Sec. 279-237. - Discipline; merit board procedures and appeals.
(a) The civilian police merit board of the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department shall establish disciplinary policies for use in all disciplinary matters of the department. The merit board, in conjunction with the chief, subject to approval of the mayor, shall establish the rules and regulations for the department. All disciplinary charges shall be based on these rules and regulations.
(b) Disciplinary actions within the department shall be in one (1) of the following forms:
(1) Written reprimand;
(2) Suspension without pay;
(3) Demotion; or
(4) Discharge.
(c) An officer may be placed on leave with pay for up to thirty (30) calendar days by the chief pending determination of final disciplinary action. Such leave with pay shall be considered a duty status and not a punishment.
(d) The chief shall have the ultimate authority to discipline any member of the department, subject only to the restrictions outlined below. In making his determination, the chief may refer the matter to a disciplinary board of captains for recommendation. Following his determination in a disciplinary matter, the chief may:
(1) Issue a written reprimand.
(2) Suspend an officer without pay for up to six (6) calendar months. If the suspension is for more than ten (10) working days, the officer may appeal that portion of the suspension greater than ten (10) days to the merit board. Such appeal must be made within thirty (30) calendar days of notice of the action.
(3) Demote the officer in rank by one (1) merit rank. Any demotion may be appealed to the merit board within thirty (30) calendar days of notice of action.
(4) Recommend discharge of the officer to the merit board. Upon referral of the matter to the merit board, the merit board shall conduct a de novo administrative hearing of record as provided in subsection (k) of this section. Pending determination by the merit board, the officer shall be placed on suspension without pay.
(5) Reinstate with pay any officer who previously was suspended without pay. Provided, however, that the chief shall consult with the mayor regarding any discipline exceeding a ten-day suspension.
(e) Departmental superiors shall have the authority to discipline subordinate officers as outlined below. However, these superiors may recommend any of the above disciplinary actions to the chief through the chain of command.
(1) The assistant chief, deputy chiefs and majors may issue a written reprimand or suspend an officer for not more than ten (10) working days without pay. The chief may delegate additional disciplinary authority to the assistant and deputy chiefs.
(2) Captains may issue a written reprimand or suspend an officer for not more than three (3) working days without pay.
(3) Lieutenants may issue a written reprimand or suspend an officer for not more than two (2) working days without pay.
(4) Sergeants may issue a written reprimand or suspend an officer for one (1) working day without pay.
(f) Officers in non-merit appointed ranks who are classified by the department as exempt executive, administrative or professional employees pursuant to the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act are not subject to unpaid disciplinary suspensions other than for violations of safety rules of major significance unless the suspension is for the period of an entire workweek or a specified number of full workweeks.
(g) All disciplinary actions taken by anyone except the chief shall be forwarded in writing to the disciplinary board of captains through the chain of command within three (3) working days of the action. The disciplinary board of captains shall ensure due process and consistency of discipline throughout the department. This disciplinary board may conduct an administrative review of the matter, request further investigation by internal affairs or other appropriate personnel, or hold a hearing on the matter.
(h) If a hearing is held by the disciplinary board of captains, the officer charged shall be notified in writing of the charges, the time and date of the hearing, and the officer's right to receive in advance of the hearing a copy of any witness statement or other document that will be considered at the hearing. In such hearings, and pursuant to departmental policy, the officer shall have the right to have counsel present and to have witnesses subpoenaed by the board of captains to testify in his or her behalf upon advance notice to the board. All testimony before the captains' board shall be under oath, and any individual appearing before the board shall cooperate fully and answer all questions truthfully and directly. The hearing before the captains' board shall be conducted in accordance with the written directives of the chief and the merit board. After the hearing, the board of captains shall, upon majority vote, reduce to writing its findings of either guilty or not guilty.
(i) The disciplinary board of captains shall report the results of its review and/or hearing to the chief for determination. Included in this report shall be the disciplinary board's findings and recommendations. If the finding is "guilty," the disciplinary board shall also make its recommendations for punishment. The chief may concur with the captain's board in full or in part or may fully or partially reverse its recommendations.
(j) The disciplinary board of captains shall consist of three (3) officers holding the permanent merit rank of captain, who shall serve for a period of three (3) months. Each captain shall be selected at random. The names of the captains shall be drawn from a list of all eligible captains by the police officer ranking first on the most current sergeant's promotion list who shall serve for a period of three (3) months and who shall then be succeeded by the next highest ranking officer on such list who shall serve for a three-month period and so forth. If a vacancy occurs on the board of captains by reason of a board member becoming unable to perform his duties and serve on such board, the vacancy shall be filled in the same manner in which the board was selected.
(k) Disciplinary actions addressed by the merit board on appeal from the officer shall be handled through administrative hearing. This hearing shall be de novo and shall be a hearing of record. In making an appeal, the officer shall submit a written request for appeal to the merit board within thirty (30) calendar days of notice of disciplinary action. The merit board then shall schedule the hearing, providing the officer with at least fifteen (15) calendar days' notice prior to the hearing date; however, if there are criminal charges pending against the officer that arose from substantially the same conduct, circumstances, or subject matter that gave rise to the disciplinary action, then the merit board shall not conduct the hearing until after such criminal charges have been resolved at the trial level. The evidence before the merit board shall consist of the written charges and action taken on such charges, the findings of fact and recommendations from the chief and/or the disciplinary board of captains, and any other evidence requested by the merit board or presented by the charged officer.
(l) The officer requesting an appeal and the chief may be represented by legal counsel before the merit board.
(m) After hearing the evidence, the merit board shall, by majority vote, reduce its findings and decision to writing. The merit board may fully or partially affirm or reverse any portion of the chief's determination that is appealable. In addition, the merit board may remand the action for further review by the chief.
(n) If the officer is found not guilty by the merit board, any pay he or she may have lost due to suspension, or any rank lost due to demotion, shall be returned to the officer.
(o) Any officer who disagrees with the findings of the merit board shall have the right to file a verified petition to the Superior or Circuit Court of Marion County for a review of the decision. The petition for review must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days after the written decision of the board. The City of Indianapolis shall be the sole defendant in the petition for review. Within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of a summons, the city shall cause the merit board to file a true and complete copy of the transcript of the hearing with the court. The court, without jury, shall review the record and render its decision as in other administrative reviews. The clerk of the court shall send a copy of the court's decision to the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department and the appealing officer. Either party may appeal the decision of the court.
(p) For the purpose of all hearings before the disciplinary board of captains and the merit board, each shall have subpoena power enforceable by the circuit or superior court of the county.
(q) A copy of any disciplinary action taken and of the findings of fact and recommendations of the board shall be forwarded to the charged officer. In addition, if an officer is found guilty, notice of the action shall be forwarded to the merit board and made a permanent part of the officer's personnel record.
(G.O. 110, 2005, § 1; G.O. 2, 2008, § 10; G.O. 47, 2009, § 9; G.O. 13, 2016, § 21)