Dallas City Code § 12A-55 GENERAL.
SEC. 12A-55. GENERAL.
The remedies contained in this article are available whenever the ethics advisory commission finds a violation or violations of this chapter. (Ord. Nos. 24316; 32072; 32472)
ENFORCEMENT, CULPABLE MENTAL STATE, AND PENALTIES.
Dallas City Code ch. 12A, art. X
in effectDallas City Code § 12A-56 VIOLATIONS; PENALTY.
SEC. 12A-56. VIOLATIONS; PENALTY.
A person who violates any of the laws, ordinances, and rules listed in Section 12A-50(a)(2), or who fails to perform an act required of the person by any of the laws, ordinances, and rules listed in Section 12A-50(a)(2), commits a violation of this chapter. (Ord. Nos. 30391; 32072; 32472)
Dallas City Code § 12A-57 CULPABLE MENTAL STATE.
SEC. 12A-57. CULPABLE MENTAL STATE.
To commit a violation under any provision of this chapter, a person must have acted or failed to act knowingly or with knowledge. (Ord. Nos. 24316; 32072; 32472)
Dallas City Code § 12A-58 DISCIPLINARY ACTION.
SEC. 12A-58. DISCIPLINARY ACTION.
(a) An employee who fails to comply with this chapter or who violates this chapter may be disciplined in accordance with city personnel rules and procedures.
(b) If a city council member fails to comply with this chapter or violates this chapter, the sanction must be decided by the city council in accordance with the city charter.
(c) If a member of a board or commission fails to comply with this chapter or violates this chapter, the sanction must be decided by the city council in accordance with the city charter.
(d) If the civil service director, the park and recreation director, or the employees' retirement fund administrator fails to comply with this chapter or violates this chapter, they may be disciplined in accordance with the personnel rules and the sanction must be decided by their respective boards.
(e) If the city manager, city attorney, city auditor, city secretary, or a municipal judge fails to comply with this chapter or violates this chapter, they may be disciplined in accordance with the personnel rules and the sanction must be decided by the city council.
(f) If a former city official or former city employee fails to comply with this chapter or violates this chapter, the sanction must be decided by the city council.
(g) If a person who is not a current or former city official or a current or former city employee fails to comply with this chapter or violates this chapter, the sanction must be decided by city council.
(h) Settlement agreements approved by the ethics advisory commission must include the final sanction, if any. (Ord. Nos. 24316; 30391; 32072; 32472)
Dallas City Code § 12A-59 SANCTIONS.
SEC. 12A-59. SANCTIONS.
(a) In determining sanctions based on a recommendation of the ethics advisory commission, the person or entity imposing the sanction shall take into consideration the recommendation of the ethics advisory commission and the following factors:
(1) The culpability of the person charged.
(2) The harm to public or private interests resulting from the violation.
(3) The necessity of preserving public trust in the city.
(4) Whether there is evidence of a pattern of disregard for ethical standards.
(5) Whether remedial action has been taken that will mitigate the adverse effects of the violation.
(b) For current city employees, the sanctioning person shall take appropriate action in accordance with the personnel rules, and may impose any of the following additional sanctions:
(1) Referral to ethics training. The sanctioning person may require a city employee to attend ethics training. When recommending a referral to ethics training, the ethics advisory commission shall include in the recommendation the manner and quantity of training based on the type and severity of the violation.
(2) Referral for damages or injunction. The sanctioning person may refer the violation to the city attorney for an action to recover damages to the city or to enjoin prohibited actions.
(3) Referral for criminal prosecution. The sanctioning person may refer the violation to the Dallas Police Department, if the sanctioning person finds that the violation warrants criminal prosecution.
(c) For the civil service director, the park and recreation director, or the employees' retirement fund administrator, the sanctioning entity shall take appropriate action in accordance with the personnel rules, and may impose any of the following additional sanctions:
(1) Referral to ethics training. The sanctioning entity may require the person to attend ethics training. When recommending a referral to ethics training, the ethics advisory commission shall include in the recommendation the manner and quantity of training based on the type and severity of the violation.
(2) Referral for damages or injunction. The sanctioning entity may refer the violation to the city attorney for an action to recover damages to the city or to enjoin prohibited actions.
(3) Referral for criminal prosecution. The sanctioning entity may refer the violation to the Dallas Police Department, if the sanctioning entity finds that the violation warrants criminal prosecution.
(d) For the city manager, city attorney, city auditor, city secretary, or a municipal judge, the city council shall take appropriate action in accordance with the personnel rules, and may impose any of the following additional sanctions:
(1) Referral to ethics training. The city council may require the person to attend ethics training. When recommending a referral to ethics training, the ethics advisory commission shall include in the recommendation the manner and quantity of training based on the type and severity of the violation.
(2) Referral for damages or injunction. The city council may refer the violation to the city attorney for an action to recover damages to the city or to enjoin prohibited actions.
(3) Referral for criminal prosecution. The city council may refer the violation to the Dallas Police Department, if the city council finds that the violation warrants criminal prosecution.
(e) For a city council member, a board or commission member, a former city official, or a former city employee, the city council may impose any of the following sanctions:
(1) Letter of notification. The city council may issue a letter of notification if the city council finds that a violation of this chapter was clearly unintentional. A letter of notification must advise the person of any steps to be taken to avoid future violations.
(2) Letter of admonition. The city council may issue a letter of admonition if the city council finds that the violation of this chapter was minor, but where the circumstances call for a more substantial response than a letter of notification.
(3) Referral to ethics training. The city council may require a current city official to attend ethics training. When recommending a referral to ethics training, the ethics advisory commission shall include in the recommendation the manner and quantity of training based on the type and severity of the violation.
(4) Reprimand. The city council may issue a reprimand if the city council finds that a violation of this chapter was not minor and was committed intentionally or through reckless disregard of this chapter.
(5) Resolution of censure. The city council may adopt a resolution of censure if the city council finds that a serious or repeated violation of this chapter has been committed intentionally or through reckless disregard of this chapter and the violation substantially threatens the public trust.
(6) Voiding of prior actions. The city council may, to the extent allowed by law, void any prior city council or city board or commission action that approved any decision, agreement, award, or contract if the action was taken as a result of a violation of this chapter and the interests of the city require voiding of the prior action.
(7) Suspension from office. The city council may suspend a current city official other than a city council member from office for a period determined by the city council if the city council finds that a serious or repeated violation of this chapter was committed intentionally or through culpable disregard of this chapter. Any proceedings for suspension of a current city official shall be in compliance with the city charter and state law.
(8) Removal from office. The city council may remove a current city official, including a city council member, from office if the city council finds that a serious or repeated violation of this chapter was committed intentionally or through culpable disregard of this chapter and future violations are likely to occur. Any proceedings for removal of a current city official from office shall be in compliance with the city charter and state law.
(9) Referral for damages or injunction. The city council may refer the violation to the city attorney for an action to recover damages to the city or to enjoin prohibited actions.
(10) Referral for criminal prosecution. The city council may refer the violation to the Dallas Police Department, if the city council finds that the violation warrants criminal prosecution.
(f) For a person who is not a current or former city official or a current or former city employee (e.g., lobbyists, people doing business with the city, resident), the city council may impose any of the following sanctions:
(1) Letter of notification. The city council may issue a letter of notification if the city council finds that a violation of this chapter was clearly unintentional. A letter of notification must advise the person of any steps to be taken to avoid future violations.
(2) Letter of admonition. The city council may issue a letter of admonition if the city council finds that the violation of this chapter was minor, but where the circumstances call for a more substantial response than a letter of notification.
(3) Reprimand. The city council may issue a reprimand if the city council finds that a violation of this chapter was not minor and was committed intentionally or through reckless disregard of this chapter.
(4) Resolution of censure. The city council may adopt a resolution of censure if the city council finds that a serious or repeated violation of this chapter has been committed intentionally or through reckless disregard of this chapter and the violation substantially threatens the public trust.
(5) Disqualification from contracting or lobbying. The city council may, to the extent allowed by law, prohibit the person from entering into contracts with the city or from lobbying before the city on behalf of clients. The scope and duration of the disqualification shall be determined by the city council.
(6) Voiding of prior actions. The city council may, to the extent allowed by law, void any prior city council or city board or commission action that approved any decision, agreement, award, or contract if the action was taken as a result of a violation of this chapter and the interests of the city require voiding of the prior action.
(7) Referral for damages or injunction. The city council may refer the violation to the city attorney for an action to recover damages to the city or to enjoin prohibited actions.
(8) Referral for criminal prosecution. The city council may refer the violation to the Dallas Police Department, if the city council finds that the violation warrants criminal prosecution. (Ord. Nos. 30391; 32072; 32472)
Dallas City Code § 12A-60 PROSECUTION FOR PERJURY.
SEC. 12A-60. PROSECUTION FOR PERJURY.
Any person who knowingly files or makes a false sworn statement under this chapter is subject to criminal prosecution for perjury under the laws of the State of Texas. (Ord. Nos. 24316; 29660; 32072; 32472)
Dallas City Code § 12A-61 INTERFERENCE WITH AN INVESTIGATION.
SEC. 12A-61. INTERFERENCE WITH AN INVESTIGATION.
A person commits an offense if the person interferes with any investigation of an alleged violation of this chapter in any manner, including seeking to persuade or coerce others to withhold their cooperation. (Ord. Nos. 30391; 32072; 32472)
Dallas City Code § 12A-62 DISQUALIFICATION FROM CONTRACTING.
SEC. 12A-62. DISQUALIFICATION FROM CONTRACTING.
(a) Any person who has been found by the ethics advisory commission to have knowingly violated any provision of this chapter may be prohibited by the city council from entering into any contract with the city for a period of two years.
(b) It is a violation of this chapter:
(1) for a person debarred from entering into a contract with the city to enter or attempt to enter into a contract with the city during the period of disqualification from contracting; or
(2) for a city official or employee to knowingly assist in a violation of Subsection (b)(1).
(c) Nothing in this section prohibits any person from receiving a city service or benefit, or from using a city facility, according to the same terms generally available to the public.
(d) A business entity may be disqualified from contracting with the city based on the conduct of the entity's employee or agent if the conduct occurred within the scope of employment or agency with the entity. (Ord. Nos. 24316; 32072; 32472)
Dallas City Code § 12A-63 VEXATIOUS COMPLAINANTS.
SEC. 12A-63. VEXATIOUS COMPLAINANTS.
(a) Definition. A vexatious complainant is someone who persistently files ethics complaints without having sufficient grounds for doing so. Vexatious complainants file complaints that:
(1) abuse the investigative process of the inspector general;
(2) harass, annoy, cause delay or detriment to a person subject to a complaint;
(3) are repeatedly baseless and without merit; or
(4) are filed for a political or other wrongful purpose.
(b) Report and recommendation of the inspector general. If the inspector general credibly suspects a person of being a vexatious complainant, the inspector general shall submit a report to the ethics advisory commission chair detailing the facts supporting the inspector general's position and requesting a hearing on the matter.
(c) Stay of complaints. Once the inspector general has submitted a vexatious complainant report to the ethics advisory commission, the inspector general shall not accept or process another complaint from the complainant until the commission has determined whether the complainant is a vexatious complainant.
(d) Notification. The inspector general shall promptly forward a copy of the report to the complainant with instructions detailing the response and hearing procedures.
(e) Response. The complainant shall have the opportunity to submit a sworn response, together with such other information the complainant believes is relevant. The response must be submitted to the inspector general within 10 days after the date that the complainant was sent the inspector general's report. Copies of all information provided to the inspector general by the complainant must be distributed to the ethics advisory commission within 10 days after the inspector general receives the information.
(f) Format of evidence. If a complainant submits evidence in an electronic, mechanical, or other format that the inspector general cannot duplicate or display, the inspector general shall request the complainant provide the evidence in a format that the inspector general can duplicate or display. If the complainant fails to provide the evidence to the city inspector general in a format that the inspector general can duplicate or display within seven days after the inspector general has made a request, then the evidence may not be presented to or considered by the ethics advisory commission when making its determination.
(g) Evidentiary hearing. The ethics advisory commission shall hold a hearing to determine whether the complainant is a vexatious complainant. Not less than 10 days before the hearing, the inspector general shall, by certified mail or personal service, give written notice to the complainant of the date, time, and place of the hearing. If the complainant consents in writing, the inspector general may give written notice by facsimile, email, or first class U.S. mail.
(h) Ex parte communications. It is a violation of this section for:
(1) the complainant, the inspector general, or any person acting on their behalf to engage or attempt to engage, directly or indirectly, in any ex parte communication about the subject matter of an evidentiary hearing under this section with any member of the ethics advisory commission; or
(2) a member of the ethics advisory commission to:
(A) knowingly entertain an ex parte communication prohibited by Subsection (h)(1); or
(B) knowingly communicate, directly or indirectly, with any person, other than a member of the commission, its staff, or its legal counsel, about any issue of fact or law relating to an evidentiary hearing under this section.
(i) Hearing procedures. Unless otherwise provided in this section, the procedures for hearings in Section 12A-53 apply to hearings conducted in accordance with this section.
(j) Rights of the complainant. The complainant has the right to attend the hearing, the right to make a statement, the right to present and cross-examine witnesses, and the right to be represented by legal counsel or another advisor.
(k) Standard of review. In determining whether a complainant is a vexatious complainant, the ethics advisory commission may consider the inspector general's report and additional evidence of:
(1) the timing of the complaints with respect to when the facts supporting the alleged violations became known or should have become known to the complainant;
(2) the nature and type of any publicity surrounding the filing of the complaints;
(3) the existence and nature of any relationship between the persons charged in the complaints and the complainant before the complaints were filed;
(4) whether the complainant knew or reasonably should have known that the allegations in the complaints were groundless or without merit; and
(5) the complainant's motives in filing the complaints, including whether or not the complaints were meant:
(A) to abuse the investigative process of the inspector general;
(B) to harass, annoy, cause delay or detriment to a person subject to a complaint; or
(C) for a political or other wrongful purpose.
(l) Determination. A determination that a complainant is a vexatious complainant may be made only upon an affirmative vote of three-fifths of all commission members present and voting. Otherwise, the complainant is not deemed a vexatious complainant. A finding that a complainant is vexatious must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence. The commission's determination that a complainant is not a vexatious complainant does not affect the prior decision of the inspector general to dismiss the complainant's prior complaints.
(m) Sanction for being deemed a vexatious complainant.
(1) If a complainant is determined to be a vexatious complainant, the ethics advisory commission may prohibit the complainant from filing another complaint alleging one or more violations of this chapter for up to:
(A) two years after the date of the commission's determination that the complainant is a vexatious complainant, if the commission had not determined within the preceding five years that the complainant was a vexatious complainant; or
(B) four years after the date of the commission's determination that the complainant is a vexatious complainant, if the commission had determined within the preceding five years that the complainant was a vexatious complainant.
(2) When determining whether and for how long to prohibit a complainant who has been deemed a vexatious complainant from filing another complaint under this chapter, the ethics advisory commission shall consider the following factors:
(A) The seriousness of the potential consequences to the persons charged in the groundless complaints and the extent and gravity of the abuse, harassment, and delay resulting from the filing of groundless complaints.
(B) The sanction necessary to deter future violations, including number of groundless complaints filed and whether there are any mitigating circumstances.
(C) Any other matters that justice may require.
(3) If the ethics advisory commission prohibits the complainant from filing another complaint for a specific amount of time under Subsection (m)(1), the inspector general shall not accept or process another complaint alleging one or more violations of this chapter from the complainant during the time that the complainant is prohibited from filing a complaint.
(4) The inspector general may notify the appropriate regulatory or supervisory agency of the findings and determination of the ethics advisory commission, including referring its findings and determination to a criminal investigation agency or prosecution entity for investigation of a violation of a state or federal law.
(n) Written decision. If the ethics advisory commission determines that a complainant is a vexatious complainant and imposes a sanction, it shall make all reasonable efforts to issue a written decision within 15 days after the hearing. The commission shall state its findings in the written decision.
(o) Notification. Within 10 days after issuing a written decision, the ethics advisory commission shall forward copies of the findings and decision to the complainant, the city attorney, the city secretary, the city council, and any member of the commission who did not participate in the disposition of the matter. The city secretary shall make copies of the findings and decision available to the public as authorized by law. (Ord. Nos. 29660; 32072; 32472)
Source: City of Dallas, Dallas City Code and City Charter (American Legal Publishing, codelibrary.amlegal.com)URL: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/dallas/latest/dallas_tx/0-0-0-139308Fetched: 10/26/2026