APPENDIX F: AUTHORITY AND DUTIES OF CITY SERVICES AUDITOR

SF-CHARTER pt. APPENDIX F: AUTHORITY AND DUTIES OF CITY SERVICES AUDITOR

in effect

SF Charter § F1.100 FINDINGS.

F1.100. FINDINGS. (a) City residents rely upon the government of the City and County to deliver many important services affecting the health, vitality and economy of San Francisco. These include services related to the maintenance and cleanliness of streets and parks, health care, emergency services, transportation and public works. Recognizing the difficult economic times the City faces, preservation and enhancement of such services can be achieved only by ensuring that City services are delivered in an efficient, cost- effective manner, and that government waste and unnecessary bureaucracy are curtailed to the greatest extent possible. (b) It is often difficult for individual San Franciscans to judge the effectiveness and efficiency of local government in providing direct services to residents because of the size and complexity of City government. Consistent with the goals of open government, City government should establish tools to enable residents to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of City services; to compare the City's progress in delivering such services to that of other cities, counties and government agencies; and, where appropriate, to adopt "best practices" used in other jurisdictions when consistent with the goals of San Francisco residents. (c) The San Francisco Controller is uniquely situated to provide objective, rigorous measurement of City service levels and effectiveness because the Controller is already charged with assessment of departmental performance and fiscal soundness. In addition, the Controller is appointed to a ten-year term, and therefore is sufficiently independent to render impartial assessments of the City's provision of public services. (d) Therefore, this Charter Amendment: (1) Establishes the Controller as the City Services Auditor, with the authority to conduct independent management and performance audits of departments providing services to San Francisco residents; (2) Instructs the Controller/City Services Auditor to publish comparisons of the performance of San Francisco departments, the services they deliver, and the outcomes they achieve with other public agencies; (3) Requires that the Controller/City Services Auditor perform comprehensive financial and performance audits of selected City departments each year; (4) Mandates that the Controller/City Services Auditor review standards for street and park maintenance in consultation with responsible City departments and perform an annual Clean Streets/Clean Parks audit to track whether these standards are met; (5) Provides the Controller/City Services Auditor the authority to review Citywide standards for government contracting processes and the development of "Requests For Proposals" to ensure that the selection process is fair and unbiased; (6) Prohibits conflicts of interest in the auditing process by preventing companies that have participated in departmental operations from acting as outside auditors, requiring that all employees participating in audits be designated confidential employees for labor-relations purposes, and permitting the Controller to obtain outside independent assistance when in-house employees are subject to potential conflicts of interest; (7) Requires the Controller/City Services Auditor to administer and publicize a whistleblower hotline and website for citizens and employees to report wrongdoing, waste, inefficient practices and poor performance in City government and service delivery; (8) Authorizes the Citizens' General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee to also function as an independent Citizens Audit Review Board to advise the Controller/City Services Auditor, to recommend departments in need of comprehensive audit, and to review citizen complaints received through the whistleblower program; and (9) Provides a dedicated source of revenue equivalent to two-tenths of one percent of the budget of the City and County of San Francisco. (Added November 2003)

SF Charter § F1.101 CITY SERVICES AUDITOR; SERVICES AUDIT UNIT.

F1.101. CITY SERVICES AUDITOR; SERVICES AUDIT UNIT. (a) In addition to the other duties prescribed by this Charter, the Controller shall perform the duties of a City Services Auditor, responsible for monitoring the level and effectiveness of services provided by the government of the City and County of San Francisco to the people of San Francisco. The City Services Auditor shall establish and maintain a Services Audit Unit in the Controller's Office to ensure the financial integrity and improve the overall performance and efficiency of City government. The Services Audit Unit shall review performance and cost benchmarks developed by City departments in consultation with the Controller and based on their departmental efficiency plans under Chapter 88 of the Administrative Code, and conduct comparisons of the cost and performance of San Francisco City government with other cities, counties, and public agencies performing similar functions. In particular, the Services Audit Unit shall assess: (1) Measures of workload addressing the level of service being provided or providing an assessment of need for a service; (2) Measures of efficiency including cost per unit of service provided, cost per unit of output, or the units of service provided per full time equivalent position; and (3) Measures of effectiveness including the quality of service provided, citizen perceptions of quality, and the extent a service meets the needs for which it was created. (b) The service areas for which data is collected and comparisons conducted shall include, but not be limited to: (1) The cleanliness and condition of streets, sidewalks, and the urban environment and landscape; (2) The performance of other public works and government-controlled public utilities, including water and clean water programs; (3) Parks, cultural, and recreational facilities; (4) Transportation, as measured by the standards set out in Charter Section 8A.103, provided, however, that primary responsibility for such assessment shall continue to be exercised by the Municipal Transportation Agency pursuant to Charter Section 8A.100 et seq.; (5) The criminal justice system, including the Police Department, Juvenile and Adult Probation Departments, Sheriff, District Attorney, and Public Defender; (6) Fire and paramedic services; (7) Public health, human services, and services relating to homelessness; (8) City management; and, (9) Human resources functions, including personnel and labor relations. (c) The information obtained using the service measurement standards set forth above shall be compiled on at least an annual basis, and the results of such benchmark studies, as well as comparative data, shall be available on the City’s website. (Added November 2003; amended by Proposition C, Approved 11/8/2022)

SF Charter § F1.102 STREET, SIDEWALK, AND PARK CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE.

F1.102. STREET, SIDEWALK, AND PARK CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE. (a) The Services Audit Unit shall conduct annually a performance audit of the City’s street, sidewalk, and public park maintenance and cleaning operations. The annual audit shall: (1) Include quantifiable, measurable, objective standards for street, sidewalk, and park maintenance, to be developed in cooperation and consultation with the Department of Public Works and the Recreation and Park Department; (2) Based upon such measures, report on the condition of each geographic portion of the City; (3) To the extent that standards are not met, assess the causes of such failure and make recommendations of actions that will enhance the achievement of those standards in the future; (4) Ensure that all bond funds related to streets, parks and open space are spent in strict accordance with the stated purposes and permissible uses of such bonds, as approved by the voters. Outside of the audit process, the City departments charged with cleaning and maintaining streets, sidewalks, and parks shall remain responsible for addressing individual complaints regarding specific sites, although the Controller may receive and investigate such complaints under Section F1.107. (b) In addition, all City agencies engaged in street, sidewalk, or park maintenance shall establish regular maintenance schedules for streets, sidewalks, parks and park facilities, which shall be available to the public and on the department’s website. Each such department shall monitor compliance with these schedules, and shall publish regularly data showing the extent to which the department has met its published schedules. The City Services Audit Unit shall audit each department’s compliance with these requirements annually, and shall furnish recommendations for meaningful ways in which information regarding the timing, amount and kind of services provided may be gathered and furnished to the public. (Added November 2003; amended by Proposition B, Approved 11/3/2020; Proposition B, Approved 11/8/2022)

SF Charter § F1.103 MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.

F1.103. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. The City Services Audit Unit shall: (1) Conduct and publish an annual review of management and employment practices, including City policies and MOU provisions, that either promote or impede the effective and efficient operation of City government; (2) Identify the top five City departments by workers compensation claims, list the cost of these claims, and recommend ways to reduce both workplace injuries and improper claims; (3) Identify the top five departments by overtime expenditures and report on the cause and potential mitigations for any excessive overtime spending; and, (4) Conduct best practices reviews and other studies and assist departments in implementing their findings. (Added November 2003)

SF Charter § F1.104 PERFORMANCE AUDITS.

F1.104. PERFORMANCE AUDITS. The City Services Audit Unit shall conduct periodic, comprehensive financial and performance audits of City departments, services, and activities. Except as provided in Section F1.102, the Controller shall have discretion to select, on a rotating basis, departments, services, and activities for audit, giving priority to matters affecting direct services to the residents of the City and County of San Francisco. In selecting audit subjects, the Controller shall give preference to requests for performance audits made by the Audit Review Board, the Mayor, the Board of Supervisors, department heads, and commissions; provided, however, that absent extraordinary circumstances, no department, activity, or service shall be subject to repeated audits in two successive years. (Added November 2003)

SF Charter § F1.105 AUDIT RESULTS.

F1.105. AUDIT RESULTS. (a) Before making public any portion of any draft, notes, preliminary or final report relating to the operations or activities of a City officer or agency, the Controller shall deliver a copy of the draft report to any such officer, and to the head of any agency discussed in such report and provide the officer and agency, in writing, with a reasonable deadline for their review and response. The Controller shall include in any report, or portion thereof that is made public, a copy or summary of all such officer and agency responses. In addition, the audit shall include an analysis of the anticipated costs and/or savings of any recommendations contained in the report. (b) The Controller shall publish the results of all final performance audits and a summary of agency responses, shall deliver copies of such audits to relevant department heads, Audit Review Board, Mayor, City Attorney, Board of Supervisors, San Francisco Civil Grand Jury, and San Francisco Public Library, and shall make the audits available on the City's website. Each department subject to recommendations by the Controller shall include with its next two annual budget requests following such audit a report on the status of the Controller's recommendations. In particular, the report shall include: (1) the Controller's final audit recommendations; (2) a plan to address the Controller's findings and to implement the Controller's recommendations; (3) any costs or savings reflected in the proposed budget attributable to implementation of Controller recommendations; and (4) a statement of the recommendations that the department does not intend to implement and the basis of the department head's determination not to adopt the Controller's recommendation. (c) To avoid conflicts of interest, all employees engaged in preparation of audits shall be designated as confidential employees. If the Controller determines that any member of the regular audit staff is unable to participate in an audit due to a potential conflict of interest, or as a result of the employee's collective bargaining representation, the Controller shall have the option of assigning other employees regardless of civil service job description, hiring outside experts, or contracting for such services with an outside individual or agency. (Added November 2003)

SF Charter § F1.106 OVERSIGHT OF CONTRACTING PROCEDURES.

F1.106. OVERSIGHT OF CONTRACTING PROCEDURES. The Controller shall have the duty to perform regular oversight of the City’s contracting procedures, including developing model criteria and terms for City Requests for Proposals (RFPs), and auditing compliance with City contracting rules and procedures. Where appropriate, the Inspector General shall investigate cases of alleged abuse or conflict of interest. Should the Inspector General find that there has been an abuse or conflict of interest, the Inspector General shall refer that finding to the Ethics Commission, the District Attorney, and the City Attorney for possible enforcement action. Nothing in this Section F1.106 shall be construed to alter the existing jurisdiction of City departments and agencies with respect to contracting. (Added November 2003; amended by Proposition C, Approved 11/5/2024)

SF Charter § F1.107 CITIZENS' COMPLAINTS; WHISTLEBLOWERS.

F1.107. CITIZENS' COMPLAINTS; WHISTLEBLOWERS. (a) The Controller shall have the authority to receive individual complaints concerning the quality and delivery of government services; wasteful and inefficient City government practices; misuse of City government funds; and improper activities by City government officers and employees, by persons or entities that have or are seeking a contract, grant, lease, loan, or other agreement with the City and County, and their employees or officers; by applicants for or recipients of permits, licenses, land use entitlements, tax incentives, benefits, or services from the City and County, and their employees or officers; or by registered City lobbyists. When appropriate, the Controller shall investigate and otherwise attempt to resolve such individual complaints except for those which: (1) another City agency is required by federal, state, or local law to adjudicate, (2) may be resolved through a grievance mechanism established by collective bargaining agreement or contract, or (3) are subject to an existing, ongoing investigation by the District Attorney, the City Attorney, or the Ethics Commission, where either official or the Commission states in writing that investigation by the Controller would substantially impede or delay their own investigation of the matter. If the Controller receives a complaint described in items (1), (2), or (3) of this subsection (a), the Controller shall advise the complainant of the appropriate procedure for the resolution of such complaint. (b) If the Controller receives a complaint alleging conduct that may constitute a violation of criminal law or a governmental ethics law, the Inspector General shall review the complaint and decide whether to initiate an investigation. Thereafter, the Inspector General shall promptly refer complaints regarding criminal conduct to the District Attorney or other appropriate law enforcement agency and shall refer complaints regarding violations of governmental ethics laws to the Ethics Commission and the City Attorney. After referring a complaint to the District Attorney, Ethics Commission, or City Attorney, the Inspector General may investigate the matter in coordination with the department receiving the complaint. The Inspector General may decline to refer a complaint to the District Attorney, Ethics Commission, or City Attorney if the complaint relates to the conduct of that agency. In that circumstance, the Inspector General may refer the complaint to another City, State, or federal agency with jurisdiction over the matter. Nothing in this Section F1.107 shall preclude the Controller from investigating whether any alleged criminal conduct also violates any civil or administrative law, statute, ordinance, or regulation. (c) Notwithstanding any provision of this Charter, including, but not limited to Section C3.699-11, or any ordinance or regulation of the City and County of San Francisco, the Controller shall administer a whistleblower and citizen complaint hotline telephone number and website and publicize the hotline and website through press releases, public advertising, and communications to City employees. The Controller shall receive and track calls and emails related to complaints about the quality and delivery of government services, wasteful and inefficient City government practices, misuse of government funds and improper activities by City government officials, employees and contractors and shall route these complaints to the appropriate agency subject to subsection (a) of this Section F1.107. The Board of Supervisors shall enact and maintain an ordinance protecting the confidentiality of whistleblowers, and protecting City officers and employees from retaliation for filing a complaint with, or providing information to, the Controller, Ethics Commission, District Attorney, City Attorney or a City department or commission about improper government activity by City officers and employees. The City may incorporate all whistleblower functions set forth in this Charter or by ordinances into a unified City call center, switchboard, or information number at a later time, provided the supervision of the whistleblower function remains with the Controller and its responsibilities and function continue unabridged. (Added November 2003; amended by Proposition C, Approved 11/5/2024)

SF Charter § F1.108 CUSTOMER SERVICE PLANS.

F1.108. CUSTOMER SERVICE PLANS. The Controller shall assess the progress of City departments' compliance with Charter Section 16.120 and any implementing ordinances requiring City departments to prepare effective customer service plans. The Controller shall make recommendations to departments to improve the effectiveness of such plans. The Controller shall report to the Board of Supervisors and Mayor the failure of any department to comply substantially with the Controller's recommendations regarding customer service plans. (Added November 2003)

SF Charter § F1.109 LEGISLATION.

F1.109. LEGISLATION. The Controller may propose legislation to the Board of Supervisors and the Mayor to improve City programs and services and to make the delivery of such programs and services more efficient. (Added November 2003)

SF Charter § F1.110 ACCESS TO RECORDS; PRELIMINARY REPORTS.

F1.110. ACCESS TO RECORDS; PRELIMINARY REPORTS. (a) The Controller shall have timely access to all records and documents the Controller deems necessary to complete the inquiries and reviews required by this Appendix F. If a City officer, employee, agency, department, or commission does not comply with the Controller’s request for such records and documents, the Controller may issue a subpoena consistent with the Controller’s authority under Section 3.105(b). The provisions of this Section F1.110 shall not apply to those records and documents of City agencies for which a claim of privilege has been properly and appropriately raised, or which are prepared or maintained by the City Attorney, the District Attorney, or the Ethics Commission for use in any investigation authorized by federal, state, or local law. (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Charter, or any ordinance or regulation of the City and County, and except to the extent required by state or federal law, all drafts, notes, preliminary reports of Controller’s benchmark studies, audits, investigations, and other reports shall be confidential. (Added November 2003; amended by Proposition C, Approved 11/5/2024)

SF Charter § F1.111 CITIZENS AUDIT REVIEW BOARD.

F1.111. CITIZENS AUDIT REVIEW BOARD. In addition to its duties under Article V of Chapter 5 of the Administrative Code, the Citizens' General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee shall serve as a Citizens Audit Review Board. In its role as the Review Board, the Oversight Committee shall provide advisory input to the Controller on matters pertaining to the functions set forth in this Appendix, and, in particular, shall: (1) Review the Controller's service standards and benchmarks to ensure their accuracy and usefulness; (2) Review all audits to ensure that they meet the requirements set forth above; (3) Subject to appropriate rules ensuring the confidentiality of complainants, as well as the confidentiality of complaints referred to and handled by the District Attorney, the City Attorney, and the Ethics Commission, review citizen and employee complaints received through the whistleblower/complaint hotline and website and the Controller's disposition of those complaints; and (4) Where it deems appropriate, hold public hearings regarding the results of benchmark studies and audits to encourage the adoption of "best practices" consistent with the conclusions of the studies and audits. An audio or video recording of such hearings shall be made available for public inspection free of charge. (Added November 2003)

SF Charter § F1.112 OUTSIDE EXPERTS.

F1.112. OUTSIDE EXPERTS. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Charter or any ordinance or regulation of the City and County of San Francisco, the Controller shall be authorized to contract with outside, independent experts to assist in performing the requirements of this Appendix. In doing so, the Controller shall make good faith efforts as defined in Chapter 12D of the Administrative Code to comply with the provisions of Chapters 12 et seq. of the Administrative Code, but shall not be subject to the approval processes of other City agencies. The Controller shall submit an annual report to the Board of Supervisors summarizing any contracts issued pursuant to this Section and discussing the Controller's compliance with Chapters 12 et seq. Contracts issued by the Controller pursuant to this Section shall be subject, where applicable, to the requirements of Section 9.118. (b) No outside expert or firm shall be eligible to participate or assist in an audit or investigation of any issue, matter, or question as to which that expert or firm has previously rendered compensated advice or services to any individual, corporation or City department other than the Controller. The Controller shall adopt appropriate written regulations implementing this provision, and shall incorporate this requirement in all written contracts with outside experts and firms utilized pursuant to this Section. (Added November 2003)

SF Charter § F1.113 CONTROLLER'S AUDIT FUND.

F1.113. CONTROLLER'S AUDIT FUND. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Charter, the Mayor and Board of Supervisors shall be required to budget an amount equal to at least two-tenths of one percent (0.2%) of the City’s overall budget, apportioned by fund and excluding bond related debt, to implement this Appendix F and to support the staffing and operations of the Inspector General. This amount shall be referred to as the Controller’s Audit Fund, and shall be used exclusively to implement the duties and requirements of this Appendix F and to support the staffing and operations of the Inspector General, and shall not be used to displace funding for the non-audit related functions of the Controller’s Office existing prior to November 4, 2003. If the funds are not expended or encumbered by the end of the fiscal year, the balance in the fund shall revert to the General Fund or the enterprise funds where it originated. (Added November 2003; amended by Proposition C, Approved 11/5/2024) F1.114. [REPEALED.] (Added November 2003; repealed by Proposition C, Approved 11/5/2024)

Source: City and County of San Francisco, Charter and Municipal Codes (American Legal Publishing, codelibrary.amlegal.com)URL: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/san_francisco/latest/sf_charter/0-0-0-4188Fetched: 11/1/2026