection against stalking, aggravated stalking or harassment issued pursuant to NRS 200.591 ; or (3) A temporary or extended order for protection against sexual assault issued pursuant to NRS 200.378 . (e) “Sexual abuse” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 432B.100 . (f) “Sexual exploitation” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 432B.110 .

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.247 Administrative Office of the Courts to provide training concerning domestic violence, child abuse and best practices in family court.

1. The Administrative Office of the Courts shall: (a) Include ongoing training regarding domestic violence, child abuse and best practices in family court in the regular education provided by the Office to judges; and (b) To the extent that money is available for this purpose, offer such training to: (1) Other officers of the Judicial Department of the State Government who preside over judicial proceedings involving matters within the jurisdiction of the family court, including, without limitation, magistrates and judicial officers; and (2) Court staff who regularly and routinely interact with persons who are involved in child custody proceedings and exercise discretion or judgment in those interactions. 2. The training provided pursuant to subsection 1 must comply with the applicable requirements of the Violence Against Women Act Reauthorization Act of 2022, Pub. L. No. 117-103, 34 U.S.C. §§ 12291 et seq.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.250 Attorney’s fees and costs.

Except as otherwise provided in NRS 125C.0689, in an action to determine legal custody, physical custody or visitation with respect to a child, the court may order reasonable fees of counsel and experts and other costs of the proceeding to be paid in proportions and at times determined by the court.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0601 Short title.

NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693, inclusive, may be cited as the Uniform Deployed Parents Custody and Visitation Act.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0603 Definitions.

As used in NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693, inclusive, unless the context otherwise requires, the words and terms defined in NRS 125C.0605 to 125C.0639, inclusive, have the meanings ascribed to them in those sections.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0607 “Caretaking authority” defined.

“Caretaking authority” means the right to live with and care for a child on a day-to-day basis, including physical custody, parenting time, right to access and visitation.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0609 “Child” defined.

“Child” means: 1. An unemancipated minor who has not attained 18 years of age; or 2. An adult son or daughter by birth or adoption, or under the laws of this State other than NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693 , inclusive, who is the subject of an existing court order concerning custodial responsibility.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0610 “Civilian employee” defined.

“Civilian employee” means a civilian employee of the United States Department of Defense.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0611 “Close and substantial relationship” defined.

“Close and substantial relationship” means a relationship in which a significant bond exists between a child and a nonparent.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0613 “Court” defined.

“Court” means an entity authorized under the laws of this State other than NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693, inclusive, to establish, enforce or modify a decision regarding custodial responsibility.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0615 “Custodial responsibility” defined.

“Custodial responsibility” is a comprehensive term that includes any and all powers and duties relating to caretaking authority and decision-making authority for a child. The term includes custody, physical custody, legal custody, parenting time, right to access, visitation and the authority to designate limited contact with a child.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0617 “Decision-making authority” defined.

“Decision-making authority” means the power to make important decisions regarding a child, including decisions regarding the child’s education, religious training, health care, extracurricular activities and travel. The term does not include day-to-day decisions that necessarily accompany a grant of caretaking authority.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0619 “Deploying parent” defined.

“Deploying parent” means a service member or civilian employee who is deployed or has been notified of impending deployment, and is: 1. A parent of a child under the laws of this State other than NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693 , inclusive; or 2. A person other than a parent who has custodial responsibility of a child under the laws of this State other than NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693 , inclusive.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0621 “Deployment” defined.

“Deployment” means the movement or mobilization of a service member or civilian employee to a location for more than 90 days but less than 18 months pursuant to an official order that: 1. Is designated as unaccompanied; 2. Does not authorize dependent travel; or 3. Otherwise does not permit the movement of family members to that location.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0623 “Family member” defined.

“Family member” includes a sibling, aunt, uncle, cousin, stepparent or grandparent of a child, and a person recognized to be in a familial relationship with a child under the laws of this State other than NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693, inclusive.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0625 “Limited contact” defined.

“Limited contact” means the opportunity for a nonparent to visit with a child for a limited period of time. The term includes authority to take the child to a place other than the residence of the child.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0629 “Other parent” defined.

“Other parent” means a person who, in common with a deploying parent, is: 1. The parent of a child under the laws of this State other than NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693 , inclusive; or 2. A person other than a parent with custodial responsibility of a child under the laws of this State other than NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693 , inclusive.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0631 “Record” defined.

“Record” means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0633 “Return from deployment” defined.

“Return from deployment” means the conclusion of a service member’s or civilian employee’s deployment as specified in uniformed service orders.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0637 “State” defined.

“State” means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0639 “Uniformed service” defined.

“Uniformed service” means: 1. Active and reserve components of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps or Coast Guard of the United States; 2. The Merchant Marine, the Commissioned Corps of the Public Health Service or the Commissioned Corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the United States; or 3. The National Guard.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0641 Jurisdiction.

1. A court may issue an order regarding custodial responsibility under NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693 , inclusive, only if the court has jurisdiction pursuant to chapter 125A of NRS. If the court has issued a temporary order regarding custodial responsibility pursuant to NRS 125C.0659 to 125C.0677 , inclusive, the residence of the deploying parent is not changed by reason of the deployment for the purposes of chapter 125A of NRS during the deployment. 2. If a court has issued a permanent order regarding custodial responsibility before notice of deployment and the parents modify that order temporarily by agreement pursuant to NRS 125C.0649 to 125C.0657 , inclusive, the residence of the deploying parent is not changed by reason of the deployment for the purposes of chapter 125A of NRS. 3. If a court in another state has issued a temporary order regarding custodial responsibility as a result of impending or current deployment, the residence of the deploying parent is not changed by reason of the deployment for the purposes of chapter 125A of NRS. 4. This section does not prohibit the exercise of temporary emergency jurisdiction by a court under chapter 125A of NRS.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0643 Notice required of deploying parent.

1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 4, and subject to subsection 3, a deploying parent shall notify in a record the other parent of a pending deployment not later than 7 days after receiving notice of deployment unless reasonably prevented from doing so by the circumstances of service. If the circumstances of service prevent such notification within 7 days, such notification must be made as soon as reasonably possible thereafter. 2. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 4, and subject to subsection 3, each parent shall in a record provide the other parent with a plan for fulfilling that parent’s share of custodial responsibility during deployment as soon as reasonably possible after receiving notice of deployment under subsection 1. 3. If an existing court order prohibits disclosure of the address or contact information of the other parent, a notification of deployment under subsection 1, or notification of a plan for custodial responsibility during deployment under subsection 2, may be made only to the issuing court. If the address of the other parent is available to the issuing court, the court shall forward the notification to the other parent. The court shall keep confidential the address or contact information of the other parent. 4. Notice in a record is not required if the parents are living in the same residence and there is actual notice of the deployment or plan. 5. In a proceeding regarding custodial responsibility between parents, a court may consider the reasonableness of a parent’s efforts to comply with this section.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0645 Duty to notify of change of address.

1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, a person to whom custodial responsibility has been assigned or granted during deployment pursuant to NRS 125C.0649 to 125C.0677 , inclusive, shall notify the deploying parent and any other person with custodial responsibility of any change of mailing address or residence until the assignment or grant is terminated. The person shall provide the notice to any court that has issued an existing custody or child support order concerning the child. 2. If an existing court order prohibits disclosure of the address or contact information of a person to whom custodial responsibility has been assigned or granted, a notification of change of mailing address or residence under subsection 1 may be made only to the court that issued the order. The court shall keep confidential the mailing address or residence of the person to whom custodial responsibility has been assigned or granted.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0647 General considerations in custody proceeding of parent’s military service.

In a proceeding for custodial responsibility of a child of a service member or civilian employee, a court may not consider a parent’s past deployment or possible future deployment in itself in determining the best interest of the child, but may consider any significant impact on the best interest of the child of the parent’s past or possible future deployment.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0649 Form of agreement.

1. The parents of a child may enter into a temporary agreement granting custodial responsibility during deployment. 2. An agreement under subsection 1 must be: (a) In writing; and (b) Signed by both parents and any nonparent to whom custodial responsibility is granted. 3. An agreement under subsection 1 may: (a) Identify to the extent feasible the destination, duration and conditions of the deployment that is the basis for the agreement; (b) Specify the allocation of caretaking authority among the deploying parent, the other parent and any nonparent, if applicable; (c) Specify any decision-making authority that accompanies a grant of caretaking authority; (d) Specify any grant of limited contact to a nonparent; (e) If the agreement shares custodial responsibility between the other parent and a nonparent, or between two nonparents, provide a process to resolve any dispute that may arise; (f) Specify the frequency, duration and means, including electronic means, by which the deploying parent will have contact with the child, any role to be played by the other parent in facilitating the contact and allocation of any costs of communications; (g) Specify the contact between the deploying parent and child during the time the deploying parent is on leave or is otherwise available; (h) Acknowledge that any party’s existing child support obligation cannot be modified by the agreement and that changing the terms of the obligation during deployment requires modification in the appropriate court; (i) Provide that the agreement terminates following the deploying parent’s return from deployment according to the procedures under NRS 125C.0679 to 125C.0685 , inclusive; and (j) If the agreement must be filed pursuant to NRS 125C.0657 , specify which parent shall file the agreement.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0651 Nature of authority created by agreement.

1. An agreement under NRS 125C.0649 to 125C.0657 , inclusive, is temporary and terminates pursuant to NRS 125C.0679 to 125C.0685 , inclusive, following the return from deployment of the deployed parent, unless the agreement has been terminated before that time by court order or modification of the agreement under NRS 125C.0653 . The agreement derives from the parents’ custodial responsibility and does not create an independent, continuing right to caretaking authority, decision-making authority or limited contact in a person to whom custodial responsibility is given. 2. A nonparent given caretaking authority, decision-making authority or limited contact by an agreement under NRS 125C.0649 to 125C.0657 , inclusive, has standing to enforce the agreement until it has been terminated pursuant to an agreement of the parents under NRS 125C.0653 , under NRS 125C.0679 to 125C.0685 , inclusive, or by court order.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0653 Modification of agreement.

1. The parents may modify an agreement regarding custodial responsibility made pursuant to NRS 125C.0649 to 125C.0657 , inclusive, by mutual consent. 2. If an agreement is modified under subsection 1 before deployment of a deploying parent, the modification must be in writing and signed by both parents and any nonparent who will exercise custodial responsibility under the modified agreement. 3. If an agreement is modified under subsection 1 during deployment of a deploying parent, the modification must be agreed to in a record by both parents and any nonparent who will exercise custodial responsibility under the modified agreement.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0655 Power of attorney.

If no other parent possesses custodial responsibility under the laws of this State other than NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693, inclusive, or if an existing court order prohibits contact between the child and the other parent, a deploying parent, by power of attorney, may delegate all or part of custodial responsibility to an adult nonparent for the period of deployment. The power of attorney is revocable by the deploying parent through a revocation of the power of attorney signed by the deploying parent.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0657 Filing agreement or power of attorney with court.

An agreement or power of attorney made under NRS 125C.0649 to 125C.0655, inclusive, must be filed within a reasonable period of time with any court that has entered an existing order on custodial responsibility or child support concerning the child. The case number and heading of the existing case concerning custodial responsibility or child support must be provided to the court with the agreement or power of attorney.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0659 Proceeding for temporary custody order.

1. After a deploying parent receives notice of deployment and during the deployment, a court may issue a temporary order granting custodial responsibility unless prohibited by the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, 50 U.S.C. Appx. §§ 521-522. A court may not issue a permanent order granting custodial responsibility without the consent of the deploying parent. 2. At any time after a deploying parent receives notice of deployment, either parent may file a motion regarding custodial responsibility of a child during deployment. The motion must be filed in an existing proceeding for custodial responsibility of the child with jurisdiction under NRS 125C.0641 or, if there is no existing proceeding in a court with jurisdiction under NRS 125C.0641 , in a new action for granting custodial responsibility during deployment.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0661 Expedited hearing.

If a motion to grant custodial responsibility is filed before a deploying parent deploys, the court shall conduct an expedited hearing.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0663 Testimony by electronic means.

In a proceeding brought under NRS 125C.0659 to 125C.0677, inclusive, a party or witness who is not reasonably available to appear personally may appear and provide testimony and present evidence by electronic means unless the court finds good cause to require a personal appearance.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0665 Effect of prior judicial decree or agreement.

In a proceeding for a grant of custodial responsibility pursuant to NRS 125C.0659 to 125C.0677, inclusive, the following rules apply: 1. A prior judicial order designating custodial responsibility of a child in the event of deployment is binding on the court unless the circumstances meet the requirements of the laws of this State other than NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693 , inclusive, for modifying a judicial order regarding custodial responsibility. 2. The court shall enforce a prior written agreement between the parents for designating custodial responsibility of a child in the event of deployment, including a prior written agreement executed under NRS 125C.0649 to 125C.0657 , inclusive, unless the court finds the agreement contrary to the best interest of the child.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0667 Grant of caretaking or decision-making authority to nonparent.

1. On the motion of a deploying parent and in accordance with the laws of this State other than NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693 , inclusive, a court may grant caretaking authority of a child to a nonparent who is an adult family member of the child or an adult with whom the child has a close and substantial relationship if it is in the best interest of the child. 2. In determining whether to grant caretaking authority of a child to a nonparent pursuant to subsection 1, the court shall consider the following factors: (a) The love, affection and other emotional ties existing between the nonparent and the child. (b) The capacity and disposition of the nonparent to: (1) Give the child love, affection and guidance and serve as a role model to the child; (2) Provide the child with food, clothing and other material needs; and (3) Provide the child with health care or alternative health care which is recognized and authorized pursuant to the laws of this State. (c) The prior relationship between the nonparent and the child, including, without limitation, whether the child has previously resided with the nonparent and whether the child was previously included in holidays or family gatherings with the nonparent. (d) The moral fitness of the nonparent. (e) The mental and physical health of the nonparent. (f) The reasonable preference of the child if the child has a preference and if the court determines that the child is of sufficient maturity to express a preference. (g) The willingness and ability of the nonparent to facilitate and encourage a close and substantial relationship between the child and his or her deploying parent, other parent and family members. (h) The medical and other health needs of the child which are affected by the grant of caretaking authority. (i) The support provided by the nonparent, including, without limitation, whether the nonparent has contributed to the financial support of the child. (j) Any objection by the other parent to the grant of caretaking authority to a nonparent. In the case of an objection by the other parent, there is a rebuttable presumption that the grant of caretaking authority to a nonparent is not in the best interest of the child. To rebut this presumption, the deploying parent must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the grant of caretaking authority to the nonparent is in the best interest of the child. 3. Unless the grant of caretaking authority to a nonparent under subsection 1 is agreed to by the other parent, the grant is limited to an amount of time not greater than: (a) The time granted to the deploying parent in an existing permanent custody order, except that the court may add unusual travel time necessary to transport the child; or (b) In the absence of an existing permanent custody order, the amount of time that the deploying parent habitually cared for the child before being notified of deployment, except that the court may add unusual travel time necessary to transport the child. 4. A court may grant part of the deploying parent’s decision-making authority for a child to a nonparent who is an adult family member of the child or an adult with whom the child has a close and substantial relationship if the deploying parent is unable to exercise that authority. When a court grants the authority to a nonparent, the court shall specify the decision-making powers that will and will not be granted, including applicable health, educational and religious decisions.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0669 Grant of limited contact.

On the motion of a deploying parent and in accordance with the laws of this State other than NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693, inclusive, a court shall grant limited contact with a child to a nonparent who is either a family member of the child or a person with whom the child has a close and substantial relationship, unless the court finds that the contact would be contrary to the best interest of the child.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0671 Nature of authority created by order.

1. A grant made pursuant to NRS 125C.0659 to 125C.0677 , inclusive, is temporary and terminates pursuant to NRS 125C.0679 to 125C.0685 , inclusive, following the return from deployment of the deployed parent, unless the grant has been terminated before that time by court order. The grant does not create an independent, continuing right to caretaking authority, decision-making authority or limited contact in a person to whom it is granted. 2. A nonparent granted caretaking authority, decision-making authority or limited contact under NRS 125C.0659 to 125C.0677 , inclusive, has standing to enforce the grant until it is terminated under NRS 125C.0679 to 125C.0685 , inclusive, or by court order.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0673 Content of temporary custody order.

1. An order granting custodial responsibility under NRS 125C.0659 to 125C.0677 , inclusive, must: (a) Designate the order as temporary; and (b) Identify to the extent feasible the destination, duration and conditions of the deployment. 2. If applicable, a temporary order for custodial responsibility must: (a) Specify the allocation of caretaking authority, decision-making authority or limited contact among the deploying parent, the other parent and any nonparent; (b) If the order divides caretaking or decision-making authority between persons, or grants caretaking authority to one person and limited contact to another, provide a process to resolve any significant dispute that may arise; (c) Provide for liberal communication between the deploying parent and the child during deployment, including through electronic means, unless contrary to the best interest of the child, and allocate any costs of communications; (d) Provide for liberal contact between the deploying parent and the child during the time the deploying parent is on leave or is otherwise available, unless contrary to the best interest of the child; (e) Provide for reasonable contact between the deploying parent and the child following return from deployment until the temporary order is terminated, which may include more time than the deploying parent spent with the child before entry of the temporary order; and (f) Provide that the order will terminate following return from deployment according to the procedures under NRS 125C.0679 to 125C.0685 , inclusive.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0675 Order for child support.

If a court has issued an order granting caretaking authority under NRS 125C.0659 to 125C.0677, inclusive, or an agreement granting caretaking authority has been executed under NRS 125C.0649 to 125C.0657, inclusive, the court may enter a temporary order for child support consistent with the laws of this State other than NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693, inclusive, if the court has jurisdiction under NRS 130.0902 to 130.802, inclusive.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0677 Modifying or terminating grant of custodial responsibility to nonparent.

1. Except for an order in accordance with NRS 125C.0665 or as otherwise provided in subsection 2, and consistent with the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, 50 U.S.C. Appx. §§ 521-522, on the motion of a deploying or other parent or any nonparent to whom caretaking authority, decision-making authority or limited contact has been granted, the court may modify or terminate a grant of caretaking authority, decision-making authority or limited contact made pursuant to NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693 , inclusive, if the modification or termination is consistent with NRS 125C.0659 to 125C.0677 , inclusive, and the court finds it is in the best interest of the child. Any modification must be temporary and terminates following the conclusion of deployment of the deployed parent according to the procedures under NRS 125C.0679 to 125C.0685 , inclusive, unless the grant has been terminated before that time by court order. 2. On the motion of a deploying parent, the court shall terminate a grant of limited contact.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0679 Procedure for terminating temporary grant of custodial responsibility established by agreement.

1. At any time following return from deployment, a temporary agreement granting custodial responsibility under NRS 125C.0649 to 125C.0657 , inclusive, may be terminated by an agreement to terminate signed by the deploying parent and the other parent. 2. The temporary agreement granting custodial responsibility terminates: (a) If the agreement to terminate specifies a date for termination, on that date; or (b) If the agreement to terminate does not specify a date, on the date the agreement to terminate is signed by both parents. 3. In the absence of an agreement to terminate, the temporary agreement granting custodial responsibility terminates 60 days after the date of the deploying parent’s giving notice to the other parent of having returned from deployment. 4. If the temporary agreement granting custodial responsibility was filed with a court pursuant to NRS 125C.0657 , an agreement to terminate the temporary agreement must also be filed with that court within a reasonable period of time after the signing of the agreement. The case number and heading of the existing custodial responsibility or child support case must be provided to the court with the agreement to terminate.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0681 Consent procedure.

At any time following return from deployment, the deploying parent and the other parent may file with the court an agreement to terminate a temporary order for custodial responsibility issued under NRS 125C.0659 to 125C.0677, inclusive. After an agreement has been filed, the court shall issue an order terminating the temporary order on the date specified in the agreement. If no date is specified, the court shall issue the order immediately.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0683 Visitation before termination of temporary grant of custodial responsibility.

Following return from deployment of a deploying parent until a temporary agreement or order for custodial responsibility established under NRS 125C.0649 to 125C.0677, inclusive, is terminated, the court shall enter a temporary order granting the deploying parent reasonable contact with the child unless it is contrary to the best interest of the child, even if the time exceeds the time the deploying parent spent with the child before deployment.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0685 Termination by operation of law of temporary grant of custodial responsibility established by court order.

1. A temporary order for custodial responsibility issued under NRS 125C.0659 to 125C.0677 , inclusive, shall terminate, if no agreement between the parties to terminate a temporary order for custodial responsibility has been filed, 60 days after the date of the deploying parent’s giving notice of having returned from deployment to the other parent and any nonparent granted custodial responsibility. 2. Any proceedings seeking to prevent termination of a temporary order for custodial responsibility are governed by the laws of this State other than NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693 , inclusive.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0687 Court may hold expedited hearing upon motion alleging immediate danger of irreparable harm.

The court may, upon a motion alleging immediate danger of irreparable harm to the child, hold an expedited hearing concerning custody or visitation following the deploying parent’s return from deployment.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0689 Costs and attorney’s fees.

In addition to other relief provided by the laws of this State other than NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693, inclusive, if a court finds that a party to a proceeding under NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693, inclusive, has acted in bad faith or intentionally failed to comply with NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693, inclusive, or a court order issued under NRS 125C.0601 to 125C.0693, inclusive, the court may assess reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of the opposing party and order other appropriate relief.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0691 Uniformity of application and construction.

In applying and construing this uniform act, consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.0693 Relation to Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act.

This act modifies, limits and supersedes the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7001 et seq., but does not modify, limit or supersede § 101(c) of that act, 15 U.S.C. § 7001(c), or authorize electronic delivery of any of the notices described in § 103(b) of that act, 15 U.S.C. § 7003(b).
Source: NV Statutes (Official Site)URL: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/NRS-125C.htmlFetched: 10/4/2026