304.8

SEC. 304.8. REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR PROJECTS IN THE 530 SANSOME MIXED-USE TOWER AND FIRE STATION SPECIAL USE DISTRICT. (a) Intent. This Section 304.8 establishes a comprehensive and consolidated public review process through which the Planning Commission shall review development projects in the

530 Sansome Mixed-Use Tower and Fire Station Special Use District (the SUD). (b) Applicability. The provisions of this Section 304.8 shall apply to any development project within the SUD regulated by Planning Code Section 249.11. (c) Conditional Use Authorization. The Planning Commission may approve a conditional use authorization for any mix of proposed uses and authorize any exceptions to the Planning Code reasonably necessary to implement a proposed development project, including exceptions from the standards, procedures, and requirements of Articles 1.2, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, and 6 of the Planning Code, except as described in Section 304.8(e). (d) Approval. The Planning Commission may act on a proposed conditional use authorization in a single action regardless of the number of distinct properties involved or approvals that would otherwise be required under Article 3 of the Planning Code, except as provided in Section 304.8(e). For avoidance of doubt, development projects that obtain a conditional use authorization under this Section 304.8 shall not be required to obtain a separate authorization under Section 309 or Section 303. (e) Criteria and Limitations. A proposed development project must meet the criteria applicable to conditional uses as stated in Section 303(c)(1) through (4). In addition, the project shall: (1) On balance, affirmatively promote applicable objectives and policies of the General Plan; (2) Under no circumstances be excepted from any height limit established by the applicable Height & Bulk District Map. Deviations from the measurement and exemption provisions of Section 260 shall be consistent with the purposes and intent of Section 260, provided there is no limit on deviations from percentage coverage limitations in Section 260(b); (3) Obtain any applicable Project Authorization, as that term is defined in Section 320(n), for proposed office uses required under Sections 321 and 322; (4) Require a hearing (including, as necessary, a joint hearing before the Planning Commission and Recreation and Park Commission) as necessary to comply with Section 295; (5) Under no circumstances include a General Advertising Sign; (6) Except as to any modifications agreed to in a development agreement for the project under Chapter 56 of the Administrative Code, comply with Article 4 of the Planning Code; and (7) Comply with the provisions of Section 249.11. (f) Modifications to Conditional Use Authorization. In granting a conditional use authorization under this Section 304.8, the Planning Commission may authorize the Planning Director to approve proposed modifications to the conditional use authorization, including proposed changes of use and exceptions from the Planning Code in accordance with subsection (c), that the Planning Director reasonably determines are within the intended scope of the previously approved conditional use authorization. (1) For purposes of this Section, “within the intended scope” means that: (A) The project would continue to meet the criteria and limitations set forth in subsection (e) of this Section 304.8; (B1 The proposed modifications to the project would not necessitate a change to any condition imposed in the previously granted conditional use authorization; (C) The proposed modifications would not increase the building envelope of the project by more than 10 percent; and (D) The project would remain in compliance with the Development Agreement applicable to the project and approved by the Board of Supervisors in the ordinance contained in Board File No. 250698. (2) Proposed modifications that, in the reasonable determination of the Planning Director, do not meet all of the criteria set forth in subsections (f)(1)(A) through (f)(1)(D) above, shall be promptly scheduled for a public hearing before the Planning Commission for review and approval. (3) An owner may apply for modifications to the conditional use authorization pursuant to this subsection (f) as to the building or portion of the building such owner owns without the consent of any other owner of any portion of the project so long as the scope of the proposed modifications is limited to the building or portion of the building owned by the applicant. (Added by Ord. 197-25, File No. 250697, App. 10/27/2025, Eff. 11/27/2025, Oper. 11/27/25) CODIFICATION NOTE 1. So in Ord. 197-25. SEC. 305. VARIANCES. (See Interpretations related to this Section.) (a) General. The Zoning Administrator or the Zoning Administrator’s designee shall hear and make determinations regarding applications for variances from the strict application of quantitative standards in this Code. The Zoning Administrator or the Zoning Administrator’s designee shall have power to grant only such variances as may be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Code and in accordance with the general and specific rules contained herein, and to grant such variances only to the extent necessary to overcome such practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship as may be established in accordance with the provisions of this Section. No variance shall be granted in whole or in part which would have an effect substantially equivalent to a reclassification of property; or which would permit any use, any height or bulk of a building or structure, or any type or size or height of sign not expressly permitted by the provisions of this Code for the district or districts in which the property in question is located; or which would grant a privilege for which a conditional use procedure is provided by this Code; or which would change a definition in this Code; or which would waive, reduce or adjust the inclusionary housing requirements of Sections 415 through 415.9; or which would reduce or waive any portion of the usable open space applicable under certain circumstances in the Eastern Neighborhoods Mixed Use Districts pursuant to Section 135(i) and 135.3(d); or which would waive or reduce the quantity of bicycle parking required by Sections 155.2 through 155.3 where off-street automobile parking is proposed or existing; or which would waive, reduce or adjust the requirements of the TDM Program in Section 169 et seq1 et seq. A variance may be granted for the bicycle parking layout requirements in Section 155.1 of this Code. If the relevant Code provisions are later changed so as to be more restrictive before a variance authorization is acted upon, the more restrictive new provisions, from which no variance was granted, shall apply. The procedures for variances shall be as specified in this Section and in Sections 306 through 306.5. (b) Initiation. A variance action may be initiated by application of the owner, or authorized agent for the owner, of the property for which the variance is sought. (c) Determination. The Zoning Administrator shall hold a hearing on the application, provided, however, that if the variance requested involves a deviation of less than 10% from the Code requirement, the Zoning Administrator may at the Zoning Administrator’s option either hold or not hold such a hearing. No variance shall be granted in whole or in part unless there exist, and the Zoning Administrator specifies in his or her findings as part of a written decision, facts sufficient to establish: (1) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applying to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other property or uses in the same class of district; (2) That owing to such exceptional or extraordinary circumstances the literal enforcement of specified provisions of this Code would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship not created by or attributable to the applicant or the owner of the property; (3) That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the subject property, possessed by other property in the same class of district; (4) That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or materially injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity; and (5) That the granting of such variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Code and will not adversely affect the General Plan. Upon issuing the written decision either granting or denying the variance in whole or in part, the Zoning Administrator shall forthwith transmit a copy thereof to the applicant. The action of the Zoning Administrator shall be final and shall become effective 10 days after the date of the written decision except upon the filing of a valid appeal to the Board of Appeals as provided in Section 308.2 of this Code. (d) Conditions. When considering an application for a variance as provided herein with respect to applications for development of "dwellings" as defined in Chapter 87 of the San Francisco Administrative Code, the Zoning Administrator, or the Board of Appeals on appeal, shall comply with that Chapter which requires, among other things, that the Zoning Administrator and the Board of Appeals not base any decision regarding the development of "dwellings" in which "protected class" members are likely to reside on information which may be discriminatory to any member of a "protected class" (as all such terms are defined in Chapter 87 of the San Francisco Administrative Code). In addition, in granting any variance as provided herein, the Zoning Administrator, or the Board of Appeals on appeal, shall specify the character and extent thereof, and shall also prescribe such conditions as are necessary to secure the objectives of this Code. Once any portion of the granted variance is utilized, all such specifications and conditions pertaining to such authorization shall become immediately