o0208-17

FILE NO. 170834 AMENDED IN BOARD 10/17/2017 ORDINANCE NO. 208-17 [Planning Code - lnclusionary Affordable Housing Fee and Dv.'elling Unit Mix Requirements] Ordinance amending the Planning Code to revise the amount of the lnclusionary Affordable Housing Fee and the On-Site and Off-Site Affordable Housing Alternatives and other lnclusionary Housing requirements; adding reporting requirements for density bonus projects to require minimum d•.-Jelling unit mix in most residential districts; to clarify lnclusionary Housing requirements in the Transbay C-3 Special Use District; affirming the Planning Department's determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of public necessity. convenience. and 1 O welfare under Planning Code, Section 302; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. NOTE: Unchanged Code text and uncodified text are in plain Arial font. Additions to Codes are in single-underline italics Times New Roman font. Deletions to Codes are in strikethrough italics Times NerF Roman font. Board amendment additions are in double-underlined Arial font. Board amendment deletions are in strikethrough Arial font. Asterisks (* * * *) indicate the omission of unchanged Code subsections or parts of tables. Be it ordained by the People of the City and County of San Francisco: Section 1. General Findings. (a) The Planning Department has determined that the actions contemplated in this ordinance comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.). Said determination is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in File No. 170834 and is incorporated herein by reference. The Board affirms this determination. Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 (b) On April 27, 2017, and on July 6. 2017. the Planning Commission, in Resolution No,§,. 19903 and 19956, adopted findings that the actions contemplated in this ordinance are consistent, on balance, with the City's General Plan and eight priority policies of Planning Code Section 101.1. The Board adopts these findings as its own. A copy of said Resolution,§, is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in File No. 170834, and ffi are incorporated herein by reference. (c) Pursuant to Planning Code Section 302, this Board finds that this Planning Code Amendment will serve the public necessity, convenience, and welfare for the reasons set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No,§,. 19903 and 19956, and the Board incorporates such 1 O reasons herein by reference. A copy of Planning Commission Resolution No,§,. 19903 and 19956 is on file with the Board of Supervisors in File No. 170834. Section 2. Findings About lnclusionary Affordable Housing Requirements. (a) The purpose of this ordinance is to adopt inclusionary or affordable housing obligations following voter approval of Proposition Cat the June 7, 2016 election to revise the City Charter's inclusionary affordable housing requirements, which won overwhelming support with 67 .9% of the vote, and to update the provisions of the Planning Code that became effective after the Charter Amendment passed, consistent with the process set forth in Section 415.10 of the Planning Code. and elaborated upon further outlined in Ordinance No. 76-16, which required that the City study how to set inclusionarv housing obligations in San Francisco at the maximum economically feasible amount in market rate housing development to create affordable housing. The inclusionarv affordable housing obligations set forth in this ordinance will supersede and replace any previous requirements. (b) The San Francisco residential real estate market is one of the most expensive in the United States. In February 2016, the California Association of Realtors reported that the Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page2 median priced home in San Francisco was $1,437,500. This price is 222% higher than the State of California median ($446,460), and 312% higher than the national average ($348,900). While the national homeownership rate is approximately 63.8%, only approximately 37% of San Franciscans own their own home. The majority of market-rate homes for sale in San Francisco are priced out of the reach of low;;; and moderate;;;-income households. In 2015, the average rent was $3,524, which is affordable to households earning over $126,864. (c) The Board of Supervisors adopted San Francisco's General Plan Housing Element in March 2015, and the California Housing and Community Development Department certified 1 O it on May 29, 2015. The Housing Element states that San Francisco's share of the regional housing need for years 2015 through 2022 includes 10,873 housing units for very-low;;; and low-income households and 5,460 units for moderate/middle-income households, and a total production of 28,870 net new units, with almost 60% to be affordable for very-low, low- and moderate/middle-income San Franciscans. (d) In November 2016, the City provided the updated Residential Affordable Housing Nexus Analysis that confirms and quantifies the impact of new market rate housing development on the demand for affordable housing for households earning up to 120% of area median income. The study demonstrates a need of 31.8% affordable housing for rental housing, and 37 .6% affordable housing for ownership housing, and a need of 24.1 % onsite affordable housing for r~ntal housing, and 27.3% onsite affordable housing for ownership housing for households with incomes up to 120% of Area Median Income. When quantitving affordable housing impacts on households making up to 150% of area median income. the study demonstrates a need of 34.9% affordable housing for rental housing. and a need of 41.3% affordable housing for ownership housing. Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page (e) In February 2017, the Office of the Controller presented a study of the economic feasibility of increased inclusionary housing requirements, entitled "lnclusionary Housing Working Group: Final Report." The Controller's Office, supported by a contracted consulting team of three firms and advised by a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) with representatives appointed by the Mayor and Board of SupervisorsController, developed several policy recommendations, including: (1) that the City should impose different inclusionary housing requirements on rental and for-sale (condominium) properties; (2) that the City oot1-1€1-can set the initial onsite requirements at a maximum feasible amount of 18% for rental projects and 20% for ownership projects; (3) that the City may adoptshould commit to a 1 O 15-year schedule of increases to the inclusionary housing rate, at a rate of 0.5% increase each year; and (4) that the City should revise the schedule of lnclusionary housing fees to provide a more equivalent cost for developers as the on-site requirements. The Controller's Office recommended updating the fee percentage to 23% and 28% to create an equivalency to the recommended 18% and 20% on-site requirements, with the City conducting the specific calculation of the fee itself. (f) The Controller's Report further acknowledged that if either the state density bonus or a local bonus program were widely implemented in San Francisco. the likely result would be higher residual land values in many locations. which would support a higher inclusionary requirement. application of the state provided density bonus could make a difference in the financial feasibility of housing development projects. (g) The City's lnclusionarv Affordable Housing Program is intended to help address the demonstrated need for affordable housing in the City through the application of the City's land use controls Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page4 (h) As rents and sales prices outpace what is affordable to the typical San Francisco family. the City. faces a continuing shortage of affordable housing for not only verv low- and low-income residents. but also for moderate, middle and upper-middle income families. (i) In order to maximize the benefit of state and federal funds supporting affordable housing construction, which are typically restricted to verv low- and low-income households. and to maximize the amount of affordable units constructed, the majority of the City's new affordable housing production is likely to continue to focus on households at or below 60% of area median income. (i) The Board of Supervisors recognizes that this lnclusionarv Housing Program is only 1 O one small part of the City's overall strategy for providing affordable housing to verv low-, low-, moderate-, and middle-income households. The City will continue to acquire, rehabilitate and produce units through the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development, provide rental subsidies, and provide homeownership assistance to continue to expand its reach to households in need of affordable housing. (k) The City will also continue to pursue innovative solutions to provide and stabilize affordable housing in San Francisco, including programs such as HOME-SF that incentivize projects that set aside 30% of on-site units as permanently affordable, and 40% of units as family-friendly multiple bedroom units. !!Lin an effort to support a mix of both ownership project and rental projects, the City is providing a direct financial contribution to project sponsors who agree to rent units for a period of 30 years. The direct financial contribution is in the form of a reduction in the applicable affordable housing requirement. Section 3. The Planning Code is hereby amended by revising Sections 415.3± a00 415.6, and 415.7, to read as follows: Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 5 SEC. 415.3. APPLICATION. * * * * (b) Any development project that has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application prior to January 12, 2016 shall comply with the Affordable Housing Fee requirements, the on-site affordable housing requirements or the off-site affordable housing requirements, and all other provisions of Section 415.1 et seq., as applicable, in effect on January 12, 2016. For development projects that have submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application on or after January 1, 2013, the requirements set forth in Planning Code Sections 415.5, 415.6, and 415. 7 shall apply to certain development projects consisting of 25 dwelling units or more during a limited period of time as follows. (1) If a development project is eligible and elects to provide on-site affordable housing, the development project shall provide the following amounts of on-site affordable housing. All other requirements of Planning Code Sections 415.1 et seq. shall apply. (A) Any development project that has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application prior to January 1, 2014 shall provide affordable units in the amount of 13% of the number of units constructed on-site. (B) Any development project that has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application prior to January 1, 2015 shall provide affordable units in the amount of 13.5% of the number of units constructed on-site. (C) Any development project that has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application on or prior to January 12, 2016 shall provide affordable units in the amount of 14.5% of the number of units constructed on-site. (D) Any development project that submits an Environmental Evaluation application after January 12, 2016, shall comply with the requirements set forth in Planning Code Sections 415.5, 415.6 and 415.7, as applicable. Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page6 (E) Notwithstanding the provisions set forth in subsections (b)(1)(A), (B) and (C) of this Section 415.3, if a development project is located in a UMU Zoning District or in the South of Market Youth and Family Zoning District, and is eligible and elects to provide on-site units pursuant to Section 415.5(g), such development project shall comply with the on- site requirements applicable within such Zoning Districts, as they existed on January 12, 2016, plus the following additional amounts of on-site affordable units: (i) if the development project has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application prior to January 1, 2014, the Project Sponsor shall provide additional affordable units in the amount of 1 % of the number of units constructed on-site; (ii) if the development project has submitted a complete 1 O Environmental Evaluation application prior to January 1, 2015, the Project Sponsor shall provide additional affordable units in the amount of 1.5% of the number of units constructed on-site; or (iii) if the development project has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application on or prior to January 12, 2016, the Project Sponsor shall provide additional affordable units in the amount of 2% of the number of units constructed on-site. (F) Any development project that has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application on or before January 12, 2016 and seeks to utilize a density bonus under State Law shall use its best efforts to provide on-site affordable units in the amount of 25% of the number of units constructed on-site and shall consult with the Planning Department about how to achieve this amount of inclusionary affordable housing. An applicant seeking a density bonus under the provisions of State Law shall provide reasonable documentation to establish eligibility for a requested density bonus, incentives or concessions, and waivers or reductions of development standards. (2) If a development project pays the Affordable Housing Fee or is eligible and elects to provide off-site affordable housing, the development project shall provide the following fee amount or amounts of off-site affordable housing during the limited periods of Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 7 time set forth below. All other requirements of Planning Code Sections 415.1 et seq. shall apply. (A) Any development project that has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application prior to January 1, 2014, shall pay a fee or provide off- site housing in an amount equivalent to 25% of the number of units constructed on-site. (B) Any development project that has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application prior to January 1, 2015, shall pay a fee or provide off- site housing in an amount equivalent to 27.5% of the number of units constructed on-site. (C) Any development project that has submitted a complete 1 O Environmental Evaluation application on or prior to January 12, 2016 shall pay a fee or provide off-site housing in an amount equivalent to 30% of the number of units constructed on-site. (D) Any development project that submits an Environmental Evaluation application after January 12, 2016 shall comply with the requirements set forth in Sections 415.5, 415.6, and 415.7, as applicable. (E) Notwithstanding the provisions set forth in subsections (b )(2)(A), (B) and (C) of this Section 415.3, for development projects proposing buildings over 120 feet in height, as measured under the requirements set forth in the Planning Code, except for buildings up to 130 feet in height located both within a special use district and within a height and bulk district that allows a maximum building height of 130 feet, such development projects shall pay a fee or provide off-site housing in an amount equivalent to 30% of the number of units constructed on-site. Any buildings up to 130 feet in height located both within a special use district and within a height and bulk district that allows a maximum building height of 130 feet shall comply with the provisions of subsections (b )(2)(A), (B) and (C) of this Section 415.3 during the limited periods of time set forth therein. Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 8 (F) Notwithstanding the provisions set forth in subsections (b)(2)(A), (B) and (C) of this sSection 415.3, if a development project is located in a UMU Zoning District or in the South of Market Youth and Family Zoning District, and pays the Affordable Housing or is eligible and elects to provide off-site affordable housing pursuant to Section 415.5(g), or elects to comply with a land dedication alternative, such development project shall comply with the fee, off-site or land dedication requirements applicable within such Zoning Districts, as they existed on January 12, 2016, plus the following additional amounts for the Affordable Housing Fee or for land dedication or off-site affordable units: (i) if the development project has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application prior to January 1, 2014, the 1 O Project Sponsor shall pay an additional fee, or provide additional land dedication or off-site affordable units, in an amount equivalent to 5% of the number of units constructed on-site; (ii) if the development project has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application prior to January 1, 2015, the Project Sponsor shall pay an additional fee, or provide additional land dedication or off-site affordable units, in an amount equivalent to 7.5% of the number of units constructed on-site; or (iii) if the development project has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application on or prior to January 12, 2016, the Project Sponsor shall pay an additional fee, or provide additional land dedication or off-site affordable units, in an amount equivalent to 10% of the number of units constructed on-site. Notwithstanding the . foregoing, a development project shall not pay a fee or provide off-site units in a total amount greater than the equivalent of 30% of the number of units constructed on-site. (G) Any development project consisting of 25 dwelling units or more that has submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation application on or prior to January 12, 2016, and is eligible and elects to provide off-site affordable housing, may provide off-site affordable housing by acquiring an existing building to fulfill all or part of the requirements set forth in this Section 415.3 and in Section 415.7 with an equivalent amount of units as Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page ·2 in this Section 415.3(b )(2), as reviewed and approved by the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development and consistent with the parameters of its Small Sites Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program, in conformance with the income limits for the Small Sites Program. * * * * (d) Notwithstanding the provisions set forth in Section 415.3(b), or the inclusionary affordable housing requirements contained in Sections 415.5, 415.6, and 415.7, such requirements shall not apply to any project. consisting of 25 dwelling units or more. that has not submitted a complete Environmental Evaluation Application on or before January 12, 2016, if the project is located within the Eastern Neighborhoods Mission Planning Area, the North of Market Residential Special Use District Subarea 1 or Subarea 2, or the SOMA Neighborhood Commercial Transit District, because inclusionary affordable housing levels for those areas will be addressed in forthcoming area plan processes or an equivalent community planning process. Until such planning processes are complete and new inclusionary housing requirements for projects in those areas are adopted, projects consisting of 25 dwelling units or more shall (1) pay a fee or provide off-site housing in an amount equivalent to 30% if the principal housing project is a Rental Housing Project. or 33% if the principal housing project consists of Owned Units, or (2) provide affordable units in the amount of 25% of the number Rental Units constructed on-site or 27% of the number of Owned Units constructed on-site. For Rental Units, 15% of the on-site affordable units shall be affordable to low-income households, 5% shall be affordable to moderate-income households and 5% shall be affordable to middle-income households.=For Owned Units, 15% of the on-site affordable units shall be affordable to low-income households, 6% shall be affordable to moderate- income households and 6% shall be affordable to middle-income households. * * * * Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 10 SEC. 415.6. ON-SITE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ALTERNATIVE. If a project sponsor is eligible and elects to provide on-site units pursuant to Section 415.5(g), the development project shall meet the following requirements: (a) Number of Units. The number of units constructed on-site shall be as follows: * * * * (8) Specific Geographic Areas. For any housing development that is located in an area with a specific affordable housing requirement set forth in a Special Use District or in any other section of the Code such as Section 419, the higher housing requirement shall apply. The Planning Department, in consultation with the Controller, shall undertake a study of areas greater than 5 acres in size. where an Area Plan, Special Use District, or other re- zoning is being considered for adoption, or has been adopted, after January 1, 2015, to determine whether a higher on-site inclusionary affordable housing requirement is feasible on sites that have received a 20% or greater increase in developable residential gross floor area or a 35% or greater increase in_residential density over prior zoning, and shall submit such information to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. * * * * SEC. 415.7. OFF-SITE AFFORDABLE HOUSING. * * * * (f) Individual affordable units constructed as part of a larger off-site project under this Section 415.7 shall not receive development subsidies from any Federal, State or local program established for the purpose of providing affordable housing, and shall not be counted to satisfy any affordable housing requirement for the off-site development. Other units in the same off-site project may receive such subsidies. In addition, subsidies may be used, only Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 11 with the express written permission by MOHCD, to deepen the affordability of an affordable unit beyond the level of affordability required by this Program. (g) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 415. 7 (f) above, a project may use California Debt Limit Allocation Committee (CDLAC) tax-exempt bond financing and 4% credits under the Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) to help fund its obligations under this ordinance as long as the project provides affordable units as required by CDL/\C and TC/\C. 2-a% at least 60% of the off-site affordable units as affordable to households at W% 55% of area median income for off site housing, and the balance of the off-site affordable units using these funds at affordability rates that comply with the requirements of TCAC, 1 O CDLAC, and this Section 415. The income table to be used for such projects when the units are priced at W% 55% of area median income is the income table used by MOHCD for the lnclusionarv Housing Program, not that used by TCAC or CDLAC. Except as provided in this subsection !91. all units provided under this Section 415. 7 must meet all of the requirements this ordinance and the Procedures Manual for off-site housing. Section 4. The Planning Code is hereby amended by revising Section 249.28, to read as follows: SEC. 249.28. TRANSBAY C-3 SPECIAL USE DISTRICT. (a) Purpose. There shall be a Transbay C-3 Special Use District, which is wholly within the Transbay Redevelopment Project Area, comprising all of the parcels, primarily privately-owned and zoned C-3, within the Redevelopment Area but outside of the Transbay Downtown Residential District (TB-DTR), and whose boundaries are designated on Sectional Map No. ISU of the Zoning Map of the City and County of San Francisco. This district is generally bounded by Mission, Second, Clementina, and Beale Streets and whose primary features include the Transbay Terminal facility and its associated ramps, and a portion of the Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 12 New Montgomery/Second Street Conservation District. A vision and guidelines for this area as an integral component of the Transbay Redevelopment Area are laid out in the Transbay Redevelopment Plan and its companion documents, including the Design for the Development and the Development Controls and Design Guidelines for the Transbay Redevelopment Project. California Public Resources Code Section 5027.1 requires that 35% of all dwelling units developed during the life of the Transbay Redevelopment Plan in the Transbay Redevelopment Project Area shall be permanently affordable to low- and moderate- income households. as such households are defined in State law. Section 4.9.3 of the Transbay Redevelopment Plan requires that a minimum of 15% of all units constructed on a 1 O particular site shall be affordable to certain qualitving households. as set forth in such Plan. (b) Controls. * * * * (6) Housing Requirements for Residential and Live/Work Development Projects. The requirements of Section 415. 1 et seq. shall apply" subject to the following exceptions: (A) A minimum of 15% of all units The inclusionarv affordable housing provided on-site shall be the higher amount determined under Section 4.9.3 of the Transbay Redevelopment Plan or Section 415.6(a) of the Planning Code. as it may be amended from time to time: and the inclusionarv affordable housing constructed on the site shall be affordable to, and occupied by, :qualifying persons and families~ as defined by Section 4.9.3 of the Transbay Redevelopment Plan; (B) All required inclusionary affordable housing units in the Transbay C-3 SUD required by this Section shall be built on-site; and (C) Off site construction or in lieu fee payment Payment of the Affordable Housing Fee or compliance with the Off-Site Affordable Housing Alternative are shall not be permitted to satisfy tfH&-the inclusionarv affordable housing requirement. Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 13 Section e§. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after enactment. Enactment occurs when the Mayor signs the ordinance, the Mayor returns the ordinance unsigned or does not sign the ordinance within ten days of receiving it, or the Board of Supervisors overrides the Mayor's veto of the ordinance. Section +§. Scope of Ordinance. In enacting this ordinance, the Board of Supervisors intends to amend only those words, phrases, paragraphs, subsections, sections, articles, numbers, punctuation marks, charts, diagrams, or any other constituent parts of the Municipal 1 O Code that are explicitly shown in this ordinance as additions, deletions, Board amendment additions, and Board amendment deletions in accordance with the "Note" that appears under the official title of the ordinance. By: n:\legana\as2017\1700109\01227419.docx Supervisors Breed; Kim, Peskin, Safai, Tang BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 14 City and County of San Francisco Tails Ordinance - CityHall I Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102-4689 File Number: 170834 Date Passed: October 24, 2017 Ordinance amending the Planning Code to revise the amount of the lnclusionary Affordable Housing Fee and the On-Site and Off-Site Affordable Housing Alternatives and other lnclusionary Housing requirements; to clarify lnclusionary Housing requirements in the Transbay C-3 Special Use District; affirming the Planning Department's determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 1O1. 1. July 18, 2017 Board of Supervisors - AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE . Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang and Yee July 18, 2017 Board of Supervisors -AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE Ayes: 11 • Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang and Yee July 18, 2017 Board of Supervisors - PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang and Yee· July 25, 2017 Board of Supervisors -AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang and Yee July 25, 2017 Board of Supervisors - PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang and Yee September 05, 2017 Board of Supervisors - CONTINUED ON FINAL PASSAGE Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang and Yee September 12, 2017 Board of Supervisors -AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang and Yee September 12, 2017 Board of Supervisors - PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang ar.id Yee City and County of San Frm1cisco Pages Printed at 2:07 pm on 10125/17 September 19, 2017 Board of Supervisors - CONTINUED ON FINAL PASSAGE Ayes: 7 - Breed, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Sheehy and Yee Excused: 4 - Cohen, Farrell, Safai and Tang September 26, 2017 Board of Supervisors -AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang and Yee September 26, 2017 Board of Supervisors - PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang and Yee October 03, 2017 Board of Supervisors -AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang and Yee October 03, 2017 Board of Supervisors - PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang and Yee October 17, 2017 Board of Supervisors -AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang and Yee October 17, 2017 Board of Supervisors - PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang and Yee October 24, 2017 Board of Supervisors - FINALLY PASSED City and County of San Francisco Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang and Yee Page6 Printed at 2:07 pm on I 0/25117 File No. 170834 City a11d County of Sa11 Francisco Page 7 I hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was FINALLY PASSED on 10/24/2017 by the Board of Supervisors of the City arid County of San Francisco. Angela Calvillo Clerk of the Board Date Approved Printed at 2:07 pm 011 I 0/25117