§ 17.69.010 — UPSET
City Code of Salt Lake City, Utah (2026 S-21: current through Ord. 49-26, passed September 15, 2026) · Salt Lake City Code § 17.69.010
Corpus is an independent public-information project, not the official City of Salt Lake City website. Stable reference URL
17.69.010: UPSET:
A. For the purposes of this section, "upset" means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with categorical pretreatment standards because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the user. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation. B. An upset shall constitute an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with categorical pretreatment standards if the requirements of subsection C of this section are met. C. A user who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: 1. An upset occurred and the user can identify the cause(s) of the upset; 2. The facility was at the time being operated in a prudent and workmanlike manner and in compliance with applicable operation and maintenance procedures; 3. The user has submitted the following information to the director and treatment plant operator within twenty four (24) hours of becoming aware of the upset (if this information is provided orally, a written submission must be provided within 5 days): a. A description of the indirect discharge and cause of noncompliance; b. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times or, if not corrected, the anticipated time the noncompliance is expected to continue; and c. Steps being taken and/or planned to reduce, eliminate and prevent recurrence of the noncompliance. D. In any enforcement proceeding, the user seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset shall have the burden of proof. E. Users shall have the opportunity for a judicial determination on any claim of upset only in an enforcement action brought for noncompliance with categorical pretreatment standards. F. The user shall control production of all discharges to the extent necessary to maintain compliance with categorical pretreatment standards upon reduction, loss, or failure of its treatment facility until the facility is restored or an alternative method of treatment is provided. This requirement applies in the situation where, among other things, the primary source of power of the treatment facility is reduced, lost or has failed. (Ord. 68-11, 2011)
