9

ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS FOR ALTERATIONS AND NEW CONSTRUCTION

San Francisco Planning Code · SF Planning Code § 9

Corpus is an independent public-information project, not the official City of San Francisco website. Stable reference URL

SEC. 9. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS FOR ALTERATIONS AND NEW CONSTRUCTION. Additions to existing buildings and new infill construction proposed within the Clyde and Crooks Warehouse District must reflect an understanding of the relationship of the proposal with the contributing buildings within the district. Additions shall be reviewed for compatibility with the historic building and the District, while infill construction shall be reviewed for compatibility with the overall District. Neither should directly imitate nor replicate existing features. For additions, every effort should be made to minimize the visibility of the new structure within the District. Infill construction should reflect the character of the District, including the prevailing heights of contributing buildings without creating a false sense of history. Property owners should consult early in the process with a Planning Department Historic Preservation staff when developing a proposal. (a) Additions. Additions shall be reviewed on a case-by-case basis and any proposed addition should be located in an inconspicuous location and not result in a radical change to the form or character of the historic building. A vertical addition may be approved, depending on how the addition impacts the building and its relative visibility from the surrounding public rights-of-way within the district. The Planning Department evaluates all proposals for properties identified under Article 10 of the Planning Code for compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards (as set forth in Section 1006.6 of the Planning Code). Based on these Standards, Department staff uses the following criteria when reviewing proposals for vertical additions: (1) The structure respects the general size, shape, and scale of the features associated with the property and the District and the structure is connected to the property in a manner that does not alter, change, obscure, damage, or destroy any of the character-defining features of the property and the District. (2) The design respects the general historic and architectural characteristics associated with the property and the District without replicating historic styles or elements that will result in creating a false sense of history.

(3) The materials are compatible with the property or District in general character, color and texture. As part of the Planning Department review process, the project sponsor shall conduct and submit an analysis that illustrates the relative visibility of a proposed vertical addition from within the District. As part of this analysis, sightline cross-sections and perspective drawings illustrating the proportionality and scale, as well as the visible extent of the addition from prescribed locations should be submitted. (b) New Construction. When a district provides an opportunity for new construction through existing vacant parcels or by replacing non-contributing buildings, a sensitive design is of critical importance. Historic buildings within the District should be utilized and referenced for design context. Contemporary design that respects the District’s existing character-defining features without replicating historic designs is encouraged. The Department uses the following criteria when reviewing proposals for infill construction as well as the review standards set forth in Section 1006.6 of the Planning Code: (1) The structure respects the general size, shape, and scale of the character-defining features associated with the district and its relationship to the character-defining features of the immediate neighbors and the district. (2) The site plan respects the general site characteristics associated with the district. (3) The design respects the general character-defining features associated with the district. (4) The materials are compatible with the district in general character, color, and texture. (c) Standards for New Construction and Alterations. (1) Facade Line Continuity. Facade line continuity is historically appropriate. Therefore, setbacks at lower floors and arcades, not generally being features of the Clyde and Crooks Warehouse District, are generally not acceptable. (2) Fenestration and Design Elements for New Construction. In areas with a concentration of buildings characterized by a high proportion of mass to void and deeply recessed openings, vertical orientation and limited fenestration, the design of new construction should relate to those elements. In areas characterized by buildings with industrial style fenestration, new construction should relate to those design elements. (d) Exterior Changes Requiring Approval. Any exterior change within the Clyde and Crooks Warehouse District shall require a Certificate of Appropriateness pursuant to the provisions of Article 10 when such work requires a city permit. In addition, a Certificate of Appropriateness shall be required for cleaning masonry surfaces with abrasives and/or treatment of such surfaces with waterproofing chemicals. Sandblasting and certain chemical treatments detrimental to older brick will not be approved. (e) Signs. (1) Principal Signs. Only one sign will be allowed per establishment per street frontage. A flush sign with lettering intended to be read from across the street is permitted. On brick surfaces, signs should be mounted with a minimum number of penetrations of the wall, and those penetrations only in the mortar joints. (2) Secondary Signs. One per establishment per street frontage. A secondary sign is intended to be viewed close-up and consists of: (A) lettering on a door or window that contains only the name and nature of the establishment, hours of operation and other pertinent information; or (B) a projecting sign not exceeding two square feet in area used in conjunction with a principal flush sign. (f) Nothing in this legislation shall be construed to regulate paint colors within the District. (Added by Ord. 256-18, File No. 180723, App. 11/2/2018, Eff. 12/3/2018; amended by Ord. 136-21, File No. 210674, App. 8/4/2021, Eff. 9/4/2021) AMENDMENT HISTORY Division (e)(2) amended; final division redesignated as (f); Ord. 136-21, Eff. 9/4/2021. APPENDIX P TO ARTICLE 10 - CHULA-ABBEY EARLY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. Sec. 1. Findings and Purposes. Sec. 2. Designation. Sec. 3. Location and Boundaries. Sec. 4. Relation to Planning Code and the Provisions of the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco. Sec. 5. Statement of Significance. Sec. 6. Character-Defining Features. Sec. 7. Definitions. Sec. 8. Standards of Review of Applications. Sec. 9. Additional Provisions for Alterations, Additions and New Construction. Sec. 10. Significance of Individual Buildings to the District. Sec. 11. Paint Color.

SEC. 1. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES. The Board of Supervisors hereby finds that the area known and described in this ordinance as the Chula-Abbey Early Residential District contains 52 buildings that have a special character and special historical, architectural and aesthetic interest and value, and constitutes a distinct section of the City. The Board of Supervisors further finds that designation of said area as a District will be in furtherance of and in conformance with the purposes of Article 10 of the Planning Code and the standards set forth therein, and that preservation on an area basis rather than on the basis of individual structures alone is in order. This ordinance is intended to further the general purpose of historic preservation legislation as set forth in Section 1001 of the Planning Code, to promote the health, safety and general welfare of the public. (Added by Ord. 14-26, File No. 251100, App. 2/13/2026, Eff. 3/16/2026) SEC. 2. DESIGNATION. Pursuant to Section 1004 of the Planning Code, the Chula-Abbey Early Residential District is hereby designated as an Article 10 District, this designation having been duly approved by Resolution No. 1497 of the Historic Preservation Commission and Resolution No. 21858 of the Planning Commission, which Resolutions are on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors under File No. 251100 and which Resolutions are incorporated herein and made part hereof as though fully set forth. (Added by Ord. 14-26, File No. 251100, App. 2/13/2026, Eff. 3/16/2026) SEC. 3. LOCATION AND BOUNDARIES. The location and boundaries of the Chula-Abbey Early Residential District, which contains 52 buildings, encompassing properties on the south side of Chula Lane between its intersections with Church Street and Dolores Street with the exception of a concentration of properties located at the intersection of Chula Lane and Abbey Street. The District also includes properties on both sides of Abbey Street between Chula Lane and 17th Street, properties on the west side of Dolores Street between Chula Lane and 17th Street, and properties on the north side of 17th Street between Dolores and Church streets. The District includes lots contained within Assessor’s Blocks 3556 and 3579 and shall be as designated on the Chula-Abbey Early Residential District Map, the original of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors under File No. 251100, which Map is hereby incorporated herein as though fully set forth.