Denver Revised Municipal Code § 37-70 Policy.
Sec. 37-70. - Policy.
(a) Legislative intent. The abatement of public nuisances for the protection of public health, safety, and welfare is a matter of local concern. The most effective tools for abatement of public nuisances are the civil remedial actions provided in this article, including temporary restraining order, impoundment, injunction, closure, receivership, and destruction. The purpose of this article is not to punish, but to remedy public nuisances. The actions provided in this article are designed to remedy public nuisances by removing real property, motor vehicles, and personal property from criminal use and as a base of criminal operations, to ensure that criminal activity and the use of property for criminal purposes is unprofitable, to require that the profits of criminal activity be disgorged, to make property owners vigilant in preventing public nuisance offenses on, in, or by the use of their property, and making property owners responsible for the public nuisance use of their property by tenants, guests and occupants, and to deter public nuisances.
The remedies provided in this article are directed at the property involved without regard to ownership, title or right of possession and the culpability or innocence of those who hold these rights. It is consistent with the remedial purpose of this article initially to provide for a less stringent remedy to be applied to those who demonstrate that they are non-involved owners, as it is more likely that such persons will be law abiding in the future. The remedial actions provided in this article are intended to be civil in nature. The remedies of temporary restraining order, impoundment, closure, receivership, and destruction are intended to be in rem, against the property itself, and not against any individual directly. The remedies of temporary restraining order, civil judgment, and injunction may be partially in personam.
(b) Relief to certain owners. Owners of real property, motor vehicles and personal property used to commit, conduct, promote, facilitate, or aid the commission of or flight from and public nuisance offense will be granted relief from the strict application of the mandatory closure and civil judgment remedies provided in subsections 37-79(a)(1), 37-80(a)(1), and 37-82(a), under the following circumstances:
(1) Where no privity exists between the owner and the offending party, including, but not limited to, offending trespassers, the owner will be entitled to immediate release of such property, where the owner proves by a preponderance of evidence that he or she has:
a. Taken all reasonable steps to preclude access to the property by the offending trespasser or user;
b. Immediately reported the trespass, theft or other criminal violation to a local law enforcement agency; and
c. Fully cooperated with all law enforcement agencies in the investigation and prosecution of the criminal acts relating to or underlying the public nuisance offense.
(2) Where the owner may have privity with the offending party, but such owner shows that all reasonable steps were taken to prevent the proscribed use of the property, and that such owner neither:
a. Participated in the transaction constituting the public nuisance act, nor
b. Knew, or reasonably should have known, that the property would be used in the commission of a public nuisance act, or that the person who used the property illegally had engaged in prior similar conduct or that such person had a prior record or reputation for violating the laws of the United States, State of Colorado, or the City of Denver for related crime.
(c) Good faith application of remedies. In order to ensure that the remedies provided in this article are applied in good faith and for the purpose of public nuisance abatement, the following shall apply:
(1) No city employee's or law enforcement officer's employment or level of salary shall depend upon the frequency or quantity of actions and remedies under this article that he or she produces.
(2) All closures of real property shall be made pursuant to a temporary restraining order based upon a judicial finding of probable cause and only after an opportunity for an adversarial hearing to contest the closure has been provided.
(d) No conflict with state law. This article of chapter 37 is not intended to authorize any act expressly prohibited by state law, or to forbid any conduct expressly authorized by state law. The provisions of this article shall be construed to avoid any such direct and express conflict.
(e) Strict liability. The public nuisance offenses and the provisions of this article III of chapter 37 are entirely strict liability in nature. No allegation or proof of culpability or mens rea of any type or degree by any owner of real property, motor vehicle, or item of personal property shall be required for any filing of a public nuisance action, or the issuance of temporary restraining orders, or remedies under the provisions of this article III of chapter 37.
(f) Comprehensive enforcement scheme. The sections of this article III of chapter 37 are intended to provide a comprehensive scheme for civil public nuisance abatement and should be read together.
(Ord. No. 481-98, § 1, 7-13-98; Ord. No. 671-04, § 2, 9-20-04; Ord. No. 307-19, § 3, 4-22-19)
