o0170-25

FILE NO. 240803 AMENDED IN COMMITTEE 7/28/2025 ORDINANCE NO. 170-25 [Planning, Building Codes - Unauthorized and Rent-Controlled Dwelling Units] Ordinance amending the Planning Code to require applicants to disclose the presence of any Unauthorized Dwelling Unit, and require the Planning Department to investigate any Unauthorized Dwelling Unit, upon submittal of a Development Application; require the Planning Department to document when a property is subject to a regulatory agreement subjecting any units on the property to the San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance; and require the Planning Department to inspect properties prior to recommending approval of any loss of a Residential Unit or Unauthorized Dwelling Unit; amending the Building Code to expand the Department of Building Inspection's Expanded Compliance Control Program to address fraud, bribery, and failure to accurately represent the presence and number of Unauthorized Dwelling Units at properties subject to a permit application; affirming the Planning Department's determination under the California Environmental Quality Act, making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. NOTE: Unchanged Code text and uncodified text are in plain Arial font. Additions to Codes are in single-underline italics Times New Roman font. Deletions to Codes are in stri,'«J.'l-1r0'Elgh italics Times ,"'kw R0m6:nfon.t. Board amendment additions are in double-underlined Arial font. Board amendment deletions are in strikethrough Arial font. Asterisks (* * * *) indicate the omission of unchanged Code subsections or parts of tables. Be it ordained by the People of the City and County of San Francisco: Section 1. Environmental and Land Use Findings. Supervisor Melgar BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 (a) The Planning Department has determined that the actions contemplated in this ordinance comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.). Said determination is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in File No. 240803 and is incorporated herein by reference. The Board affirms this determination. (b) On October 17, 2024, the Planning Commission, in Resolution No. 21627, adopted findings that the actions contemplated in this ordinance are consistent, on balance, with the City's General Plan and eight priority policies of Planning Code Section 101.1 . The Board adopts these findings as its own. A copy of said Resolution is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in File No. 240803, and is incorporated herein by reference. (c) Pursuant to Planning Code Section 302, this Board finds that these Planning Code amendments will serve the public necessity, convenience, and welfare for the reasons set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 21627, and the Board adopts such reasons as its own. A copy of said resolution is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in File No. 240803 and is incorporated herein by reference. (d) On July 16, 2025, the Building Inspection Commission considered this ordinance at a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to Charter Section 4.121 and Building Code Section 104A.2.11 .1.1. (e) No local findings are required under California Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7 because the amendments to the Building Code contained in this ordinance do not regulate materials or manner of construction or repair, and instead relate in their entirety to administrative procedures for implementing the code, which are expressly excluded from the definition of a "building standard" by California Health and Safety Code Section 18909(c). Supervisor Melgar BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 Section 2. Articles 1.7, 2, and 3 of the Planning Code are hereby amended by revising Sections 175,176,206.3, 206.5, 206.6, 207,207.1, 249.94, 306.1, and 317, to read as follows: SEC. 175. APPROVAL OF PERMITS OR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. (a) No application for a building permit. Development Application. or other permit or license, or for a permit of Occupancy, shall be approved by the Planning Department, and no permit or license shall be issued by any City department, which would authorize a new use, a change of use or maintenance of an existing use of any land or structure contrary to the provisions of this Code. * * * * (I) Whenever this Code requires a propertv owner to enter into a regulatory agreement with the City subiecling any dwelling units lo the San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance (Chapter 37 ofthe Administralive Code). the PlanningDeparlmenL shall note the existence of the recorded regulatory agreement on a publicly-accessible website. SEC. 176. ENFORCEMENT AGAINST VIOLATIONS. * * * * (c) Penalties. (1) Administrative Penalties. (A) General Violations. The Zoning Administrator, by issuance of the NOV, may assess upon the Responsible Party an administrative penalty for each violation in an amount up to $1,000 for each day the violation continues unabated. For purposes of this subsection (c)(1 )(A), each real property address, and each commercial or dwelling unit within a multi-unit real property address, affected by a violation is a distinct violation for calculation of applicable administrative penalties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a violation of this Code that Supervisor Melgar BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 affects a common area, feature, or shared detached feature of a multi-unit structure may be treated as a distinct violation of this Code, at the reasonable discretion of the Zoning Administrator. Mis,:epresentations made on any Applications or plans submitted to the Planning Department shall also constitute a violation ofthis Code for the purposes o[!his~Section 176. The NOV may be appealed in the manner provided in subsection (c)(1 )(DE). * * * * (C) Penalties for Specified Violations. * * * * (iii) Misrepresentations of Material Tenant lnformatio11 011 Development Application. For misrepresentation of material information within any Development Application or Building Permit involving a failure to disclose the presence oftenants or a misrepresentation o[lenanl history at a site. the Responsible Partv shall be liable for a penalty of up to $150. 000 upon issuance o[an NOV In determining the appropriate penalty amount. i{any. the Zoning Administrator or the Zoning Administrator's designee shall consider: a. whether the misrepresentation was intentional. grQSSl'i negligent. or negligent; b. the financial gain to the Responsible Party: c. the degree to which the proiect would have been affected (including. for example, the number ofproiect units affected): d the number and fi-equency of misrepresentations by Lhe Responsible Party: e. efforts made by the Responsible Party to correct the misrewesenlation: f such other factors as the Zoning Administrator determines to be relevant. based on the particular facts and circumstances o[lhe misrepresentation: and Supervisor Melgar BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page4 g. such other factors as the Planning Commission determines to be relevant following a public hearing. Within 12 months of the effective date oft he ordinance in Board File No. 240803 amending thi Section 176, the Planning Commission shall adopt anv additional relevant factors and criteria for consideration, to be updated as necessary or appropriate from time to time, to provide guidance to the Zoning Administrator when determining the appropriate penalty amount for violations subiecl to this subsection (c)Q )(C)(iii). * * * * SEC. 206.3. HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES MEAN EQUITY - SAN FRANCISCO PROGRAM. * * * * (e) Implementation. * * * * (5) Regulatory Agreements. Recipients of development bonuses under this Section 206.3 shall enter into a Regulatory Agreement with the City, as follows. (A) The terms of the agreement shall be acceptable in form and content to the Planning Director, the Director of MOHCD, and the City Attorney. The Planning Director shall have the authority to execute such agreements. (8) Following execution of the agreement by all parties, the completed Regulatory Agreement, or memorandum thereof, shall be recorded and the conditions filed and recorded on the Housing Project. The Planning Department shall note the existence of any recorded Regulatory Agreement applicable to the Housing Proiect on a publicly-accessible website. * * * * Supervisor Melgar BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 5 SEC. 206.5. STATE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM: ANALYZED. * * * * (f) Regulatory Agreements. Recipients of a Density Bonus, Incentive, Concession, waiver, or modification shall enter into a Regulatory Agreement with the City, as follows. ( 1) The terms of the agreement shall be acceptable in form and content to the Planning Director, the Director of MOHCD, and the City Attorney. The Planning Director shall have the authority to execute such agreements. (2) Following execution of the agreement by all parties, the completed Density Bonus Regulatory Agreement, or memorandum thereof, shall be recorded and the conditions filed and recorded on the Housing Project. The Planning Department shall note the existence of anv recorded Regulatory Agreement applicable to the Housing Pro;ect on a publicly-accessible website. SEC. 206.6. STATE DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM: INDIVIDUALLY REQUESTED. * * * * (f) Regulatory Agreements. Recipients of a Density Bonus, Incentive, Concession, waiver, or modification shall enter into a Regulatory Agreement with the City, as follows. (1) The terms of the agreement shall be acceptable in form and content to the Planning Director, the Director of MOHCD, and the City Attorney. The Planning Director shall have the authority to execute such agreements. (2) Following execution of the agreement by all parties, the completed Density Bonus Regulatory Agreement, or memorandum thereof, shall be recorded and the conditions filed and recorded on the Housing Project. The Planning Department shall note the existence of any recorded RegulaLoryAgreement applicable to the HousingPro;ecL on a publicly-accessible website. Supervisor Melgar BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 6 * * * * SEC. 207. DWELLING UNIT DENSITY LIMITS. * * * * (c) Exceptions to Dwelling Unit Density Limits. An exception to the calculations under this Section 207 shall be made in the following circumstances: * * * * (8) Residential Density Exception in RH Districts. * * * * (E) Applicability of Rent Ordinance; Regulatory Agreements. Project sponsors of projects utilizing the density exception of this subsection (c)(8) shall enter into a regulatory agreement with the City, subjecting the new units or Group Housing rooms created pursuant to the exception to the San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance (Chapter 37 of the Administrative Code), as a condition of approval of the density exception ("Regulatory Agreement"). At a minimum, the Regulatory Agreement shall contain the following: (i) a statement that the new units created pursuant to the density exception are not subject to the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act (California Civil Code Sections 1954.50 et seq.) because, under Section 1954.52(b), the property owner has entered into and agreed to the terms of this agreement with the City in consideration of an exception from residential density limits of up to four dwelling units per lot, or up to six units per lot in Corner Lots, or other direct financial contribution or other form of assistance specified in California Government Code Sections 65915 et seq.; (ii) a description of the exception of residential density or other direct financial contribution or form of assistance provided to the property owner; and (iii) a description of the remedies for breach of the agreement and other provisions to ensure implementation and compliance with the agreement. The property owner and the Supervisor Melgar BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 7 Planning Director (or the Director's designee), on behalf of the City, will execute the Regulatory Agreement, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney's Office. The Regulatory Agreement shall be executed prior to the City's issuance of the First Construction Document for the project, as defined in Section 107 A.13.1 of the San Francisco Building Code. Following execution of the Regulatory Agreement by all parties and approval by the City Attorney, the Regulatory Agreement or a memorandum thereof shall be recorded to the title records in the Office of the Assessor-Recorder against the property and shall be binding on all future owners and successors in interest. The Planning Department shall note the e.Jistence of any recorded Regulatory Agreement applicable to the new unils on a publicly-accessible website. * * * * SEC. 207.1. LOCAL ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT PROGRAM. * * * * (h) Regulatory Agreements. A Regulatory Agreement required by subsection 207.1 (g) as a condition of approval of an Accessory Dwelling Unit shall contain the following: * * * * (5) Following execution of the Regulatory Agreement by all parties and approval by the City Attorney, the Regulatory Agreement or a memorandum thereof shall be recorded against the property and shall be binding on all future owners and successors in interest. The Planning Department shall note the existence o(any recorded Regulatory Agreement applicable to the ADU on a publiclv-accessible website. * * * * Supervisor Melgar BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 8 SEC. 249.94. FAMILY AND SENIOR HOUSING OPPORTUNITY SPECIAL USE DISTRICT. * * * * (e) Applicability of Rent Ordinance; Regulatory Agreements. (1) Sponsors of projects utilizing any of the density exceptions above the base density up to the limits in subsection (d)(1) of this Section 249.94 shall enter into a regulatory agreement with the City subjecting the new units created pursuant to such density exception, except for any required Affordable Units as defined in Planning Code Section 401, to the Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance (Chapter 37 of the Administrative Code), as a condition of approval of the density exception ("Regulatory Agreement"). (2) The property owner and the Planning Director, or the Director's designee, on behalf of the City, will execute the Regulatory Agreement, which is subject to review and approval by the City Attorney's Office. The Regulatory Agreement shall be executed prior to the City's issuance of the First Construction Document for the project, as defined in Section 107 A.13.1 of the Building Code. Following execution of the Regulatory Agreement by all parties and approval by the City Attorney, the Regulatory Agreement or a memorandum thereof shall be recorded in the title records in the Office of the Assessor-Recorder against the property and shall be binding on all future owners and successors in interest. The Planning Department shall note the existence of any recorded Regulato,y Agreement applicab}e~tQ the new units on a publicly-accessible website. * * * * SEC. 306.1. APPLICATIONS AND FILING FEES. * * * * Supervisor Melgar BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 9 (c) Content of Applications. The content of applications shall be in accordance with the policies, rules and regulations of the Planning Department, Zoning Administrator,. and-fhe Planning Commission. All applications shall be upon forms prescribed therefor, and shall contain or be accompanied by all information required to assure the presentation of pertinent facts for proper consideration of the case and for the permanent record. The applicant may be required to file with hi-5their application the information needed for the preparation and mailing of notices as specified in Section 306.3, and the information required by subsection 31 70). In addition to any other information required by the Planning Department,-fhe Zoning Administrator,. and-fhe Planning Commission, an applicant for a conditional use pennitauthorization or variance who proposes a commercial use for the subject property shall disclose the name under which business will be, or is expected to be, conducted at the subject property, if such name is known at the time of application. The term "known" shall mean actual, not imputed knowledge, and shall consist of direct evidence including but not limited to a contract of sale, lease, or rental, or letter of intent or agreement, between the applicant and a commercial entity. If the business name becomes known to the applicant during the conditional use permit or variance processing period, the applicant promptly shall amend the application to disclose such business name. (d) Verification. Each application filed by or on behalf of one or more property owners shall be verified by at least one such owner or his their authorized agent attesting to the truth and correctness of all facts, statements and information presented. All applications shall include the following statement: "The information contained in this application is true and complete to the best of my knowledge, based upon diligent inquiry. This application is signed under penalty of perjury. I understand that willful or material misstatement(s) or omissions in the application may result in the rejecti0J1cancellation of the application and a lapse of time before the application may be resubmitted." The Zoning Administrator may reject a eontl-itional Supervisor Melgar BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 10 use 0r rariB:J'ICecancel any Development A.application as inaccurate and may require the applicant to re-file the application where the Zoning Administrator determines that the application includes material misstatements or omissions:-..:. provided, however. where the material misstatements or omissions relate to the presence or number of Unauthorized Dwelling Units or tenants on. the property, the Zoning Administrator shall cancel any development application as i,1acc1,1J"ale and shq/LJ-equire the applicant to re-file the application. Such rejectfrmcance/lgtion shall not be considered to be a denial of the application on its merits. Where the Zoning Administrator determines that such material misstatements or omissions were made willfully, the Zoning Administrator may require that the applicant wait up to 6six months before re-filing an application for substantially the same project. The Zoning Administrator's action in this regard may be appealed to the Board of Appeals pursuant to Section 308.2 of this Code. * * * * SEC. 317. LOSS OF RESIDENTIAL AND UNAUTHORIZED UNITS THROUGH DEMOLITION, MERGER, AND CONVERSION. * * * * (i) Disclosure of Unauthorized Units. (I) Disclosure Required. All Development Applications shall disclose the presence of any Unauthorized Unit at the subiecl property. In addition to the verification required by Planning Code subsection 306.1 (d). any Development Application that does not identify an Unauthorized Unit at the subiect propertv shall include a declaration, signed under penalty o(periury by the owner(s) Qr owner's authorized agent. that no Unauthorized Units exist at the propertv. (2) Application Co11tents. All Development Applications shall require the applicant to report certain information that may suggest the presence of Unauthorized Units at the propertv. The Supervisor Melgar BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 11 Planning Department shall develop. and publish on the Department's website, a list of such information, which shall include. at minimum: (A) The number of dwelling units at the proper(Yi and. to the best o[the applicant's knowledge, whether any units or bedrooms have been rented in the prior 10 years. (B) For each unit that has been rented the number of bedrooms in such unit. (C) The number o(mailboxes al the property. (D) The number o[wilitv meters at the property. (3) Planning Department Investigation. If the application states that the property does not ~onlain any Unauthorized Unit. but the information contained in the application leads Department s!affto reasonably believe Lhat an Unauthorized Unit may exist on the propertv, Department staff shall investigate whether the property contains anv Unauthorized Unit. Such investigation may include research into property and Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board rental records. inspection o[the property. or review of evidence o{prior tenancy submitted by current and former owners. tenants, and neighbors. Department staff shall revie1,11 and consider inspection reports and notices of violation prepared by the Department o[Building Inspection and any relevanl information contained in the Department 's files for the property. If. after conducting an investigation, the Department determines that the Development Application failed to disclose any Unauthorized Unit, the Department shall cancel Lhe Development Application as inaccurate pursuant to Section 306.J (d). (k) Department Inspection. Prior lo recommending approval of Residential Demolition, Conversion, or Merger. the Department shall inspect the property. The Department's inspection shall attempt to establish whether the property contains rental units and wb~ether any rental units are occupied. The Department shall also request information. from the Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board that indicates whether any rental units on the propertv are subiect to the Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration ordinance. Supervisor Melgar BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 12 Section 3. Chapter 1A of the Building Code, Section 103A, is hereby amended by revising Section 103A.6 (specifically Sections 103A.6.1, 103A.6.3.1, and 103A.6.4.2; Section 103A.6.2 reprinted for informational purposes only), to read as follows: 103A.6 Expanded Compliance Control and permit review. 1 0JA.6.1 Significant violation tracking reports. When any of the following occur: &a building inspector issues a Notice of Violation in which there is an instance of any of the following: (1) Misrepresentation of existing conditions or project scope that results in circumvention of notification or review requirements; (2) Structural work or demolition of structural features without or beyond the scope of a building permit; (3) Work under permit performed by a party without required license; or (4) Other substantial non-compliance; (b) any individual, agent. or entity with business before the Department is convicted of anv offense involving fraud. willful misrepresentation. or the making of any willfully inaccurate or false statement associated with a permit application or proiecl considered by the City. or any offense involving briberv or other unlawful influence of a Citv official or employee: or (c) the Planning Department notifies the Department that the Planning Department has identified a significant misrepresentation of existing conditions or proiect scope that has resulted in a failure to disclose or represent anv Unauthorized Unit in any permit applicaJion .suhmitted to the Department: Inspection Services Division shall log the violation described in subsections (a). (b). or (c) above,_and identify all individuals, agents, and elherentities associated with the permit and/or project in the Permit Tracking System (or other system of record) or known to be associated with Supervisor Melgar BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 13 the permit and/or project at the time the Notice of Violation is issued, or the violation described in subsections (b) or (c) is discovered. in the Compliance Control Tracking File maintained by the Inspection Services Division. The Compliance Control Tracking File is for internal purposes only; an individual, agent, or entity's presence in the file does not indicate responsibility for any violation or misconduct. For purposes o(Section 103A.6, "Unauthorized Unit" shall have the ame meaning as in Planning Code Section 31 7(b). 103A.6.2 Candidates for Expanded Compliance Control. (1) The Inspection Services Division shall review the Compliance Control Tracking File on a monthly basis to determine if any project, individual, agent, or entity has been associated with three or more reported violations described in 103A.6. 1 within the last 18 months. Any such project, individual, agent, or entity shall be a candidate for Expanded Compliance Control. (2) Even if the three-or-more-violations standard is not met during the 18-month period, the Department, in consultation with the City Attorney, may designate a project, individual, agent, or entity as a candidate for Expanded Compliance Control for any violation or violations that the Department determines, individually or together, to be egregious and create significant risk to health, safety, or property. 1 0JA.6.3 Expanded Compliance Control List. 1 0JA.6.3.1 Factors. In determining whether to include any candidate on the Expanded Compliance Control List, the following factors shall be considered: the candidate's role and conduct that contributed to the violations; any impacts on individual or public health, and safety; whether the misrepresentation of existing conditions or the misrepresentation of project scope was reckless or intentional to avoid permit review or notification requirementsL including any omission or misrepresentation regarding the presence of any Unauthorized Unit; the extent of the demolition or work that occurred without or beyond the scope of a building permit Supervisor Melgar BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 14 or without the necessary license or certification; any impacts on historically significant structures; prospective undervaluation of the construction cost that resulted in lower permit fees from the violations; and the number, frequency, and severity of violations. * * * * 103A.6.4.2 Measures. Upon placing a project, individual, agent, or entity on the Expanded Compliance Control List, the Department shall take the following actions: (1) Refer the listee to any applicable licensing board or regulatory agency with the Director's final determination and written findings; (2) Require all existing permit applications and addenda and any new applications or addenda submitted by or containing reference to the listee undergo Expanded Compliance Control by senior Plan Review Services staff and multi-station (all permit stations applicable to a given permit) review at intake and after the Planning Department approves the Site Permit (if applicable); and notify all parties listed on the applications or addenda for these permits of the Expanded Compliance Control requirement; (3) Require site inspections by the Department of Building Inspection and Planning Department prior to issuing any permit submitted by or containing reference to the listee; (4) Require that a licensed contractor be named on the permit prior to issuance, unless the applicant is filing for the permit as an Owner-Builder, in conformance with California Health and Safety Code Section 19825; (5) Dedicate a Senior Inspector to perform inspections and respond to any complaints or requests regarding the listee;-and (6) If warranted, consult with the City Attorney about any additional enforcement actions:-; and Supervisor Melgar BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 15 (7) If warranted, after consultation with the City Attorney. refer~ thelistee to the District Attorney with the Director's final determination and wriUen findings. * * * * Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after enactment. Enactment occurs when the Mayor signs the ordinance, the Mayor returns the ordinance unsigned or does not sign the ordinance within ten days of receiving it, or the Board of Supervisors overrides the Mayor's veto of the ordinance. Section 5. Scope of Ordinance. In enacting this ordinance, the Board of Supervisors intends to amend only those words, phrases, paragraphs, subsections, sections, articles, numbers, punctuation marks, charts, diagrams, or any other constituent parts of the Municipal Code that are explicitly shown in this ordinance as additions, deletions, Board amendment additions, and Board amendment deletions in accordance with the "Note" that appears under the official title of the ordinance. APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAVID CHIU, City Attorney By: Isl Peter Miljanich PETER MILJANICH Deputy City Attorney n:\legana\as2025\2400245\01858130.docx Supervisor Melgar BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 16 City and County of San Francisco Tails Ordinance City Hall I Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94 I 02-4689 File Number: 240803 Date Passed: September 02, 2025 Ordinance amending the Planning Code to require applicants to disclose the presence of any Unauthorized Dwelling Unit, and require the Planning Department to investigate any Unauthorized Dwelling Unit, upon submittal of a Development Application; require the Planning Department to document when a property is subject to a regulatory agreement subjecting any units on the property to the San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance; and require the Planning Department to inspect properties prior to recommending approval of any loss of a Residential Unit or Unauthorized Dwelling Unit; amending the Building Code to expand the Department of Building Inspection's Expanded Compliance Control Program to address fraud, bribery, and failure to accurately represent the presence and number of Unauthorized Dwelling Units at properties subject to a permit application: affirming the Planning Department's determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101 .1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. July 28, 2025 Land Use and Transportation Committee - DUPLICATED July 28, 2025 Land Use and Transportation Committee - AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE July 28, 2025 Land Use and Transportation Committee - RECOMMENDED AS AMENDED AS A COMMITTEE REPORT July 29, 2025 Board of Supervisors - PASSED, ON FIRST READING Ayes: 11 - Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Engardio, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill and Walton September 02, 2025 Board of Supervisors - FINALLY PASSED City and County of San Francisco Ayes: 11 - Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Engardio, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill and Walton Page I Printed aJ 12:05 pm on 9/3125 File No. 240803 tr~ City and County of San Francisco Daniel Lurie Mayor Page2 I hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was FINALLY PASSED on 9/2/2025 by the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco. " -c ~"~ Angela Calvillo Clerk of the Board °\ . 5 . 2,o 2, ~ Date Approved Printed at 12:05 pm on 9/3/25