HRS div. 1, tit. 11, ch. 159, pt. VI — Inspection Service, Withdrawal and | Hawaii Revised Statutes (official capitol.hawaii.gov pages via Internet Archive captures, 2011-2026; partial) — Hawaii

HRS §159-46 Inspection; overtime compensation

159-46. Inspection; overtime compensation All animals slaughtered by any slaughterhouse duly licensed under this part shall be inspected by an inspector duly authorized by the department, both before and after slaughtering, and no animal shall be slaughtered, or after slaughter be sold, transported, offered for sale or transportation, or received for transportation in commerce unless the slaughtering thereof or the use thereof in commerce, after slaughtering, is approved by an inspector. The management of any processing establishment, slaughterhouse, or the owner of any animal to be slaughtered requiring the services of an inspector in excess of eight consecutive hours on any workday, or in excess of forty hours in any workweek, or on legal holidays, shall pay to the department for overtime inspection services, the current state overtime rate for each hour of work performed by the inspector. The department shall pay the inspector for all overtime inspection services performed; provided that the party requesting or requiring the overtime inspection services shall sufficiently in advance of the overtime period arrange with the department for the services. [L 1969, c 214, pt of §1; am L 1990, c 139, §11; am L 1991, c 88, §1]

HRS §159-48 Refusal and withdrawal of inspection

159-48. Refusal and withdrawal of inspection The board, for the period, or indefinitely, as it deems necessary to effectuate the purposes of this chapter, may refuse to provide, or withdraw, inspection service under this chapter with respect to any establishment if it determines, after opportunity for a hearing is accorded to the applicant for or a recipient of the service, that the applicant or recipient is unfit to engage in any business requiring inspection under this chapter because the applicant or recipient, or anyone responsibly connected with the applicant or recipient, has been convicted, in any federal or state court, of (1) any felony, or (2) more than one violation of any law, based upon the acquiring, handling, or distributing of unwholesome, mislabeled, or deceptively packaged food or upon fraud in connection with transactions in food. This section shall not affect, in any way, the other provisions of this chapter for withdrawal of inspection services from establishments failing to maintain sanitary conditions or to destroy condemned carcasses, parts thereof, or meat or meat products. For the purpose of this section a person shall be deemed to be responsibly connected with the business if the person was a partner, officer, director, holder, or owner of ten per cent or more of its voting stock or an employee in a managerial or executive capacity. The determination and order of the board with respect thereto under this section shall be final and conclusive unless the affected applicant for, or recipient of, inspection service files application for judicial review within thirty days after the effective date of such order in the appropriate court as provided in part VII. Judicial review of any such order shall be upon the record upon which the determination and order are based. [L 1969, c 214, pt of §1; gen ch 1985; am L 1990, c 139, §12; am L 1991, c 88, §1]