FILE NO. 170834
AMENDED IN BOARD
10/17/2017
ORDINANCE NO.
208-17
[Planning Code - lnclusionary Affordable Housing Fee and Dv.'elling Unit Mix Requirements]
Ordinance amending the Planning Code to revise the amount of the lnclusionary
Affordable Housing Fee and the On-Site and Off-Site Affordable Housing Alternatives
and other lnclusionary Housing requirements; adding reporting requirements for
density bonus projects to require minimum d•.-Jelling unit mix in most residential
districts; to clarify lnclusionary Housing requirements in the Transbay C-3 Special Use
District; affirming the Planning Department's determination under the California
Environmental Quality Act; making findings of public necessity. convenience. and
1 O
welfare under Planning Code, Section 302; and making findings of consistency with the
General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1.
NOTE:
Unchanged Code text and uncodified text are in plain Arial font.
Additions to Codes are in single-underline italics Times New Roman font.
Deletions to Codes are in strikethrough italics Times NerF Roman font.
Board amendment additions are in double-underlined Arial font.
Board amendment deletions are in strikethrough Arial font.
Asterisks (* * * *) indicate the omission of unchanged Code
subsections or parts of tables.
Be it ordained by the People of the City and County of San Francisco:
Section 1. General Findings.
(a) The Planning Department has determined that the actions contemplated in this
ordinance comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources
Code Sections 21000 et seq.). Said determination is on file with the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors in File No. 170834 and is incorporated herein by reference. The Board affirms
this determination.
Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Page 1
(b) On April 27, 2017, and on July 6. 2017. the Planning Commission, in Resolution
No,§,. 19903 and 19956, adopted findings that the actions contemplated in this ordinance are
consistent, on balance, with the City's General Plan and eight priority policies of Planning
Code Section 101.1. The Board adopts these findings as its own. A copy of said Resolution,§,
is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in File No. 170834, and ffi are incorporated
herein by reference.
(c) Pursuant to Planning Code Section 302, this Board finds that this Planning Code
Amendment will serve the public necessity, convenience, and welfare for the reasons set forth
in Planning Commission Resolution No,§,. 19903 and 19956, and the Board incorporates such
1 O
reasons herein by reference. A copy of Planning Commission Resolution No,§,. 19903 and
19956 is on file with the Board of Supervisors in File No. 170834.
Section 2. Findings About lnclusionary Affordable Housing Requirements.
(a) The purpose of this ordinance is to adopt inclusionary or affordable housing
obligations following voter approval of Proposition Cat the June 7, 2016 election to revise the
City Charter's inclusionary affordable housing requirements, which won overwhelming support
with 67 .9% of the vote, and to update the provisions of the Planning Code that became
effective after the Charter Amendment passed, consistent with the process set forth in Section
415.10 of the Planning Code. and elaborated upon further outlined in Ordinance No. 76-16,
which required that the City study how to set inclusionarv housing obligations in San
Francisco at the maximum economically feasible amount in market rate housing development
to create affordable housing. The inclusionarv affordable housing obligations set forth in this
ordinance will supersede and replace any previous requirements.
(b) The San Francisco residential real estate market is one of the most expensive in
the United States. In February 2016, the California Association of Realtors reported that the
Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Page2
median priced home in San Francisco was $1,437,500. This price is 222% higher than the
State of California median ($446,460), and 312% higher than the national average
($348,900). While the national homeownership rate is approximately 63.8%, only
approximately 37% of San Franciscans own their own home. The majority of market-rate
homes for sale in San Francisco are priced out of the reach of low;;; and moderate;;;-income
households. In 2015, the average rent was $3,524, which is affordable to households earning
over $126,864.
(c) The Board of Supervisors adopted San Francisco's General Plan Housing Element
in March 2015, and the California Housing and Community Development Department certified
1 O
it on May 29, 2015. The Housing Element states that San Francisco's share of the regional
housing need for years 2015 through 2022 includes 10,873 housing units for very-low;;; and
low-income households and 5,460 units for moderate/middle-income households, and a total
production of 28,870 net new units, with almost 60% to be affordable for very-low, low- and
moderate/middle-income San Franciscans.
(d) In November 2016, the City provided the updated Residential Affordable Housing
Nexus Analysis that confirms and quantifies the impact of new market rate housing
development on the demand for affordable housing for households earning up to 120% of
area median income. The study demonstrates a need of 31.8% affordable housing for rental
housing, and 37 .6% affordable housing for ownership housing, and a need of 24.1 % onsite
affordable housing for r~ntal housing, and 27.3% onsite affordable housing for ownership
housing for households with incomes up to 120% of Area Median Income. When quantitving
affordable housing impacts on households making up to 150% of area median income. the
study demonstrates a need of 34.9% affordable housing for rental housing. and a need of
41.3% affordable housing for ownership housing.
Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Page
(e) In February 2017, the Office of the Controller presented a study of the economic
feasibility of increased inclusionary housing requirements, entitled "lnclusionary Housing
Working Group: Final Report." The Controller's Office, supported by a contracted consulting
team of three firms and advised by a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) with
representatives appointed by the Mayor and Board of SupervisorsController, developed
several policy recommendations, including: (1) that the City should impose different
inclusionary housing requirements on rental and for-sale (condominium) properties; (2) that
the City oot1-1€1-can set the initial onsite requirements at a maximum feasible amount of 18% for
rental projects and 20% for ownership projects; (3) that the City may adoptshould commit to a
1 O
15-year schedule of increases to the inclusionary housing rate, at a rate of 0.5% increase
each year; and (4) that the City should revise the schedule of lnclusionary housing fees to
provide a more equivalent cost for developers as the on-site requirements. The Controller's
Office recommended updating the fee percentage to 23% and 28% to create an equivalency
to the recommended 18% and 20% on-site requirements, with the City conducting the specific
calculation of the fee itself.
(f) The Controller's Report further acknowledged that if either the state density bonus
or a local bonus program were widely implemented in San Francisco. the likely result would
be higher residual land values in many locations. which would support a higher inclusionary
requirement. application of the state provided density bonus could make a difference in the
financial feasibility of housing development projects.
(g) The City's lnclusionarv Affordable Housing Program is intended to help address the
demonstrated need for affordable housing in the City through the application of the City's land
use controls
Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Page4
(h) As rents and sales prices outpace what is affordable to the typical San Francisco
family. the City. faces a continuing shortage of affordable housing for not only verv low- and
low-income residents. but also for moderate, middle and upper-middle income families.
(i) In order to maximize the benefit of state and federal funds supporting affordable
housing construction, which are typically restricted to verv low- and low-income households.
and to maximize the amount of affordable units constructed, the majority of the City's new
affordable housing production is likely to continue to focus on households at or below 60% of
area median income.
(i) The Board of Supervisors recognizes that this lnclusionarv Housing Program is only
1 O
one small part of the City's overall strategy for providing affordable housing to verv low-, low-,
moderate-, and middle-income households. The City will continue to acquire, rehabilitate and
produce units through the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development, provide
rental subsidies, and provide homeownership assistance to continue to expand its reach to
households in need of affordable housing.
(k) The City will also continue to pursue innovative solutions to provide and stabilize
affordable housing in San Francisco, including programs such as HOME-SF that incentivize
projects that set aside 30% of on-site units as permanently affordable, and 40% of units as
family-friendly multiple bedroom units.
!!Lin an effort to support a mix of both ownership project and rental projects, the City is
providing a direct financial contribution to project sponsors who agree to rent units for a period
of 30 years. The direct financial contribution is in the form of a reduction in the applicable
affordable housing requirement.
Section 3. The Planning Code is hereby amended by revising Sections 415.3± a00
415.6, and 415.7, to read as follows:
Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Page 5
SEC. 415.3. APPLICATION.
* * * *
(b) Any development project that has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation
application prior to January 12, 2016 shall comply with the Affordable Housing Fee
requirements, the on-site affordable housing requirements or the off-site affordable housing
requirements, and all other provisions of Section 415.1 et seq., as applicable, in effect on
January 12, 2016. For development projects that have submitted a complete Environmental
Evaluation application on or after January 1, 2013, the requirements set forth in Planning
Code Sections 415.5, 415.6, and 415. 7 shall apply to certain development projects consisting
of 25 dwelling units or more during a limited period of time as follows.
(1) If a development project is eligible and elects to provide on-site affordable
housing, the development project shall provide the following amounts of on-site affordable
housing. All other requirements of Planning Code Sections 415.1 et seq. shall apply.
(A) Any development project that has submitted a complete
Environmental Evaluation application prior to January 1, 2014 shall provide affordable units in
the amount of 13% of the number of units constructed on-site.
(B) Any development project that has submitted a complete
Environmental Evaluation application prior to January 1, 2015 shall provide affordable units in
the amount of 13.5% of the number of units constructed on-site.
(C) Any development project that has submitted a complete
Environmental Evaluation application on or prior to January 12, 2016 shall provide affordable
units in the amount of 14.5% of the number of units constructed on-site.
(D) Any development project that submits an Environmental Evaluation
application after January 12, 2016, shall comply with the requirements set forth in Planning
Code Sections 415.5, 415.6 and 415.7, as applicable.
Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Page6
(E) Notwithstanding the provisions set forth in subsections (b)(1)(A), (B)
and (C) of this Section 415.3, if a development project is located in a UMU Zoning District or
in the South of Market Youth and Family Zoning District, and is eligible and elects to provide
on-site units pursuant to Section 415.5(g), such development project shall comply with the on-
site requirements applicable within such Zoning Districts, as they existed on January 12,
2016, plus the following additional amounts of on-site affordable units: (i) if the development
project has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application prior to January 1,
2014, the Project Sponsor shall provide additional affordable units in the amount of 1 % of the
number of units constructed on-site; (ii) if the development project has submitted a complete
1 O
Environmental Evaluation application prior to January 1, 2015, the Project Sponsor shall
provide additional affordable units in the amount of 1.5% of the number of units constructed
on-site; or (iii) if the development project has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation
application on or prior to January 12, 2016, the Project Sponsor shall provide additional
affordable units in the amount of 2% of the number of units constructed on-site.
(F) Any development project that has submitted a complete
Environmental Evaluation application on or before January 12, 2016 and seeks to utilize a
density bonus under State Law shall use its best efforts to provide on-site affordable units in
the amount of 25% of the number of units constructed on-site and shall consult with the
Planning Department about how to achieve this amount of inclusionary affordable housing. An
applicant seeking a density bonus under the provisions of State Law shall provide reasonable
documentation to establish eligibility for a requested density bonus, incentives or concessions,
and waivers or reductions of development standards.
(2) If a development project pays the Affordable Housing Fee or is eligible and
elects to provide off-site affordable housing, the development project shall provide the
following fee amount or amounts of off-site affordable housing during the limited periods of
Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Page 7
time set forth below. All other requirements of Planning Code Sections 415.1 et seq. shall
apply.
(A) Any development project that has submitted a complete
Environmental Evaluation application prior to January 1, 2014, shall pay a fee or provide off-
site housing in an amount equivalent to 25% of the number of units constructed on-site.
(B) Any development project that has submitted a complete
Environmental Evaluation application prior to January 1, 2015, shall pay a fee or provide off-
site housing in an amount equivalent to 27.5% of the number of units constructed on-site.
(C) Any development project that has submitted a complete
1 O
Environmental Evaluation application on or prior to January 12, 2016 shall pay a fee or
provide off-site housing in an amount equivalent to 30% of the number of units constructed
on-site.
(D) Any development project that submits an Environmental Evaluation
application after January 12, 2016 shall comply with the requirements set forth in Sections
415.5, 415.6, and 415.7, as applicable.
(E) Notwithstanding the provisions set forth in subsections (b )(2)(A), (B)
and (C) of this Section 415.3, for development projects proposing buildings over 120 feet in
height, as measured under the requirements set forth in the Planning Code, except for
buildings up to 130 feet in height located both within a special use district and within a height
and bulk district that allows a maximum building height of 130 feet, such development projects
shall pay a fee or provide off-site housing in an amount equivalent to 30% of the number of
units constructed on-site. Any buildings up to 130 feet in height located both within a special
use district and within a height and bulk district that allows a maximum building height of 130
feet shall comply with the provisions of subsections (b )(2)(A), (B) and (C) of this Section 415.3
during the limited periods of time set forth therein.
Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Page 8
(F) Notwithstanding the provisions set forth in subsections (b)(2)(A), (B)
and (C) of this sSection 415.3, if a development project is located in a UMU Zoning District or
in the South of Market Youth and Family Zoning District, and pays the Affordable Housing
or is eligible and elects to provide off-site affordable housing pursuant to Section 415.5(g), or
elects to comply with a land dedication alternative, such development project shall comply
with the fee, off-site or land dedication requirements applicable within such Zoning Districts,
as they existed on January 12, 2016, plus the following additional amounts for the Affordable
Housing Fee or for land dedication or off-site affordable units: (i) if the development project
has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application prior to January 1, 2014, the
1 O
Project Sponsor shall pay an additional fee, or provide additional land dedication or off-site
affordable units, in an amount equivalent to 5% of the number of units constructed on-site; (ii)
if the development project has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application
prior to January 1, 2015, the Project Sponsor shall pay an additional fee, or provide additional
land dedication or off-site affordable units, in an amount equivalent to 7.5% of the number of
units constructed on-site; or (iii) if the development project has submitted a complete
Environmental Evaluation application on or prior to January 12, 2016, the Project Sponsor
shall pay an additional fee, or provide additional land dedication or off-site affordable units, in
an amount equivalent to 10% of the number of units constructed on-site. Notwithstanding the .
foregoing, a development project shall not pay a fee or provide off-site units in a total amount
greater than the equivalent of 30% of the number of units constructed on-site.
(G) Any development project consisting of 25 dwelling units or more that
has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application on or prior to January 12,
2016, and is eligible and elects to provide off-site affordable housing, may provide off-site
affordable housing by acquiring an existing building to fulfill all or part of the requirements set
forth in this Section 415.3 and in Section 415.7 with an equivalent amount of units as
Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Page
·2
in this Section 415.3(b )(2), as reviewed and approved by the Mayor's Office of Housing and
Community Development and consistent with the parameters of its Small Sites Acquisition
and Rehabilitation Program, in conformance with the income limits for the Small Sites
Program.
*
*
*
*
(d) Notwithstanding the provisions set forth in Section 415.3(b), or the inclusionary
affordable housing requirements contained in Sections 415.5, 415.6, and 415.7, such
requirements shall not apply to any project. consisting of 25 dwelling units or more. that has
not submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation Application on or before January 12,
2016, if the project is located within the Eastern Neighborhoods Mission Planning Area, the
North of Market Residential Special Use District Subarea 1 or Subarea 2, or the SOMA
Neighborhood Commercial Transit District, because inclusionary affordable housing levels for
those areas will be addressed in forthcoming area plan processes or an equivalent community
planning process. Until such planning processes are complete and new inclusionary housing
requirements for projects in those areas are adopted, projects consisting of 25 dwelling units
or more shall (1) pay a fee or provide off-site housing in an amount equivalent to 30% if the
principal housing project is a Rental Housing Project. or 33% if the principal housing project
consists of Owned Units, or (2) provide affordable units in the amount of 25% of the number
Rental Units constructed on-site or 27% of the number of Owned Units constructed on-site.
For Rental Units, 15% of the on-site affordable units shall be affordable to low-income
households, 5% shall be affordable to moderate-income households and 5% shall be
affordable to middle-income households.=For Owned Units, 15% of the on-site affordable
units shall be affordable to low-income households, 6% shall be affordable to moderate-
income households and 6% shall be affordable to middle-income households.
* * * *
Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Page 10
SEC. 415.6. ON-SITE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ALTERNATIVE.
If a project sponsor is eligible and elects to provide on-site units pursuant to Section
415.5(g), the development project shall meet the following requirements:
(a) Number of Units. The number of units constructed on-site shall be as follows:
* * * *
(8) Specific Geographic Areas. For any housing development that is located
in an area with a specific affordable housing requirement set forth in a Special Use District or
in any other section of the Code such as Section 419, the higher housing requirement shall
apply. The Planning Department, in consultation with the Controller, shall undertake a study
of areas greater than 5 acres in size. where an Area Plan, Special Use District, or other re-
zoning is being considered for adoption, or has been adopted, after January 1, 2015, to
determine whether a higher on-site inclusionary affordable housing requirement is feasible on
sites that have received a 20% or greater increase in developable residential gross floor area
or a 35% or greater increase in_residential density over prior zoning, and shall submit such
information to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors.
* * * *
SEC. 415.7. OFF-SITE AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
* * * *
(f) Individual affordable units constructed as part of a larger off-site project under this
Section 415.7 shall not receive development subsidies from any Federal, State or local
program established for the purpose of providing affordable housing, and shall not be counted
to satisfy any affordable housing requirement for the off-site development. Other units in the
same off-site project may receive such subsidies. In addition, subsidies may be used, only
Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Page 11
with the express written permission by MOHCD, to deepen the affordability of an affordable
unit beyond the level of affordability required by this Program.
(g) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 415. 7 (f) above, a project may use
California Debt Limit Allocation Committee (CDLAC) tax-exempt bond financing and 4%
credits under the Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) to help fund its obligations under
this ordinance as long as the project provides affordable units as required by CDL/\C and
TC/\C. 2-a% at least 60% of the off-site affordable units as affordable to households at W%
55% of area median income for off site housing, and the balance of the off-site affordable
units using these funds at affordability rates that comply with the requirements of TCAC,
1 O
CDLAC, and this Section 415. The income table to be used for such projects when the units
are priced at W% 55% of area median income is the income table used by MOHCD for the
lnclusionarv Housing Program, not that used by TCAC or CDLAC. Except as provided in this
subsection !91. all units provided under this Section 415. 7 must meet all of the requirements
this ordinance and the Procedures Manual for off-site housing.
Section 4. The Planning Code is hereby amended by revising Section 249.28, to read
as follows:
SEC. 249.28. TRANSBAY C-3 SPECIAL USE DISTRICT.
(a) Purpose. There shall be a Transbay C-3 Special Use District, which is wholly
within the Transbay Redevelopment Project Area, comprising all of the parcels, primarily
privately-owned and zoned C-3, within the Redevelopment Area but outside of the Transbay
Downtown Residential District (TB-DTR), and whose boundaries are designated on Sectional
Map No. ISU of the Zoning Map of the City and County of San Francisco. This district is
generally bounded by Mission, Second, Clementina, and Beale Streets and whose primary
features include the Transbay Terminal facility and its associated ramps, and a portion of the
Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Page 12
New Montgomery/Second Street Conservation District. A vision and guidelines for this area
as an integral component of the Transbay Redevelopment Area are laid out in the Transbay
Redevelopment Plan and its companion documents, including the Design for the
Development and the Development Controls and Design Guidelines for the Transbay
Redevelopment Project. California Public Resources Code Section 5027.1 requires that 35%
of all dwelling units developed during the life of the Transbay Redevelopment Plan in the
Transbay Redevelopment Project Area shall be permanently affordable to low- and moderate-
income households. as such households are defined in State law. Section 4.9.3 of the
Transbay Redevelopment Plan requires that a minimum of 15% of all units constructed on a
1 O
particular site shall be affordable to certain qualitving households. as set forth in such Plan.
(b) Controls.
* * * *
(6) Housing Requirements for Residential and Live/Work Development Projects.
The requirements of Section 415. 1 et seq. shall apply" subject to the following exceptions:
(A) A minimum of 15% of all units The inclusionarv affordable housing
provided on-site shall be the higher amount determined under Section 4.9.3 of the Transbay
Redevelopment Plan or Section 415.6(a) of the Planning Code. as it may be amended from
time to time: and the inclusionarv affordable housing constructed on the site shall be
affordable to, and occupied by, :qualifying persons and families~ as defined by Section 4.9.3
of the Transbay Redevelopment Plan;
(B) All required inclusionary affordable housing units in the Transbay C-3
SUD required by this Section shall be built on-site; and
(C) Off site construction or in lieu fee payment Payment of the Affordable
Housing Fee or compliance with the Off-Site Affordable Housing Alternative are shall not be
permitted to satisfy tfH&-the inclusionarv affordable housing requirement.
Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Page 13
Section e§. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after
enactment. Enactment occurs when the Mayor signs the ordinance, the Mayor returns the
ordinance unsigned or does not sign the ordinance within ten days of receiving it, or the Board
of Supervisors overrides the Mayor's veto of the ordinance.
Section +§. Scope of Ordinance. In enacting this ordinance, the Board of Supervisors
intends to amend only those words, phrases, paragraphs, subsections, sections, articles,
numbers, punctuation marks, charts, diagrams, or any other constituent parts of the Municipal
1 O
Code that are explicitly shown in this ordinance as additions, deletions, Board amendment
additions, and Board amendment deletions in accordance with the "Note" that appears under
the official title of the ordinance.
By:
n:\legana\as2017\1700109\01227419.docx
Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Page 14
City and County of San Francisco
Tails
Ordinance
- CityHall
I Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, CA 94102-4689
File Number:
170834
Date Passed: October 24, 2017
Ordinance amending the Planning Code to revise the amount of the lnclusionary Affordable Housing
Fee and the On-Site and Off-Site Affordable Housing Alternatives and other lnclusionary Housing
requirements; to clarify lnclusionary Housing requirements in the Transbay C-3 Special Use District;
affirming the Planning Department's determination under the California Environmental Quality Act;
making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302;
and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning
Code, Section 1O1. 1.
July 18, 2017 Board of Supervisors - AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE
BEARING SAME TITLE
.
Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy,
Tang and Yee
July 18, 2017 Board of Supervisors -AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE
BEARING SAME TITLE
Ayes: 11 • Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy,
Tang and Yee
July 18, 2017 Board of Supervisors - PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED
Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy,
Tang and Yee·
July 25, 2017 Board of Supervisors -AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE
BEARING SAME TITLE
Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy,
Tang and Yee
July 25, 2017 Board of Supervisors - PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED
Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy,
Tang and Yee
September 05, 2017 Board of Supervisors - CONTINUED ON FINAL PASSAGE
Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy,
Tang and Yee
September 12, 2017 Board of Supervisors -AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE
WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE
Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy,
Tang and Yee
September 12, 2017 Board of Supervisors - PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED
Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy,
Tang ar.id Yee
City and County of San Frm1cisco
Pages
Printed at 2:07 pm on 10125/17
September 19, 2017 Board of Supervisors - CONTINUED ON FINAL PASSAGE
Ayes: 7 - Breed, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Sheehy and Yee
Excused: 4 - Cohen, Farrell, Safai and Tang
September 26, 2017 Board of Supervisors -AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE
WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE
Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy,
Tang and Yee
September 26, 2017 Board of Supervisors - PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED
Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy,
Tang and Yee
October 03, 2017 Board of Supervisors -AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE
BEARING SAME TITLE
Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy,
Tang and Yee
October 03, 2017 Board of Supervisors - PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED
Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy,
Tang and Yee
October 17, 2017 Board of Supervisors -AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE
BEARING SAME TITLE
Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy,
Tang and Yee
October 17, 2017 Board of Supervisors - PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED
Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy,
Tang and Yee
October 24, 2017 Board of Supervisors - FINALLY PASSED
City and County of San Francisco
Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy,
Tang and Yee
Page6
Printed at 2:07 pm on I 0/25117
File No. 170834
City a11d County of Sa11 Francisco
Page 7
I hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance was FINALLY PASSED on
10/24/2017 by the Board of Supervisors of
the City arid County of San Francisco.
Angela Calvillo
Clerk of the Board
Date Approved
Printed at 2:07 pm 011 I 0/25117
