§ 9.4.15 - Review of disciplinary actions.
Except for the dismissal of a probationary member, any discipline other than a reprimand received by a member of the Classified Service shall be subject to review by a Hearing Officer and then the Commission pursuant to this Section of the Charter and Commission rules.
(A) Within ten (10) days from the date of completion of service of the departmental order of disciplinary action, the member of the Classified Service against whom the order has been issued may file with the Civil Service Commission a written appeal requesting review of the discipline. Such appeal shall be filed in a manner as specified by Commission rule. In the written appeal the member may request an expedited hearing. Upon such request for an expedited hearing, a hearing shall be held within thirty (30) days of the date of selection of the Hearing Officer unless a later date is agreed to by the parties or ordered for good cause shown by the Hearing Officer.
(B) Pursuant to Commission rules, upon receipt of an appeal challenging a disciplinary action, the Commission shall randomly select a Hearing Officer to hear the appeal.
(C) At a disciplinary hearing the member in person or by counsel, may offer evidence in support of his or her written objections. The Manager of Safety, acting through the City Attorney as counsel, shall offer evidence in justification of the departmental action. The hearing shall be recorded by a reporter or by an electronic recording device and a full record made. The Commission may adopt rules regarding pre-hearing matters and the conduct of the hearing.
(D) In reviewing the disciplinary action, the Hearing Officer shall give due weight to the necessity of the maintaining by the Manager of administrative control of the department. The Hearing Officer shall review the full record before him or her and shall make written findings, affirming, reversing, or modifying the disciplinary action in whole or in part. The Hearing Officer's decision shall be filed with the Commission. Promptly upon receipt of the decision, the Commission shall simultaneously serve it on the Manager of Safety and the member involved by mailing it by certified or registered mail. Service shall be complete upon return of the mailing receipt, whether accepted or not.
(E) The decision of the Hearing Officer may be appealed to either the Commission, or directly to District Court in accordance with the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure then in effect. If one party appeals to the Commission and the other party appeals to the District Court, the court shall dismiss the appeal without prejudice until the Commission rules on the appeal before it. Any appeal to the Commission shall be initiated by filing a notice of appeal with the Commission as provided by Commission rule. Upon receipt of the notice of appeal, the Commission shall promptly notify the non-appealing party. The rules of the Commission shall provide for procedural matters regarding disciplinary appeals before the Commission.
(F) In deciding the appeal, the Commission shall rely only upon the evidence presented to the Hearing Officer except when the appeal is based on new and material evidence. All factual findings by the Hearing Officer shall be binding on the Commission, and the Commission may not resolve disputed issues of fact. Review of a Hearing Officer decision by the Commission shall be limited to the following grounds: (a) new and material evidence is available that was not available when the appeal was heard by the Hearing Officer, (b) the decision of the Hearing Officer involves an erroneous interpretation of departmental or civil service rules, (c) the decision of the Hearing Officer involves policy considerations that may have effect beyond the case at hand, or (d) the discipline affirmed or imposed by the Hearing Officer is inconsistent with discipline received by other members of the department under similar circumstances. The Commission may affirm, reverse or modify the Hearing Officer's decision provided that the Commission shall not have the authority to impose a level of discipline more severe than that imposed by the Hearing Officer or the Manager of Safety.
(G) Either the member of the Classified Service affected thereby or the Manager of Safety may seek a judicial review of the decision of the Civil Service Commission in accordance with the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure then in effect. Judicial review proceedings hereunder shall not be extended further than to determine if the Commission has exceeded its jurisdiction or abused its discretion under the provisions of this Charter. In the event that no appeal of the Hearing Officer's decision is made to the Commission, either the member of the Classified Service affected thereby or the Manager of Safety may seek judicial review of the Hearing Officer's decision in the same manner as provided for review of a Commission decision. Under the circumstances, the time period for filing for judicial review shall begin the day after the last day when an appeal with the Commission could have been filed.
(Charter 1960, C5.73-2; amended June 5, 1962; amended November 4, 1986; amended November 7, 2000. Subsections (E), (F) and (G) added November 4, 1986; Ord. No. 428-02, § 1, 6-3-02, elec. 8-13-02; Ord. No. 138-03, § 1, 2-24-03, elec. 5-6-03)