Sec. 74-6. - Maximum incentives.
(a) The following conditions shall apply to all applicable incentivized development projects in the city:
(1) TIF commission. That, in the absence of extraordinary qualifications, as hereinafter defined, the city council shall not approve any redevelopment plan providing for, with respect to payments in lieu of taxes ("PILOTS") pursuant to section 99.845.1(2)(a), RSMo, the redirection of such sums in an amount that would exceed 70 percent of the PILOTS captured by the special allocation fund for a term of up to ten years and 30 percent for up to five additional years. The city council shall accomplish the same by excluding from any pledge of funds in and to be deposited in the special allocation fund an amount equal to 30 percent of the PILOTS for years one through ten and 70 percent for years eleven through fifteen, and shall, to the extent permitted by law, annually surplus such sums for distribution by the applicable county collector in accordance with section 99.850.1, RSMo.
(2) PIEA. That, in the absence of extraordinary qualifications, as hereinafter defined, the city council shall not grant its approval to any plan, or substantial modification thereto, recommended by the PIEA unless such plan shall provide for not greater than a 70 percent abatement of real property taxes for up to ten years and 30 percent for up to five additional years, and which taxes shall, for the entire term, be measured by the assessed valuation thereof, inclusive of any improvements, as assessed by the applicable county assessor. The inclusion of such a term shall be regarded as a substantial element of any plan so approved and shall be incorporated as a material term of any applicable contract.
(3) LCRA. That, in the absence of extraordinary qualifications, as hereinafter defined, the city council shall not grant its approval to any redevelopment plan, urban renewal plan, or substantial modification thereto, recommended by the LCRA unless such plan shall provide for not greater than a 70 percent abatement of real or personal property taxes for the duration of the public incentives, and which taxes shall, for the entire term, be measured by the assessed valuation thereof, inclusive of any improvements, as assessed by the applicable county assessor. The inclusion of such a term shall be regarded as a substantial element of any plan so approved and shall be incorporated as a material term of any applicable contract.
(4) Chapter 353. That, in the absence of extraordinary qualifications, as hereinafter defined, the city council shall not its approval to any development plan or substantial modification thereto recommended by the Kansas City Chapter 353 Advisory Board, unless such plan shall provide for not greater than a 70 percent abatement of real or personal property taxes for up to ten years and 30 percent for up to five additional years, and which taxes shall, for the entire term, be measured by the assessed valuation thereof, inclusive of any improvements, as assessed by the applicable county assessor. The inclusion of such a term shall be regarded as a substantial element of any plan so approved and shall be incorporated as a material term of any applicable contract.
(5) Chapter 100. That the city council reaffirms its policies as established by committee substitute for resolution no. 041033. In the absence of extraordinary qualifications, as hereinafter defined, any leaseback structure pursuant to the provisions of sections 100.010 through 100.200, RSMo, shall not exceed ten years and shall ensure that the lessee thereunder be contractually obligated to tender payments in lieu of taxes in an amount not less than 50 percent of the amount of real property taxes that would have been due and payable but for the public ownership of the real property for the duration of the public incentives, and which taxes shall, for the entire term, be measured by the assessed valuation thereof, inclusive of any improvements, as assessed by the applicable county assessor. Such requirement shall be incorporated as a material term of any applicable contract.
(6) EEZ. That, in the absence of extraordinary qualifications, as hereinafter defined, the city council shall not grant its approval to any plan, or substantial modification thereto, recommended by an enhanced enterprise zone board unless such plan shall provide for not greater than a 70 percent abatement of the value of improvements for up to ten years and 30 percent for up to five additional years. The inclusion of such a term shall be regarded as a substantial element of any plan so approved and shall be incorporated as a material term of any applicable contract.
(b) That in the event any provision of subdivision (a) of this section is deemed unenforceable by reason that it conflicts with a provision of state law providing for a differing level of abatement for all or any portion of the term of the public incentives, or providing that the assessed valuation be determined by some other measure than is set forth therein, then the LCRA, PIEA or City, as applicable, shall, to the maximum extent permitted by law, contractually require payments in lieu of taxes structured to achieve the objectives of this ordinance, such payments to be distributed pro rata to the affected taxing jurisdictions. Such requirement shall be included within the body of the redevelopment plan, urban renewal plan, plan, or development plan, as applicable, and shall be regarded as a substantial element of any plan so approved.
(c) Extraordinary qualifications. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this ordinance, the city council and any economic development agency created by the city shall retain the discretion to authorize the abatement, redirection or exemption, in whole or in part, of ad valorem real property taxes to the full extent authorized by any provision of law. The city council shall give particular consideration to the following exception to the above policies ("extraordinary qualifications") in determining whether to authorize any abatement/exemption structure, or approve any development plan providing for incentives to be conveyed on a project-specific basis at any level other than what has been provided for herein. Any economic development agency created by the city shall only grant an exception to this policy if the project meets an extraordinary qualifications. The extraordinary qualifications are:
(1) Projects located in a severely distressed census tract that has continuously maintained such status for not less than ten years immediately prior to the effective date of the request; or
(2) Projects that support affordable housing and extremely affordable housing by meeting the requirements of section 74-11.
(3) Projects that connect residents living in continuously distressed census tracts to new employment opportunities by:
a. providing at least 100 new entry-level jobs to Kansas City with an annual salary of at least $32,000.00, or $42,000.00 inclusive of wages and benefits; and
b. Incorporating options for mass public transportation or locating in an established high-frequency transit corridor.
(4) Projects that involve the renovation or rehabilitation of a building that has been designated by a government entity as a local or national historic landmark or contributes to a historic district, or projects that have filed an application with the National Park Service to be placed on the National Register of Historic Places, win which case the exclusion would be subject to such designation being approved.
(5) Projects that are industrial in nature and support manufacturing or serve as a distribution center.
(d) Determination of eligibility for extraordinary qualifications shall be made upon receipt by the city or any economic development agency created by the city including Port KC of an application or request for ad valorem real and personal property tax abatement, exemption or redirection.
(e) The city manager shall annually update and publish maps indicating the locations of continuously distressed census tracts utilizing comparisons of American community standards 5-year estimates for the most recently published 5-year range and the two prior but non-overlapping 5-year ranges.
(Ord. No. 251058, § 6, 2-5-26)