11.16.317 - Establishing, expanding and reducing restricted parking zones
A. The Director of Transportation or the Director's designee shall consider whether a restricted parking zone (RPZ) within a designated area, would promote certain benefits or would result in adverse impacts.
1. Benefits that may lead to establishing an RPZ include, but are not limited to: increased access for area residents, reduced traffic congestion, increased traffic or pedestrian safety, reduced air or noise pollution, reduced commuter parking in neighborhoods, prevention of blighted areas, and promoting the use of alternative modes of transportation.
2. Adverse impacts that may prevent establishing and RPZ include, but are not limited to: transferring a parking problem to a different area, inability to effectively enforce program restrictions, lack of alternative transportation modes, and availability of simpler, cheaper or more effective solutions.
3. Regardless of potential benefits or adverse impacts that may result, the Seattle Department of Transportation will not install RPZs in any downtown zone, including all zones contained in Map 1A of Chapter 23.49, in part because of high demand and multiple, competing needs for on-street parking.
B. The Director of Transportation may establish a new or expand an existing restricted parking zone whenever 75 percent or more of the capacity of the streets available for parking on ten contiguous blocks (and/or 20 block faces) in such designated area is generally occupied; over 35 percent of the vehicles parked on the street in the area are not owned by residents of the designated area; a strong and effective community engagement effort indicating that generally stakeholders in the designated area have reviewed and support the restricted parking zone, which could include a petition signed by a majority of the residents in the designated area in support of the restricted parking zone; and the public interest would be served. In cases where the criteria listed above are not met, the Director of Transportation is authorized to establish a restricted parking zone when, in the Director's judgment, the parking problem will be ameliorated by a restricted parking zone and the public interest would be served.
C. The Director of Transportation or the Director's designee is authorized to engage affected and interested community stakeholders to review and assist in refining any future RPZ proposals.
1. The public information and involvement program may include department presentations to business and community organizations, information distribution through the City's web site, news releases and related media, direct mailings of informational materials, facilitated meetings, sounding boards, walking tours, surveys, and other techniques as appropriate to the scale of the proposal.
2. Prior to the Director of Transportation's decision to establish, not to establish, to dissolve, to expand, or to reduce an RPZ by more than two contiguous blocks, the Seattle Department of Transportation shall hold a public hearing where it will provide interested persons an opportunity to submit written and spoken comment into the public record.
3. At least 20 days prior to the public hearing, the Seattle Department of Transportation shall mail a notice of hearing containing the hearing time and location to all owners, commercial lessees and residents of property within 300 feet of the affected restricted parking zone.
4. At least 20 days prior to the public hearing, the Seattle Department of Transportation shall publish in a local newspaper a notice of the hearing that states the hearing time and location.
D. 1.
The Director of Transportation's decision to establish, not to establish, to expand, to reduce, or to dissolve a restricted parking zone is subject to reconsideration within 15 days of publication in a local newspaper. Requests for reconsideration may be initiated, in writing, by residents, business owners, or employees or volunteers in or adjacent to the proposed RPZ. On reconsideration, the Director shall designate a review officer, who shall, after reviewing the reconsideration materials and other relevant information, make a recommendation to the Director. The Director may, at the Director's discretion, stay implementation of a decision pending review. The Director shall have 30 days to issue a Decision. The Director's decision on reconsideration shall be final unless appealed to the Office of the Hearing Examiner under subsection 11.16.317.D.2. Grounds for reconsideration include the validity of any parking study or compliance with the process to establish a zone.
2. The Director's decision on reconsideration may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner.
a. Time limit for initiation of an appeal. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Hearing Examiner within 20 days following issuance of the Director's Decision on Reconsideration.
b. Form of Appeal. The notice of appeal must contain a brief statement of the issues on appeal, the specific objections to the decision being appealed, along with supporting facts and documentation, and the relief sought. The notice of appeal must list the name of the appellant, and the signature, address, phone number, and fax and e-mail address if available, of the person appealing.
c. Decision. After reviewing the notice of appeal and supporting documentation and conducting a hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall issue a written decision within 30 days after the conclusion of the hearing. The written decision shall contain the reasons for the decision and the provisions for further appeal and shall be provided to the person appealing and to the Director. This decision is the final decision of the City.
E. The Director may modify hours of an existing RPZ or expand or reduce boundaries of an existing RPZ by two contiguous blocks or less by following an administrative process that seeks to identify possible changes suggested by the community, review proposed changes to the RPZ with affected community stakeholders, and make a determination for what best serves the public interest, without holding the public hearing required by subsection 11.16.317.C.2.
F. A restriction of parking shall first take effect on a street segment when it is signed or posted, and shall cease when the signs or posting are removed pursuant to lawful order; provided that vandalism or destruction of parking control signs shall not affect the validity of a restriction upon parking on any street segment designated by the Director of Transportation if other signs or traffic control devices give notice that parking in the street segment is restricted.
G. The Director may initiate dissolution of an RPZ when the Director determines that dissolution best serves the public interest and meets at least one of the following criteria, including but not limited to, low permit sales in a zone, a small number of blocks with RPZ signs, or the absence of the original traffic generator. The zone would be removed at the beginning of a new permit cycle.
(Ord. 123899, § 11, 2012; Ord. 123120, § 4, 2009; Ord. 123001, § 6, 2009; Ord. 118409 § 23, 1996: Ord. 118369 § 3, 1996: Ord. 117235, § 2, 1994: Ord. 117108, § 1, 1994; Ord. 115995, § 7, 1991; Ord. 113240 § 1, 1986: Ord. 108354 § 2, 1979: Ord. 108200, § 2 (11.16.317), 1979.)