Sec. 6-586. - Remedial action plan and review.
(a) At the first quarterly review, the owner and police official shall review the disorder activity in or on the property since the date of the remedial action plan and determine the disorder activity count for the property during that time period. If the disorder activity count is no longer at or above the disorder risk threshold, then the designation of INRA will be removed and no further review requirements or registration shall be required. Nothing in this section prohibits the owner and police official from voluntarily continuing the implementation of an agreed plan of action. If the disorder activity count continues to fall at or above the disorder risk threshold, then the owner and the police official may amend the remedial action plan and a second quarterly month review date will be set.
(b) At the second quarterly month review, the owner and police official shall review the disorder activity in or on the property since the date of the amended remedial action plan and determine the disorder activity count for the property during that time period. If the disorder activity count is no longer at or above the disorder risk threshold, then the designation of INRA will be removed and no further review requirements or registration shall be required. Nothing in this section prohibits the owner and police official from voluntarily continuing the implementation of an agreed plan of action. If the disorder activity count continues to fall at or above the disorder risk threshold, then the police official and the owner shall amend and sign the remedial action plan and a third quarterly month review date will be set.
(c) At the third quarterly month review, the owner and police official shall review the disorder activity in or on the property since the date of the amended remedial action plan and determine the disorder activity count for the property during that time period. If the disorder activity count is no longer at or above the disorder risk threshold, the designation of INRA will be removed and no further review requirements or registration shall be required. Nothing in this section prohibits the owner and police official from voluntarily continuing the implementation of an agreed plan of action. If the disorder activity count continues to fall at or above the disorder risk threshold, then the police official shall determine whether the owner has complied in good faith with the remedial action plans.
(1) In determining whether the owner has acted in good faith, the police official shall weigh the following factors:
a. Whether the owner has regularly met with the police official;
b. Whether the owner has exhausted all resources reasonably available to the owner in order to comply with the terms of the remedial action plans;
c. Whether the owner has intentionally ignored a term of a remedial action plan; and
d. Whether the disorder activity on the property constitutes a public nuisance.
(2) If there is clear and convincing evidence that the owner has been found to have acted in good faith, then the police official may remove the designation of INRA and continue to work with the owner. A property that continues to fall at or above the disorder risk threshold will be referred to the city attorney's office for a determination as to whether a public nuisance action or any other legal or equitable remedy is warranted.
(d) All remedial action plans will be based on the procedures and practices set forth in the CMPD Remedial Action Plan Manual; A Guide to Managing Rental Properties to Prevent Crime.
(Ord. No. 4890, § 1, 5-29-2012; Ord. No. 9536, § 1, 3-25-2019)